python-peps/pep-0394.txt

208 lines
9.9 KiB
Plaintext

PEP: 394
Title: The "python" Command on Unix-Like Systems
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Kerrick Staley <mail@kerrickstaley.com>,
Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
Status: Draft
Type: Informational
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 02-Mar-2011
Post-History: 04-Mar-2011, 20-Jul-2011
Abstract
========
This PEP provides a convention to ensure that Python scripts can continue to
be portable across ``*nix`` systems, regardless of the default version of the
Python interpreter (i.e. the version invoked by the ``python`` command).
* ``python2`` will refer to some version of Python 2.x
* ``python3`` will refer to some version of Python 3.x
* ``python`` *should* refer to the same target as ``python2`` but *may*
refer to ``python3`` on some bleeding edge distributions
Recommendation
==============
* Unix-like software distributions (including systems like Mac OS X and
Cygwin) should install the ``python2`` command into the default path
whenever a version of the Python 2 interpreter is installed, and the same
for ``python3`` and the Python 3 interpreter.
* When invoked, ``python2`` should run some version of the Python 2
interpreter, and ``python3`` should run some version of the Python 3
interpreter.
* Similarly, the more general ``python`` command should be installed whenever
any version of Python is installed and should invoke the same version of
Python as either ``python2`` or ``python3``.
* For the time being, it is recommended that ``python`` should refer to
``python2`` (however, some distributions have already chosen otherwise; see
Notes below).
* The Python 2.x ``idle``, ``pydoc``, and ``python-config`` commands should
likewise be available as ``idle2``, ``pydoc2``, and ``python2-config``,
with the original commands invoking these versions by default, but possibly
invoking the Python 3.x versions instead if configured to do so by the
system administrator.
* In order to tolerate differences across platforms, all new code that needs
to invoke the Python interpreter should not specify ``python``, but rather
should specify either ``python2`` or ``python3`` (or the more specific
``python2.x`` and ``python3.x`` versions; see the Notes).
This distinction should be made in shebangs, when invoking from a shell
script, when invoking via the system() call, or when invoking in any other
context.
* One exception to this is scripts that are deliberately written to be source
compatible with both Python 2.x and 3.x. Such scripts may continue to use
``python`` on their shebang line without affecting their portability.
* When reinvoking the interpreter from a Python script, querying
``sys.executable`` to avoid hardcoded assumptions regarding the
interpreter location remains the preferred approach.
These recommendations are the outcome of the relevant python-dev discussion in
March and July 2011 [1][2] (NOTE: More accurately, they will be such once the
"Draft" status disappears from the PEP header, it has been moved into the
"Other Informational PEP" section in PEP 0 and this note has been deleted)
Rationale
=========
This is needed as, even though the majority of distributions still alias the
``python`` command to Python 2, some now alias it to Python 3. Some of
the former also do not provide a ``python2`` command; hence, there is
currently no way for Python 2 code (or any code that invokes the Python 2
interpreter directly rather than via ``sys.executable``) to reliably run on
all Unix-like systems without modification, as the ``python`` command will
invoke the wrong interpreter version on some systems, and the ``python2``
command will fail completely on others. The recommendations in this PEP
provide a very simple mechanism to restore cross-platform support, with
minimal additional work required on the part of distribution maintainers.
Notes
=====
* Distributions that only include ``python3`` in their base install (i.e.
they do not provide ``python2`` by default) along with those that are
aggressively trying to reach that point (and are willing to break third
party scripts while attempting to get there) are already beginning to alias
the ``python`` command to ``python3``
* More conservative distributions that are less willing to tolerate breakage
of third party scripts continue to alias it to ``python2``. Until the
conventions described in this PEP are more widely adopted, having ``python``
invoke ``python2`` will remain the recommended option.
* The ``pythonX.X`` (e.g. ``python2.6``) commands exist on some systems, on
which they invoke specific minor versions of the Python interpreter. It
can be useful for distribution-specific packages to take advantage of these
utilities if they exist, since it will prevent code breakage if the default
minor version of a given major version is changed. However, scripts
intending to be cross-platform should not rely on the presence of these
utilities, but rather should be tested on several recent minor versions of
the target major version, compensating, if necessary, for the small
differences that exist between minor versions. This prevents the need for
sysadmins to install many very similar versions of the interpreter.
* When the ``pythonX.X`` binaries are provided by a distribution, the
``python2`` and ``python3`` commands should refer to one of those files
rather being provided as a separate binary file.
* It is suggested that even distribution-specific packages follow the
``python2``/``python3`` convention, even in code that is not intended to
operate on other distributions. This will prevent problems if the
distribution later decides to change the version of the Python interpreter
that the ``python`` command invokes, or if a sysadmin installs a custom
``python`` command with a different major version than the distribution
default. Distributions can test whether they are fully following this
convention by changing the ``python`` interpreter on a test box and checking
to see if anything breaks.
* If the above point is adhered to and sysadmins are permitted to change the
``python`` command, then the ``python`` command should always be implemented
as a link to the interpreter binary (or a link to a link) and not vice
versa. That way, if a sysadmin does decide to replace the installed
``python`` file, they can do so without inadvertently deleting the
previously installed binary.
* As an alternative to the recommendation presented above, some distributions
may choose to leave the ``python`` command itself undefined, leaving
sysadmins and users with the responsibility to choose their own preferred
version to be made available as the ``python`` command.
* If the Python 2 interpreter becomes uncommon, scripts should nevertheless
continue to use the ``python3`` convention rather that just ``python``. This
will ease transition in the event that yet another major version of Python
is released.
* If these conventions are adhered to, it will be the case that the ``python``
command is only executed in an interactive manner.
Backwards Compatibility
=========================
A potential problem can arise if a script adhering to the
``python2``/``python3`` convention is executed on a system not supporting
these commands. This is mostly a non-issue, since the sysadmin can simply
create these symbolic links and avoid further problems. It is a significantly
more obvious breakage than the sometimes cryptic errors that can arise when
attempting to execute a script containing Python 2 specific syntax with a
Python 3 interpreter.
Application to the CPython Reference Interpreter
================================================
While technically a new feature, the ``make install`` command in the 2.7
version of CPython will be adjusted to create the ``python2.7``, ``idle2.7``,
``pydoc2.7``, and ``python2.7-config`` binaries, with ``python2``, ``idle2``,
``pydoc2``, and ``python2-config`` as hard links to the respective binaries,
and ``python``, ``idle``, ``pydoc``, and ``python-config`` as symbolic links
to the respective hard links. This feature will first appear in CPython
2.7.3.
The ``make install`` command in the CPython 3.x series will similarly install
the ``python3.x``, ``idle3.x``, ``pydoc3.x``, and ``python3.x-config``
binaries (with appropriate ``x``), and ``python3``, ``idle3``, ``pydoc3``,
and ``python3-config`` as hard links. This feature will first appear in
CPython 3.3.
Similar adjustments will be made to the Mac OS X binary installer.
As implementation of these features in the default installers does not alter
the recommendations in this PEP, the implementation progress is managed on the
tracker as issue #12627 [3].
Impact on PYTHON* Environment Variables
=======================================
The choice of target for the ``python`` command implicitly affects a
distribution's expected interpretation of the various Python related
environment variables. The use of ``*.pth`` files in the relevant
``site-packages`` folder, the "per-user site packages" feature (see
``python -m site``) or more flexible tools such as ``virtualenv`` are all more
tolerant of the presence of multiple versions of Python on a system than the
direct use of ``PYTHONPATH``.
Exclusion of MS Windows
=======================
This PEP deliberately excludes any proposals relating to Microsoft Windows, as
devising an equivalent solution for Windows was deemed too complex to handle
here. PEP 397 and the related discussion on the python-dev mailing list
address this issue.
References
==========
[1] Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream (with bonus grammar class!)
(http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-March/108491.html)
[2] Rebooting PEP 394 (aka Support the /usr/bin/python2 symlink upstream)
(http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2011-July/112322.html)
[3] Implement PEP 394 in the CPython Makefile
(http://bugs.python.org/issue12627)
Copyright
===========
This document has been placed in the public domain.