307 lines
10 KiB
ReStructuredText
307 lines
10 KiB
ReStructuredText
PEP: 442
|
|
Title: Safe object finalization
|
|
Version: $Revision$
|
|
Last-Modified: $Date$
|
|
Author: Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net>
|
|
BDFL-Delegate: Benjamin Peterson <benjamin@python.org>
|
|
Status: Final
|
|
Type: Standards Track
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
|
Created: 18-May-2013
|
|
Python-Version: 3.4
|
|
Post-History: 18-May-2013
|
|
Resolution: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2013-June/126746.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
This PEP proposes to deal with the current limitations of object
|
|
finalization. The goal is to be able to define and run finalizers
|
|
for any object, regardless of their position in the object graph.
|
|
|
|
This PEP doesn't call for any change in Python code. Objects
|
|
with existing finalizers will benefit automatically.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Definitions
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
Reference
|
|
A directional link from an object to another. The target of the
|
|
reference is kept alive by the reference, as long as the source is
|
|
itself alive and the reference isn't cleared.
|
|
|
|
Weak reference
|
|
A directional link from an object to another, which doesn't keep
|
|
alive its target. This PEP focuses on non-weak references.
|
|
|
|
Reference cycle
|
|
A cyclic subgraph of directional links between objects, which keeps
|
|
those objects from being collected in a pure reference-counting
|
|
scheme.
|
|
|
|
Cyclic isolate (CI)
|
|
A standalone subgraph of objects in which no object is referenced
|
|
from the outside, containing one or several reference cycles, *and*
|
|
whose objects are still in a usable, non-broken state: they can
|
|
access each other from their respective finalizers.
|
|
|
|
Cyclic garbage collector (GC)
|
|
A device able to detect cyclic isolates and turn them into cyclic
|
|
trash. Objects in cyclic trash are eventually disposed of by
|
|
the natural effect of the references being cleared and their
|
|
reference counts dropping to zero.
|
|
|
|
Cyclic trash (CT)
|
|
A former cyclic isolate whose objects have started being cleared
|
|
by the GC. Objects in cyclic trash are potential zombies; if they
|
|
are accessed by Python code, the symptoms can vary from weird
|
|
AttributeErrors to crashes.
|
|
|
|
Zombie / broken object
|
|
An object part of cyclic trash. The term stresses that the object
|
|
is not safe: its outgoing references may have been cleared, or one
|
|
of the objects it references may be zombie. Therefore,
|
|
it should not be accessed by arbitrary code (such as finalizers).
|
|
|
|
Finalizer
|
|
A function or method called when an object is intended to be
|
|
disposed of. The finalizer can access the object and release any
|
|
resource held by the object (for example mutexes or file
|
|
descriptors). An example is a ``__del__`` method.
|
|
|
|
Resurrection
|
|
The process by which a finalizer creates a new reference to an
|
|
object in a CI. This can happen as a quirky but supported
|
|
side-effect of ``__del__`` methods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact
|
|
======
|
|
|
|
While this PEP discusses CPython-specific implementation details, the
|
|
change in finalization semantics is expected to affect the Python
|
|
ecosystem as a whole. In particular, this PEP obsoletes the current
|
|
guideline that "objects with a ``__del__`` method should not be part of a
|
|
reference cycle".
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
The primary benefits of this PEP regard objects with finalizers, such
|
|
as objects with a ``__del__`` method and generators with a ``finally``
|
|
block. Those objects can now be reclaimed when they are part of a
|
|
reference cycle.
|
|
|
|
The PEP also paves the way for further benefits:
|
|
|
|
* The module shutdown procedure may not need to set global variables to
|
|
None anymore. This could solve a well-known class of irritating issues.
|
|
|
|
The PEP doesn't change the semantics of:
|
|
|
|
* Weak references caught in reference cycles.
|
|
|
|
* C extension types with a custom ``tp_dealloc`` function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
===========
|
|
|
|
Reference-counted disposal
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
In normal reference-counted disposal, an object's finalizer is called
|
|
just before the object is deallocated. If the finalizer resurrects
|
|
the object, deallocation is aborted.
|
|
|
|
*However*, if the object was already finalized, then the finalizer isn't
|
|
called. This prevents us from finalizing zombies (see below).
|
|
|
|
Disposal of cyclic isolates
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Cyclic isolates are first detected by the garbage collector, and then
|
|
disposed of. The detection phase doesn't change and won't be described
|
|
here. Disposal of a CI traditionally works in the following order:
|
|
|
|
1. Weakrefs to CI objects are cleared, and their callbacks called. At
|
|
this point, the objects are still safe to use.
|
|
|
|
2. The CI becomes a CT as the GC systematically breaks all
|
|
known references inside it (using the ``tp_clear`` function).
|
|
|
|
3. Nothing. All CT objects should have been disposed of in step 2
|
|
(as a side-effect of clearing references); this collection is
|
|
finished.
|
|
|
|
This PEP proposes to turn CI disposal into the following sequence (new
|
|
steps are in bold):
|
|
|
|
1. Weakrefs to CI objects are cleared, and their callbacks called. At
|
|
this point, the objects are still safe to use.
|
|
|
|
2. **The finalizers of all CI objects are called.**
|
|
|
|
3. **The CI is traversed again to determine if it is still isolated.
|
|
If it is determined that at least one object in CI is now reachable
|
|
from outside the CI, this collection is aborted and the whole CI
|
|
is resurrected. Otherwise, proceed.**
|
|
|
|
4. The CI becomes a CT as the GC systematically breaks all
|
|
known references inside it (using the ``tp_clear`` function).
|
|
|
|
5. Nothing. All CT objects should have been disposed of in step 4
|
|
(as a side-effect of clearing references); this collection is
|
|
finished.
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
The GC doesn't recalculate the CI after step 2 above, hence the need
|
|
for step 3 to check that the whole subgraph is still isolated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
C-level changes
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
Type objects get a new ``tp_finalize`` slot to which ``__del__`` methods
|
|
are mapped (and reciprocally). Generators are modified to use this slot,
|
|
rather than ``tp_del``. A ``tp_finalize`` function is a normal C
|
|
function which will be called with a valid and alive ``PyObject`` as its
|
|
only argument. It doesn't need to manipulate the object's reference count,
|
|
as this will be done by the caller. However, it must ensure that the
|
|
original exception state is restored before returning to the caller.
|
|
|
|
For compatibility, ``tp_del`` is kept in the type structure. Handling
|
|
of objects with a non-NULL ``tp_del`` is unchanged: when part of a CI,
|
|
they are not finalized and end up in ``gc.garbage``. However, a non-NULL
|
|
``tp_del`` is not encountered anymore in the CPython source tree (except
|
|
for testing purposes).
|
|
|
|
Two new C API functions are provided to ease calling of ``tp_finalize``,
|
|
especially from custom deallocators.
|
|
|
|
On the internal side, a bit is reserved in the GC header for GC-managed
|
|
objects to signal that they were finalized. This helps avoid finalizing
|
|
an object twice (and, especially, finalizing a CT object after it was
|
|
broken by the GC).
|
|
|
|
.. note::
|
|
Objects which are not GC-enabled can also have a ``tp_finalize`` slot.
|
|
They don't need the additional bit since their ``tp_finalize`` function
|
|
can only be called from the deallocator: it therefore cannot be called
|
|
twice, except when resurrected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
Predictability
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
Following this scheme, an object's finalizer is always called exactly
|
|
once, even if it was resurrected afterwards.
|
|
|
|
For CI objects, the order in which finalizers are called (step 2 above)
|
|
is undefined.
|
|
|
|
Safety
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
It is important to explain why the proposed change is safe. There
|
|
are two aspects to be discussed:
|
|
|
|
* Can a finalizer access zombie objects (including the object being
|
|
finalized)?
|
|
|
|
* What happens if a finalizer mutates the object graph so as to impact
|
|
the CI?
|
|
|
|
Let's discuss the first issue. We will divide possible cases in two
|
|
categories:
|
|
|
|
* If the object being finalized is part of the CI: by construction, no
|
|
objects in CI are zombies yet, since CI finalizers are called before
|
|
any reference breaking is done. Therefore, the finalizer cannot
|
|
access zombie objects, which don't exist.
|
|
|
|
* If the object being finalized is not part of the CI/CT: by definition,
|
|
objects in the CI/CT don't have any references pointing to them from
|
|
outside the CI/CT. Therefore, the finalizer cannot reach any zombie
|
|
object (that is, even if the object being finalized was itself
|
|
referenced from a zombie object).
|
|
|
|
Now for the second issue. There are three potential cases:
|
|
|
|
* The finalizer clears an existing reference to a CI object. The CI
|
|
object may be disposed of before the GC tries to break it, which
|
|
is fine (the GC simply has to be aware of this possibility).
|
|
|
|
* The finalizer creates a new reference to a CI object. This can only
|
|
happen from a CI object's finalizer (see above why). Therefore, the
|
|
new reference will be detected by the GC after all CI finalizers are
|
|
called (step 3 above), and collection will be aborted without any
|
|
objects being broken.
|
|
|
|
* The finalizer clears or creates a reference to a non-CI object. By
|
|
construction, this is not a problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementation
|
|
==============
|
|
|
|
An implementation is available in branch ``finalize`` of the repository
|
|
at http://hg.python.org/features/finalize/.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Validation
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
Besides running the normal Python test suite, the implementation adds
|
|
test cases for various finalization possibilities including reference cycles,
|
|
object resurrection and legacy ``tp_del`` slots.
|
|
|
|
The implementation has also been checked to not produce any regressions on
|
|
the following test suites:
|
|
|
|
* `Tulip <http://code.google.com/p/tulip/>`_, which makes an extensive
|
|
use of generators
|
|
|
|
* `Tornado <http://www.tornadoweb.org>`_
|
|
|
|
* `SQLAlchemy <http://www.sqlalchemy.org/>`_
|
|
|
|
* `Django <https://www.djangoproject.com/>`_
|
|
|
|
* `zope.interface <http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.interface>`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
Notes about reference cycle collection and weak reference callbacks:
|
|
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/4e687d53b645/Modules/gc_weakref.txt
|
|
|
|
Generator memory leak: http://bugs.python.org/issue17468
|
|
|
|
Allow objects to decide if they can be collected by GC:
|
|
http://bugs.python.org/issue9141
|
|
|
|
Module shutdown procedure based on GC
|
|
http://bugs.python.org/issue812369
|
|
|
|
Copyright
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
Local Variables:
|
|
mode: indented-text
|
|
indent-tabs-mode: nil
|
|
sentence-end-double-space: t
|
|
fill-column: 70
|
|
coding: utf-8
|
|
End:
|