The JUnit resource has a couple bugs in both the send and receive path
that result in only one message being received if the receive method is
called repeatedly and some send drop the provided properties. Cleaned up
some tests to the point of showing the errors and ensuring that at least
basic functionality is tested.
- interrupted message breaking reference counting
After the server writing to the client is interrupted in AMQP, the reference counting was broken what would require the server restarted
in order to cleanup the files of any interrupted sends.
- Removed consumer during large message delivery damaging large messages
If the consumer failed to deliver messages for any reason, the message on the queue would be duplicated. what would wipe out the body of the message
and other journal errors would happen because of this.
extra debug capabilities added into RefCountMessage as part of ARTEMIS-4206 in order to identify these issues
This commit fixes the following things:
- Moves connection audit logging to the resource audit logger instead
of using a dedicated logger as that would adversely impact upgrading
users, and arguably didn't make sense in the first place.
- Mitigates an potential NPE w.r.t. connection ID.
- Updates the "dummy" management connection to return a valid
connection ID.
This test is boundless adding data into the journal when there are no syncs.
That's creating 600MIB worth of data on our CIs, and this tests was not meant to be acting like a soak test.
I'm limitting the load the test can generate with a TokenBucketLimiterImpl now.
MQTT5Test::testMaxMessageSize is spiking the memory on the integration testsuite all the way up to 1.5G
what makes this test more like a soak test.
The test is now converted to use a real server like other Soak Tests.
This fix will delay the message.copy to the redistributor itself.
Meaning no copy would be performed if the redistribution itself failed.
No need to remove a copy any longer
The federated queue consumer has to generate a new id for the messages
received from the upstream broker because they have an id generated by
the store manager of the upstream broker.
Co-authored-by: Clebert Suconic <clebertsuconic@apache.org>
- redistribute received the handle call, it then copies the message
- the routing table changes
- the message is left behind
With the new version of the server these messages will be removed. But we should remove these right away
Basically I started the testsuite and attached check leak with "java -jar check-leak.jar --pid <pid> --report testsuite-report --sleep 1000" and saw the allocations of this were pretty high.
Robbie Gemmell
Emmanuel Hugonnet
Clebert Suconic
Timothy Bish
Justin Bertram
Alexey Markevich
Domenico Francesco Bruscino