218 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
218 lines
7.6 KiB
Plaintext
PEP: 6
|
|
Title: Bug Fix Releases
|
|
Author: Aahz <aahz@pythoncraft.com>, Anthony Baxter <anthony@interlink.com.au>
|
|
Status: Active
|
|
Type: Process
|
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
|
Created: 15-Mar-2001
|
|
Post-History: 15-Mar-2001, 18-Apr-2001, 19-Aug-2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
========
|
|
|
|
Python has historically had only a single fork of development, with
|
|
releases having the combined purpose of adding new features and
|
|
delivering bug fixes (these kinds of releases will be referred to as
|
|
"major releases"). This PEP describes how to fork off maintenance, or
|
|
bug fix, releases of old versions for the primary purpose of fixing
|
|
bugs.
|
|
|
|
This PEP is not, repeat NOT, a guarantee of the existence of bug fix
|
|
releases; it only specifies a procedure to be followed if bug fix
|
|
releases are desired by enough of the Python community willing to do
|
|
the work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Motivation
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
With the move to SourceForge, Python development has accelerated.
|
|
There is a sentiment among part of the community that there was too
|
|
much acceleration, and many people are uncomfortable with upgrading to
|
|
new versions to get bug fixes when so many features have been added,
|
|
sometimes late in the development cycle.
|
|
|
|
One solution for this issue is to maintain the previous major release,
|
|
providing bug fixes until the next major release. This should make
|
|
Python more attractive for enterprise development, where Python may
|
|
need to be installed on hundreds or thousands of machines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prohibitions
|
|
============
|
|
|
|
Bug fix releases are required to adhere to the following restrictions:
|
|
|
|
1. There must be zero syntax changes. All `.pyc` and `.pyo` files must
|
|
work (no regeneration needed) with all bugfix releases forked off
|
|
from a major release.
|
|
|
|
2. There must be zero pickle changes.
|
|
|
|
3. There must be no incompatible C API changes. All extensions must
|
|
continue to work without recompiling in all bugfix releases in the
|
|
same fork as a major release.
|
|
|
|
Breaking any of these prohibitions requires a BDFL proclamation (and a
|
|
prominent warning in the release notes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not-Quite-Prohibitions
|
|
======================
|
|
|
|
Where possible, bug fix releases should also:
|
|
|
|
1. Have no new features. The purpose of a bug fix release is to fix
|
|
bugs, not add the latest and greatest whizzo feature from the HEAD
|
|
of the CVS root.
|
|
|
|
2. Be a painless upgrade. Users should feel confident that an upgrade
|
|
from 2.x.y to 2.x.(y+1) will not break their running systems. This
|
|
means that, unless it is necessary to fix a bug, the standard
|
|
library should not change behavior, or worse yet, APIs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applicability of Prohibitions
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
The above prohibitions and not-quite-prohibitions apply both for a
|
|
final release to a bugfix release (for instance, 2.4 to 2.4.1) and for
|
|
one bugfix release to the next in a series (for instance 2.4.1 to
|
|
2.4.2).
|
|
|
|
Following the prohibitions listed in this PEP should help keep the
|
|
community happy that a bug fix release is a painless and safe upgrade.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Helping the Bug Fix Releases Happen
|
|
===================================
|
|
|
|
Here's a few pointers on helping the bug fix release process along.
|
|
|
|
1. Backport bug fixes. If you fix a bug, and it seems appropriate,
|
|
port it to the CVS branch for the current bug fix release. If
|
|
you're unwilling or unable to backport it yourself, make a note in
|
|
the commit message, with words like 'Bugfix candidate' or
|
|
'Backport candidate'.
|
|
|
|
2. If you're not sure, ask. Ask the person managing the current bug
|
|
fix releases if they think a particular fix is appropriate.
|
|
|
|
3. If there's a particular bug you'd particularly like fixed in a bug
|
|
fix release, jump up and down and try to get it done. Do not wait
|
|
until 48 hours before a bug fix release is due, and then start
|
|
asking for bug fixes to be included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version Numbers
|
|
===============
|
|
|
|
Starting with Python 2.0, all major releases are required to have a
|
|
version number of the form X.Y; bugfix releases will always be of the
|
|
form X.Y.Z.
|
|
|
|
The current major release under development is referred to as release
|
|
N; the just-released major version is referred to as N-1.
|
|
|
|
In CVS, the bug fix releases happen on a branch. For release 2.x, the
|
|
branch is named 'release2x-maint'. For example, the branch for the 2.3
|
|
maintenance releases is release23-maint
|
|
|
|
|
|
Procedure
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
The process for managing bugfix releases is modeled in part on the Tcl
|
|
system [1]_.
|
|
|
|
The Patch Czar is the counterpart to the BDFL for bugfix releases.
|
|
However, the BDFL and designated appointees retain veto power over
|
|
individual patches. A Patch Czar might only be looking after a single
|
|
branch of development - it's quite possible that a different person
|
|
might be maintaining the 2.3.x and the 2.4.x releases.
|
|
|
|
As individual patches get contributed to the current trunk of CVS,
|
|
each patch committer is requested to consider whether the patch is a
|
|
bug fix suitable for inclusion in a bugfix release. If the patch is
|
|
considered suitable, the committer can either commit the release to
|
|
the maintenance branch, or else mark the patch in the commit message.
|
|
|
|
In addition, anyone from the Python community is free to suggest
|
|
patches for inclusion. Patches may be submitted specifically for
|
|
bugfix releases; they should follow the guidelines in :pep:`3`. In
|
|
general, though, it's probably better that a bug in a specific release
|
|
also be fixed on the HEAD as well as the branch.
|
|
|
|
The Patch Czar decides when there are a sufficient number of patches
|
|
to warrant a release. The release gets packaged up, including a
|
|
Windows installer, and made public. If any new bugs are found, they
|
|
must be fixed immediately and a new bugfix release publicized (with an
|
|
incremented version number). For the 2.3.x cycle, the Patch Czar
|
|
(Anthony) has been trying for a release approximately every six
|
|
months, but this should not be considered binding in any way on any
|
|
future releases.
|
|
|
|
Bug fix releases are expected to occur at an interval of roughly six
|
|
months. This is only a guideline, however - obviously, if a major bug
|
|
is found, a bugfix release may be appropriate sooner. In general, only
|
|
the N-1 release will be under active maintenance at any time. That is,
|
|
during Python 2.4's development, Python 2.3 gets bugfix releases. If,
|
|
however, someone qualified wishes to continue the work to maintain an
|
|
older release, they should be encouraged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patch Czar History
|
|
==================
|
|
|
|
Anthony Baxter is the Patch Czar for 2.3.1 through 2.3.4.
|
|
|
|
Barry Warsaw is the Patch Czar for 2.2.3.
|
|
|
|
Guido van Rossum is the Patch Czar for 2.2.2.
|
|
|
|
Michael Hudson is the Patch Czar for 2.2.1.
|
|
|
|
Anthony Baxter is the Patch Czar for 2.1.2 and 2.1.3.
|
|
|
|
Thomas Wouters is the Patch Czar for 2.1.1.
|
|
|
|
Moshe Zadka is the Patch Czar for 2.0.1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
History
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
This PEP started life as a proposal on comp.lang.python. The original
|
|
version suggested a single patch for the N-1 release to be released
|
|
concurrently with the N release. The original version also argued for
|
|
sticking with a strict bug fix policy.
|
|
|
|
Following feedback from the BDFL and others, the draft PEP was written
|
|
containing an expanded bugfix release cycle that permitted any
|
|
previous major release to obtain patches and also relaxed the strict
|
|
bug fix requirement (mainly due to the example of :pep:`235`, which
|
|
could be argued as either a bug fix or a feature).
|
|
|
|
Discussion then mostly moved to python-dev, where BDFL finally issued
|
|
a proclamation basing the Python bugfix release process on Tcl's,
|
|
which essentially returned to the original proposal in terms of being
|
|
only the N-1 release and only bug fixes, but allowing multiple bugfix
|
|
releases until release N is published.
|
|
|
|
Anthony Baxter then took this PEP and revised it, based on lessons
|
|
from the 2.3 release cycle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
References
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
.. [1] http://www.tcl.tk/cgi-bin/tct/tip/28.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright
|
|
=========
|
|
|
|
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|