PEP: 229 Title: Using Distutils to Build Python Version: $Revision$ Author: akuchlin@mems-exchange.org (A.M. Kuchling) Status: Draft Type: Standards Created: 16-Nov-2000 Post-History: Introduction The Modules/Setup mechanism has some flaws: * People have to remember to uncomment bits of Modules/Setup in order to get all the possible modules. * Moving Setup to a new version of Python is tedious; new modules have been added, so you can't just copy the older version, but have to reconcile the two versions. * Users have to figure out where the needed libraries, such as zlib, are installed. Proposal Use the Distutils to build the modules that come with Python. The changes can be broken up into several pieces: 1. The Distutils needs some Python modules to be able to build modules. Currently I believe the minimal list is posix, _sre, and string. These modules will have to be built before the Distutils can be used, so they'll simply be hardwired into Modules/Makefile and be automatically built. 2. A top-level setup.py script will be written that checks the libraries installed on the system and compiles as many modules as possible. 3. Modules/Setup will be kept and settings in it will override setup.py's usual behavior, so you can disable a module known to be buggy, or specify particular compilation or linker flags. However, in the common case where setup.py works correctly, everything in Setup will remain commented out. The other Setup.* become unnecessary, since nothing will be generating Setup automatically. Implementation Patch #102588 on SourceForge contains the proposed patch. Currently the patch tries to be conservative and to change as few files as possible, in order to simplify backing out the patch. For example, no attempt is made to rip out the existing build mechanisms. Such simplifications can wait for later in the beta cycle, when we're certain the patch will be left in, or they can wait for Python 2.2. The patch makes the following changes: * Makes some required changes to distutils/sysconfig (these will be checked in separately) * In the top-level Makefile.in, the "sharedmods" target simply runs "./python setup.py build", and "sharedinstall" runs "./python setup.py install". The "clobber" target also deletes the build/ subdirectory where Distutils puts its output. * Modules/Setup.config.in only contains entries for the gc and thread modules; the readline, curses, and db modules are removed because it's now setup.py's job to handle them. * Modules/Setup.dist now contains entries for only 3 modules -- _sre, posix, and strop. * The configure script builds setup.cfg from setup.cfg.in. This is needed for two reasons: to make building in subdirectories work, and to get the configured installation prefix. * Adds setup.py to the top directory of the source tree. setup.py is the largest piece of the puzzle, though not the most complicated. setup.py contains a subclass of the BuildExt class, and extends it with a detect_modules() method that does the work of figuring out when modules can be compiled, and adding them to the 'exts' list. Unresolved Issues Do we need to make it possible to disable the 3 hard-wired modules without manually hacking the Makefiles? If yes, perhaps a configure switch is sufficient. The Distutils always compile modules as shared libraries. How do we support compiling them statically into the resulting Python binary? [Answer: building a Python binary with the Distutils should be feasible, though no one has implemented it yet. This should be done, though the main setup.py will probably need to implement its own BuildExt subclass anyway.] makesetup and the other contents of $(LIBPL)/config need to be preserved for compatibility with existing modules; for how many versions do we need to keep them around? Copyright This document has been placed in the public domain. Local Variables: mode: indented-text indent-tabs-mode: nil End: