python-peps/pep-3001/index.html

232 lines
14 KiB
HTML
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8">
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
<meta name="color-scheme" content="light dark">
<title>PEP 3001 Procedure for reviewing and improving standard library modules | peps.python.org</title>
<link rel="shortcut icon" href="../_static/py.png">
<link rel="canonical" href="https://peps.python.org/pep-3001/">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../_static/style.css" type="text/css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../_static/mq.css" type="text/css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../_static/pygments.css" type="text/css" media="(prefers-color-scheme: light)" id="pyg-light">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../_static/pygments_dark.css" type="text/css" media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" id="pyg-dark">
<link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Latest PEPs" href="https://peps.python.org/peps.rss">
<meta property="og:title" content='PEP 3001 Procedure for reviewing and improving standard library modules | peps.python.org'>
<meta property="og:description" content="This PEP describes a procedure for reviewing and improving standard library modules, especially those written in Python, making them ready for Python 3000. There can be different steps of refurbishing, each of which is described in a section below. Of...">
<meta property="og:type" content="website">
<meta property="og:url" content="https://peps.python.org/pep-3001/">
<meta property="og:site_name" content="Python Enhancement Proposals (PEPs)">
<meta property="og:image" content="https://peps.python.org/_static/og-image.png">
<meta property="og:image:alt" content="Python PEPs">
<meta property="og:image:width" content="200">
<meta property="og:image:height" content="200">
<meta name="description" content="This PEP describes a procedure for reviewing and improving standard library modules, especially those written in Python, making them ready for Python 3000. There can be different steps of refurbishing, each of which is described in a section below. Of...">
<meta name="theme-color" content="#3776ab">
</head>
<body>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" style="display: none;">
<symbol id="svg-sun-half" viewBox="0 0 24 24" pointer-events="all">
<title>Following system colour scheme</title>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none"
stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round">
<circle cx="12" cy="12" r="9"></circle>
<path d="M12 3v18m0-12l4.65-4.65M12 14.3l7.37-7.37M12 19.6l8.85-8.85"></path>
</svg>
</symbol>
<symbol id="svg-moon" viewBox="0 0 24 24" pointer-events="all">
<title>Selected dark colour scheme</title>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none"
stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round">
<path stroke="none" d="M0 0h24v24H0z" fill="none"></path>
<path d="M12 3c.132 0 .263 0 .393 0a7.5 7.5 0 0 0 7.92 12.446a9 9 0 1 1 -8.313 -12.454z"></path>
</svg>
</symbol>
<symbol id="svg-sun" viewBox="0 0 24 24" pointer-events="all">
<title>Selected light colour scheme</title>
<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 24 24" fill="none"
stroke="currentColor" stroke-width="2" stroke-linecap="round" stroke-linejoin="round">
<circle cx="12" cy="12" r="5"></circle>
<line x1="12" y1="1" x2="12" y2="3"></line>
<line x1="12" y1="21" x2="12" y2="23"></line>
<line x1="4.22" y1="4.22" x2="5.64" y2="5.64"></line>
<line x1="18.36" y1="18.36" x2="19.78" y2="19.78"></line>
<line x1="1" y1="12" x2="3" y2="12"></line>
<line x1="21" y1="12" x2="23" y2="12"></line>
<line x1="4.22" y1="19.78" x2="5.64" y2="18.36"></line>
<line x1="18.36" y1="5.64" x2="19.78" y2="4.22"></line>
</svg>
</symbol>
</svg>
<script>
document.documentElement.dataset.colour_scheme = localStorage.getItem("colour_scheme") || "auto"
</script>
<section id="pep-page-section">
<header>
<h1>Python Enhancement Proposals</h1>
<ul class="breadcrumbs">
<li><a href="https://www.python.org/" title="The Python Programming Language">Python</a> &raquo; </li>
<li><a href="../pep-0000/">PEP Index</a> &raquo; </li>
<li>PEP 3001</li>
</ul>
<button id="colour-scheme-cycler" onClick="setColourScheme(nextColourScheme())">
<svg aria-hidden="true" class="colour-scheme-icon-when-auto"><use href="#svg-sun-half"></use></svg>
<svg aria-hidden="true" class="colour-scheme-icon-when-dark"><use href="#svg-moon"></use></svg>
<svg aria-hidden="true" class="colour-scheme-icon-when-light"><use href="#svg-sun"></use></svg>
<span class="visually-hidden">Toggle light / dark / auto colour theme</span>
</button>
</header>
<article>
<section id="pep-content">
<h1 class="page-title">PEP 3001 Procedure for reviewing and improving standard library modules</h1>
<dl class="rfc2822 field-list simple">
<dt class="field-odd">Author<span class="colon">:</span></dt>
<dd class="field-odd">Georg Brandl &lt;georg&#32;&#97;t&#32;python.org&gt;</dd>
<dt class="field-even">Status<span class="colon">:</span></dt>
<dd class="field-even"><abbr title="Removed from consideration by sponsor or authors">Withdrawn</abbr></dd>
<dt class="field-odd">Type<span class="colon">:</span></dt>
<dd class="field-odd"><abbr title="Normative PEP describing or proposing a change to a Python community process, workflow or governance">Process</abbr></dd>
<dt class="field-even">Created<span class="colon">:</span></dt>
<dd class="field-even">05-Apr-2006</dd>
<dt class="field-odd">Post-History<span class="colon">:</span></dt>
<dd class="field-odd"><p></p></dd>
</dl>
<hr class="docutils" />
<section id="contents">
<details><summary>Table of Contents</summary><ul class="simple">
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#abstract">Abstract</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#removal-of-obsolete-modules">Removal of obsolete modules</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#renaming-modules">Renaming modules</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#code-cleanup">Code cleanup</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#enhancement-of-test-and-documentation-coverage">Enhancement of test and documentation coverage</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#unification-of-module-metadata">Unification of module metadata</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#backwards-incompatible-bug-fixes">Backwards incompatible bug fixes</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#interface-changes">Interface changes</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#references">References</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#copyright">Copyright</a></li>
</ul>
</details></section>
<section id="abstract">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#abstract" role="doc-backlink">Abstract</a></h2>
<p>This PEP describes a procedure for reviewing and improving standard
library modules, especially those written in Python, making them ready
for Python 3000. There can be different steps of refurbishing, each
of which is described in a section below. Of course, not every step
has to be performed for every module.</p>
</section>
<section id="removal-of-obsolete-modules">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#removal-of-obsolete-modules" role="doc-backlink">Removal of obsolete modules</a></h2>
<p>All modules marked as deprecated in 2.x versions should be removed for
Python 3000. The same applies to modules which are seen as obsolete today,
but are too widely used to be deprecated or removed. Python 3000 is the
big occasion to get rid of them.</p>
<p>There will have to be a document listing all removed modules, together
with information on possible substitutes or alternatives. This
information will also have to be provided by the python3warn.py porting
helper script mentioned in PEP XXX.</p>
</section>
<section id="renaming-modules">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#renaming-modules" role="doc-backlink">Renaming modules</a></h2>
<p>There are proposals for a “great stdlib renaming” introducing a hierarchic
library namespace or a top-level package from which to import standard
modules. That possibility aside, some modules names are known to have
been chosen unwisely, a mistake which could never be corrected in the 2.x
series. Examples are names like “StringIO” or “Cookie”. For Python 3000,
there will be the possibility to give those modules less confusing and
more conforming names.</p>
<p>Of course, each rename will have to be stated in the documentation of
the respective module and perhaps in the global document of Step 1.
Additionally, the python3warn.py script will recognize the old module
names and notify the user accordingly.</p>
<p>If the name change is made in time for another release of the Python 2.x
series, it is worth considering to introduce the new name in the 2.x
branch to ease transition.</p>
</section>
<section id="code-cleanup">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#code-cleanup" role="doc-backlink">Code cleanup</a></h2>
<p>As most library modules written in Python have not been touched except
for bug fixes, following the policy of never changing a running system,
many of them may contain code that is not up to the newest language
features and could be rewritten in a more concise, modern Python.</p>
<p>PyChecker should run cleanly over the library. With a carefully tuned
configuration file, PyLint should also emit as few warnings as possible.</p>
<p>As long as these changes dont change the modules interface and behavior,
no documentation updates are necessary.</p>
</section>
<section id="enhancement-of-test-and-documentation-coverage">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#enhancement-of-test-and-documentation-coverage" role="doc-backlink">Enhancement of test and documentation coverage</a></h2>
<p>Code coverage by unit tests varies greatly between modules. Each test
suite should be checked for completeness, and the remaining classic tests
should be converted to PyUnit (or whatever new shiny testing framework
comes with Python 3000, perhaps py.test?).</p>
<p>It should also be verified that each publicly visible function has a
meaningful docstring which ideally contains several doctests.</p>
<p>No documentation changes are necessary for enhancing test coverage.</p>
</section>
<section id="unification-of-module-metadata">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#unification-of-module-metadata" role="doc-backlink">Unification of module metadata</a></h2>
<p>This is a small and probably not very important step. There have been
various attempts at providing author, version and similar metadata in
modules (such as a “__version__” global). Those could be standardized
and used throughout the library.</p>
<p>No documentation changes are necessary for this step, too.</p>
</section>
<section id="backwards-incompatible-bug-fixes">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#backwards-incompatible-bug-fixes" role="doc-backlink">Backwards incompatible bug fixes</a></h2>
<p>Over the years, many bug reports have been filed which complained about
bugs in standard library modules, but have subsequently been closed as
“Wont fix” since a fix would have introduced a major incompatibility
which was not acceptable in the Python 2.x series. In Python 3000, the
fix can be applied if the interface per se is still acceptable.</p>
<p>Each slight behavioral change caused by such fixes must be mentioned in
the documentation, perhaps in a “Changed in Version 3.0” paragraph.</p>
</section>
<section id="interface-changes">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#interface-changes" role="doc-backlink">Interface changes</a></h2>
<p>The last and most disruptive change is the overhaul of a modules public
interface. If a modules interface is to be changed, a justification
should be made beforehand, or a PEP should be written.</p>
<p>The change must be fully documented as “New in Version 3.0”, and the
python3warn.py script must know about it.</p>
</section>
<section id="references">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#references" role="doc-backlink">References</a></h2>
<p>None yet.</p>
</section>
<section id="copyright">
<h2><a class="toc-backref" href="#copyright" role="doc-backlink">Copyright</a></h2>
<p>This document has been placed in the public domain.</p>
</section>
</section>
<hr class="docutils" />
<p>Source: <a class="reference external" href="https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-3001.rst">https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-3001.rst</a></p>
<p>Last modified: <a class="reference external" href="https://github.com/python/peps/commits/main/peps/pep-3001.rst">2023-09-09 17:39:29 GMT</a></p>
</article>
<nav id="pep-sidebar">
<h2>Contents</h2>
<ul>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#abstract">Abstract</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#removal-of-obsolete-modules">Removal of obsolete modules</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#renaming-modules">Renaming modules</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#code-cleanup">Code cleanup</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#enhancement-of-test-and-documentation-coverage">Enhancement of test and documentation coverage</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#unification-of-module-metadata">Unification of module metadata</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#backwards-incompatible-bug-fixes">Backwards incompatible bug fixes</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#interface-changes">Interface changes</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#references">References</a></li>
<li><a class="reference internal" href="#copyright">Copyright</a></li>
</ul>
<br>
<a id="source" href="https://github.com/python/peps/blob/main/peps/pep-3001.rst">Page Source (GitHub)</a>
</nav>
</section>
<script src="../_static/colour_scheme.js"></script>
<script src="../_static/wrap_tables.js"></script>
<script src="../_static/sticky_banner.js"></script>
</body>
</html>