possible, the reasoning should be extended to include the real reasons it
was rejected -- this is just guesswork from my side. (This means you, Guido,
or anyone who can channel Guido enough to call himself Guido.)
- Rearrange and standardize headers
- Removed ^L's
- Spellchecked
- Indentation and formatting
- Added reference to PEP 202
Thomas, if the open issues have been decided, they can be `closed' in
this PEP, and then it should probably be marked as Accepted.
and the one TBD in there should be an 'XXX' in my opinion ;) but with a lot
of issues under 'Open issues'.
Please, comment freely, on anything from specific arguments and spelling
errors to style issues and argument-flow. I wrote all this on the train to
and from work, listening to UB40 on the way to work, and to my girlfriend
complaining about her work and her colleagues on the way home ;) So it might
be a bit incoherent in places.
One TBD that's going to come up a lot in PEPs, I think: how to wrap long
URLs ? I think whoever invents a good way to do that can become a
millionaire. Can we define/steal a good, standard way to wrap URLs, please ?