When sending, for example, to a predefined anycast address and queue
from a multicast (JMS topic) producer, the routed count on the address
is incremented, but the message count on the matching queue is not. No
indication is given at the client end that the messages failed to get
routed - the messages are just silently dropped.
Fixing this problem requires a slight semantic change. The broker is now
more strict in what it allows specifically with regards to
auto-creation. If, for example, a JMS application attempts to send a
message to a topic and the corresponding multicast address doesn't exist
already or the broker cannot automatically create it or update it then
sending the message will fail.
Also, part of this commit moves a chunk of auto-create logic into
ServerSession and adds an enum for auto-create results. Aside from
helping fix this specific issue this can serve as a foundation for
de-duplicating the auto-create logic spread across many of the protocol
implementations.
Attempt to standardize all Logger declaration to a singular variable name
which makes the code more consistent and make finding usages of loggers in
the code a bit easier.
By allowing to pass caller's classname directly to org.apache.activemq.artemis.utils.ActiveMQThreadFactory#defaultThreadFactory instead of calculating it from stack.
JGroups 3.x hasn't been updated in some time now. The last release was
in April 2020 almost 2 years ago. Lots of protocols have been updated
and added and users are wanting to use them. There is also increasing
concern about using older components triggered mainly by other
recently-discovered high-profile vulnerabilities in the wider Open
Source Java community.
This commit bumps JGroups up to the latest release - 5.2.0.Final.
However, there is a cost associated with upgrading.
The old-style properties configuration is no longer supported. I think
it's unlikely that end-users are leveraging this because it is not
exposed via broker.xml. The JGroups XML configuration has been around
for a long time, is widely adopted, and is still supported. I expect
most (if not all) users are using this. However, a handful of tests
needed to be updated and/or removed to deal with this absence.
Some protocols and/or protocol properties are no longer supported. This
means that users may have to change their JGroups stack configurations
when they upgrade. For example, our own clustered-jgroups example had to
be updated or it wouldn't run properly.
Clebert Suconic
a181321
Justin Bertram
Ryan Highley
Robbie Gemmell
hawkdshrh
Timothy Bish
Rico Neubauer
Emmanuel Hugonnet
Jacob Middag
Domenico Francesco Bruscino
Asukwo-comfort