436 lines
17 KiB
ReStructuredText
436 lines
17 KiB
ReStructuredText
PEP: 738
|
||
Title: Adding Android as a supported platform
|
||
Author: Malcolm Smith <smith@chaquo.com>
|
||
Sponsor: Petr Viktorin <encukou@gmail.com>
|
||
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-738-adding-android-as-a-supported-platform/40975
|
||
Status: Draft
|
||
Type: Standards Track
|
||
Created: 12-Dec-2023
|
||
Python-Version: 3.13
|
||
|
||
|
||
Abstract
|
||
========
|
||
|
||
This PEP proposes adding Android as a supported platform in CPython. The initial
|
||
goal is for Android to achieve Tier 3 support in Python 3.13.
|
||
|
||
This PEP is based on :pep:`730` – "Adding iOS as a supported platform" by
|
||
Russell Keith-Magee, and covers many of the same issues. Notable differences
|
||
between the two platforms can be found by searching for the word "iOS".
|
||
|
||
|
||
Motivation
|
||
==========
|
||
|
||
Over the last 15 years, mobile platforms have become increasingly important
|
||
parts of the computing landscape. Android is the operating system that runs on
|
||
about `70% of these devices
|
||
<https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/mobile/worldwide>`__. However, there
|
||
is no official support for Android in CPython.
|
||
|
||
The `Chaquopy <https://chaquo.com/chaquopy/>`__, `BeeWare
|
||
<https://beeware.org>`__ and `Kivy <https://kivy.org>`__ projects
|
||
have all supported Android for many years, and they have all been used to
|
||
generate applications that have been accepted for publication in the Google Play
|
||
Store. This demonstrates the technical feasibility of Android support.
|
||
|
||
It is important for the future of Python as a language that it is able to be
|
||
used on any platform that has widespread adoption. Otherwise, potential users
|
||
will choose other languages that *do* provide support for these platforms. This
|
||
is especially true in education, where the next generation of developers is in
|
||
many cases already spending more time using mobile platforms than desktop ones.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Rationale
|
||
=========
|
||
|
||
General
|
||
-------
|
||
|
||
Android is broadly a POSIX platform, based on a Linux kernel and the
|
||
ELF binary format. It does not use glibc, instead providing its own C
|
||
library implementation called Bionic. As a result, it is generally not
|
||
binary-compatible with any other Linux distribution, even if the architecture
|
||
matches. It also has its own filesystem layout which doesn't resemble any other
|
||
Unix.
|
||
|
||
However, Android's source-compatibility with Linux is quite good. In its early years,
|
||
the C library was very incomplete, but most of the gaps were filled by around
|
||
2014. Since then, any C code that compiles for Linux can usually be compiled for
|
||
Android, unless it involves direct access to hardware devices or operating
|
||
system services.
|
||
|
||
This is also true of CPython. Although it has never officially supported
|
||
Android, recent versions (since 3.6) can already be compiled for Android with
|
||
minimal patching.
|
||
|
||
.. _738-os-versions:
|
||
|
||
OS versions
|
||
-----------
|
||
|
||
Each Android version can be identified in three ways:
|
||
|
||
* A conventional dotted version number (though recent versions have all used
|
||
whole numbers)
|
||
* A sequential integer "API level" (the most common form in developer
|
||
documentation)
|
||
* An alphabetic confectionery-themed code name (no longer used for marketing,
|
||
but still appears in developer documentation)
|
||
|
||
There is no consistent pattern to link one of these to another; they must be
|
||
looked up in `a table <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history>`__.
|
||
|
||
A new major Android version is released each year, but the updates available to
|
||
each device are entirely under the control of its manufacturer. Unfortunately
|
||
many manufacturers stop sending updates to devices long before their users are
|
||
ready to dispose of them. For example, as of October 2023, the oldest Android
|
||
version still receiving security updates was API level 30, but according to
|
||
`Google's own statistics
|
||
<https://dl.google.com/android/studio/metadata/distributions.json>`__, only 60%
|
||
of devices were on that version or newer.
|
||
|
||
For Python 3.13 we therefore propose the minimum Android version to be 5.0
|
||
(API level 21), which was released in 2014. According to the statistics above,
|
||
this would cover 99% of active devices.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Development tools
|
||
-----------------
|
||
|
||
The Android development tools are equally supported on Linux (x86_64), Windows
|
||
(x86_64) and macOS (x86_64 and ARM64). For CPython, the most important tools
|
||
are:
|
||
|
||
* The NDK (native development kit) contains a C and C++ compiler (clang),
|
||
linker (lld), and headers for all the system libraries.
|
||
|
||
Binary compatibility between libraries compiled with different versions of the
|
||
NDK is generally very good, but for reproducibility it would be best for each
|
||
Python version to stick with one NDK version throughout its life. For Python
|
||
3.13, this would be the current NDK long-term support version, r26.
|
||
|
||
Each NDK version can be set to target any of a wide range of Android versions.
|
||
For example, NDK r26 supports :ref:`API levels <738-os-versions>` 21 to 34.
|
||
However, binaries compiled for an older Android version will usually keep on
|
||
working indefinitely on newer versions; exceptions to this rule are only made
|
||
for security reasons.
|
||
|
||
* Gradle is the tool used to build complete, deployable apps.
|
||
|
||
* The emulator, based on QEMU, is a simulated Android device running on a
|
||
development machine. Unlike on iOS, an emulator uses the same ABI as a real
|
||
device of the same architecture, and can run the same binaries.
|
||
|
||
These tools may all be used either from the command line, or through the Android
|
||
Studio IDE, which is based on IntelliJ IDEA.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Architectures
|
||
-------------
|
||
|
||
Android currently supports 4 architectures. Their names as used by the Android
|
||
tools are:
|
||
|
||
* ``armeabi-v7a``
|
||
* ``arm64-v8a``
|
||
* ``x86``
|
||
* ``x86_64``
|
||
|
||
Virtually all current physical devices use one of the ARM architectures. ``x86``
|
||
and ``x86_64`` are supported for use in the emulator.
|
||
|
||
For Python 3.13 we propose that Tier 3 support will only cover the 64-bit platforms
|
||
(``arm64-v8a`` and ``x86_64``):
|
||
|
||
* ``x86`` has not been supported as a development platform since 2020, and no
|
||
new emulator images have been released since then.
|
||
|
||
* ``armeabi-v7a``'s proportion of active devices is now
|
||
`less than 10% and steadily falling
|
||
<https://github.com/chaquo/chaquopy/issues/709#issuecomment-1744541892>`__.
|
||
|
||
It would also be more difficult to cover with a reliable buildbot, since there
|
||
are no native hosts available for the emulator (ARM64 Macs don't have hardware
|
||
support for ARM32 code). Although cross-architecture emulation is possible, it
|
||
has much worse performance and stability, which is why the ``armeabi-v7a``
|
||
emulator images have not been updated since 2016.
|
||
|
||
However, it continues to be used for watches and ultra-low-cost phones. If
|
||
this persists, we may need to consider adding it in a future Python version.
|
||
|
||
Even if 32-bit architectures are not officially supported, no changes should be
|
||
made which would impede any downstream projects which still wish to build them.
|
||
|
||
|
||
App lifecycle
|
||
-------------
|
||
|
||
The primary programming language in Android apps is Java, or its modern descendant
|
||
Kotlin. As such, an app does not provide its own executable file. Instead, all
|
||
apps start off as a Java virtual machine running an executable provided by the
|
||
operating system. The app's Java code can then add native code to the process by
|
||
loading dynamic libraries and calling them through JNI.
|
||
|
||
Unlike iOS, creating subprocesses *is* supported on Android. However apps may
|
||
only run executables in `certain locations
|
||
<https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/128554619#comment4>`__, none of which
|
||
are writable at runtime. Long-running subprocesses are `officially discouraged
|
||
<https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/128554619#comment4>`__, and are not
|
||
guaranteed to be supported in future Android versions.
|
||
|
||
Android does provide a command-line shell, but this is intended only for use by
|
||
developers, and is not available to the typical end user.
|
||
|
||
For these reasons, the recommended way of running Python on Android will be by
|
||
loading ``libpython3.x.so`` into the main app process. A ``python3.x``
|
||
executable will not be officially supported on this platform.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Specification
|
||
=============
|
||
|
||
Scope of work
|
||
-------------
|
||
|
||
The focus of this work will be to produce an Android equivalent to the existing
|
||
`Windows embeddable package
|
||
<https://docs.python.org/3/using/windows.html#the-embeddable-package>`__,
|
||
i.e. a set of compiled libraries which developers
|
||
can add to their apps. No installer will be required.
|
||
|
||
Adding Android as a Tier 3 platform only requires adding support for compiling
|
||
an Android-compatible build from the unpatched CPython source code. It does not
|
||
necessarily require there to be any officially distributed Android artifacts on
|
||
python.org, although these could be added in the future.
|
||
|
||
A Gradle project will be provided for the purpose of running the CPython test
|
||
suite. Tooling will be provided to automate the process of building the test
|
||
suite app, starting the emulator, installing the test suite, and executing
|
||
it.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Linkage
|
||
-------
|
||
|
||
For the reasons discussed in `App lifecycle`_, Python will be included in the
|
||
app as a dynamic ``libpython3.x.so`` library which can be loaded into an app
|
||
using ``dlopen``.
|
||
|
||
Unlike Linux, Android does not implicitly use a dlopened library to resolve
|
||
relocations in subsequently-loaded libraries, `even if RTLD_GLOBAL is used
|
||
<https://github.com/android/ndk/issues/1244#issuecomment-620310397>`__. All
|
||
Python extension modules must therefore be explicitly linked against
|
||
``libpython3.x.so`` when building for Android.
|
||
|
||
An extension module linked against ``libpython3.x.so`` cannot be loaded by an
|
||
executable that has been statically linked against ``libpython3.x.a``.
|
||
Therefore, a static ``libpython3.x.a`` library will not be supported on Android.
|
||
This is the same pattern used by CPython on Windows.
|
||
|
||
This approach also allows using the ``-Wl,--no-undefined`` option to detect
|
||
missing symbols at build time, which can be a significant time-saver.
|
||
|
||
Unlike iOS, Android allows dynamic libraries to be loaded from any location, so
|
||
a directory tree containing co-located .py, .pyc and .so files can be handled by
|
||
Python's standard importer.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Standard library
|
||
----------------
|
||
|
||
Unsupported modules
|
||
'''''''''''''''''''
|
||
|
||
A number of standard library modules will not be supported on Android because
|
||
the underlying C APIs are not available:
|
||
|
||
* ``curses`` and ``readline``
|
||
* ``dbm.gnu`` and ``dbm.ndbm``
|
||
* ``grp``
|
||
* ``multiprocessing`` – although subprocesses in general are allowed (see `App
|
||
lifecycle`_), Android does not support any part of the `System V IPC API
|
||
<https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/sysvipc.7.html>`__.
|
||
* ``tkinter`` and ``turtle`` – these would require an Android build of Tk
|
||
itself, which is not officially supported.
|
||
|
||
``sys``
|
||
'''''''
|
||
|
||
``sys.platform`` will return ``"android"``. Although Android is based on Linux,
|
||
it differs in enough significant ways that a separate name is justified.
|
||
|
||
When embedded in an Android app, the C-level stdio streams are not connected to
|
||
anything. So in this mode, ``sys.stdout`` and ``sys.stderr`` will be redirected
|
||
to the system `Logcat <https://developer.android.com/studio/debug/logcat>`__,
|
||
which can be viewed with the Android development tools. ``sys.stdin`` will
|
||
always return EOF.
|
||
|
||
``platform``
|
||
''''''''''''
|
||
|
||
Most of the values returned by the ``platform`` module will match those returned
|
||
by ``os.uname()``, with the exception of:
|
||
|
||
* ``platform.system()`` - ``"Android"``, instead of the default ``"Linux"``
|
||
|
||
* ``platform.release()`` - Android version number, as a string (e.g. ``"14"``),
|
||
instead of the Linux kernel version
|
||
|
||
In addition, a ``platform.android_ver()`` method will be added, which returns a
|
||
namedtuple containing the following:
|
||
|
||
* ``release`` - Android version of the device, as a string (e.g. ``"14"``)
|
||
* ``api_level`` - :ref:`API level <738-os-versions>` of the device, as an
|
||
integer (e.g. ``34``)
|
||
* ``min_api_level`` - Minimum API level this build of Python can run on, as
|
||
an integer (e.g. ``23``). This is the same as ``sys.getandroidapilevel``.
|
||
* ``manufacturer`` - `manufacturer
|
||
<https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/Build#MANUFACTURER>`__ of
|
||
the device, as a string (e.g. ``"Google"``)
|
||
* ``model`` - `model name
|
||
<https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/Build#MODEL>`__ of the
|
||
device, as a string (e.g. ``"Pixel 7"``)
|
||
* ``device`` - `device name
|
||
<https://developer.android.com/reference/android/os/Build#DEVICE>`__ of the
|
||
device, as a string (e.g. ``"panther"``)
|
||
|
||
Which one of ``model`` and ``device`` is more likely to be unique, and which one
|
||
is more likely to resemble the marketing name, varies between different
|
||
manufacturers.
|
||
|
||
``os``
|
||
''''''
|
||
|
||
``os.uname()`` will return the raw result of a POSIX ``uname()`` call. This will
|
||
result in the following values:
|
||
|
||
* ``sysname`` - ``"Linux"``
|
||
|
||
* ``release`` - The Linux kernel version (e.g.
|
||
``"5.10.157-android13-4-00003-gdfb1120f912b-ab10994928"``)
|
||
|
||
This approach treats the ``os`` module as a "raw" interface to system APIs, and
|
||
``platform`` as a higher-level API providing more generally useful values.
|
||
|
||
|
||
CI resources
|
||
------------
|
||
|
||
Since Android emulators and physical devices use the same ABI, and come with
|
||
identical or very similar operating system binaries, testing on emulators will
|
||
be adequate. x86_64 emulators can be run on Linux, macOS or Windows, but ARM64
|
||
emulators are only supported on ARM64 Macs.
|
||
|
||
GitHub Actions is able to host Android emulators on their Linux and macOS
|
||
runners. The free tier currently only provides x86_64 machines; however ARM64
|
||
macOS runners `recently became available on paid plans <https://github.blog/
|
||
2023-10-02-introducing-the-new-apple-silicon-powered-m1-macos-larger-runner-for-github-actions/>`__.
|
||
|
||
If necessary, `Anaconda <https://anaconda.com>`__ has also offered to provide
|
||
Android CI resources.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Packaging
|
||
---------
|
||
|
||
Android wheels will use tags in the format ``android_<api-level>_<abi>``. For
|
||
example:
|
||
|
||
* ``android_21_arm64_v8a``
|
||
* ``android_21_x86_64``
|
||
|
||
For the meaning of ``<api-level>``, see `OS versions`_. In the context of
|
||
the wheel tag, it indicates the minimum Android version that was selected when
|
||
the wheel was compiled. Installation tools such as pip should interpret this in
|
||
a similar way to the existing macOS tags, i.e. an app with a minimum API level
|
||
of N can incorporate wheels tagged with API level N or older.
|
||
|
||
This format originates from the Chaquopy project, which currently maintains a
|
||
`wheel repository <https://chaquo.com/pypi-13.1/>`__ with tags varying between
|
||
API levels 16 and 21.
|
||
|
||
However, relying on a small group of Android enthusiasts to build the whole
|
||
Python ecosystem is not a scalable solution. Until prominent libraries routinely
|
||
release their own Android wheels, the ability of the community to adopt
|
||
Python on Android will be limited.
|
||
|
||
Therefore, it will be necessary to clearly document how projects can add Android
|
||
builds to their CI and release tooling. Adding Android support to tools like
|
||
`crossenv <https://crossenv.readthedocs.io/>`__ and `cibuildwheel
|
||
<https://cibuildwheel.readthedocs.io/>`__ may be one way to achieve this.
|
||
|
||
The Android wheel tag format should also be added to the list of tags accepted
|
||
by PyPI.
|
||
|
||
|
||
PEP 11 Update
|
||
-------------
|
||
|
||
:pep:`11` will be updated to include the two supported Android ABIs. Autoconf
|
||
already identifies them with the following triplets:
|
||
|
||
* ``aarch64-linux-android``
|
||
* ``x86_64-linux-android``
|
||
|
||
Petr Viktorin will serve as the initial core team contact for these ABIs.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Backwards Compatibility
|
||
=======================
|
||
|
||
Adding a new platform does not introduce any backwards compatibility concerns to
|
||
CPython itself. However, there may be some backwards compatibility implications
|
||
on the projects that have historically provided CPython support (i.e., BeeWare
|
||
and Kivy) if the final form of any CPython patches don't align with the patches
|
||
they have historically used.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Security Implications
|
||
=====================
|
||
|
||
Adding a new platform does not add any new security implications.
|
||
|
||
|
||
How to Teach This
|
||
=================
|
||
|
||
The education needs related to this PEP relate to two groups of developers.
|
||
|
||
First, developers of *apps* need to know how to build Python into an Android
|
||
app, along with their own Python code and any supporting packages, and how to
|
||
use them all at runtime. The documentation will cover this in a similar form to
|
||
the existing `Windows embeddable package
|
||
<https://docs.python.org/3/using/windows.html#the-embeddable-package>`__.
|
||
However, it will recommend most developers to use higher-level tools such as
|
||
`Briefcase <https://briefcase.readthedocs.io/en/stable/>`__,
|
||
`Chaquopy <https://chaquo.com/chaquopy/>`__ and `Buildozer
|
||
<https://buildozer.readthedocs.io/en/latest/>`__, all of which already have
|
||
comprehensive documentation.
|
||
|
||
Second, developers of *packages* with binary components need to know how to
|
||
build and release them for Android (see `Packaging`_).
|
||
|
||
|
||
Reference Implementation
|
||
========================
|
||
|
||
The `Chaquopy repository
|
||
<https://github.com/chaquo/chaquopy/tree/master/target>`__ contains a reference
|
||
patch and build scripts. These will have to be decoupled from the other
|
||
components of Chaquopy before they can be upstreamed.
|
||
|
||
`Briefcase <https://briefcase.readthedocs.org>`__ provides a reference
|
||
implementation of code to execute test suites on Android devices and emulators.
|
||
The `Toga Testbed <https://github.com/beeware/toga/tree/main/testbed>`__ is an
|
||
example of a test suite that is executed on the Android emulator using GitHub
|
||
Actions.
|
||
|
||
|
||
Copyright
|
||
=========
|
||
|
||
This document is placed in the public domain or under the CC0-1.0-Universal
|
||
license, whichever is more permissive.
|