199 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
199 lines
8.8 KiB
Markdown
# Message Grouping
|
|
|
|
Message groups are sets of messages that have the following characteristics:
|
|
|
|
- Messages in a message group share the same group id, i.e. they have same
|
|
group identifier property (`JMSXGroupID` for JMS, `_AMQ_GROUP_ID` for Apache
|
|
ActiveMQ Artemis Core API).
|
|
|
|
- Messages in a message group are always consumed by the same consumer, even if
|
|
there are many consumers on a queue. They pin all messages with the same
|
|
group id to the same consumer. If that consumer closes another consumer is
|
|
chosen and will receive all messages with the same group id.
|
|
|
|
Message groups are useful when you want all messages for a certain value of the
|
|
property to be processed serially by the same consumer.
|
|
|
|
An example might be orders for a certain stock. You may want orders for any
|
|
particular stock to be processed serially by the same consumer. To do this you
|
|
can create a pool of consumers (perhaps one for each stock, but less will work
|
|
too), then set the stock name as the value of the _AMQ_GROUP_ID property.
|
|
|
|
This will ensure that all messages for a particular stock will always be
|
|
processed by the same consumer.
|
|
|
|
> **Note:**
|
|
>
|
|
> Grouped messages can impact the concurrent processing of non-grouped messages
|
|
> due to the underlying FIFO semantics of a queue. For example, if there is a
|
|
> chunk of 100 grouped messages at the head of a queue followed by 1,000
|
|
> non-grouped messages then all the grouped messages will need to be sent to
|
|
> the appropriate client (which is consuming those grouped messages serially)
|
|
> before any of the non-grouped messages can be consumed. The functional impact
|
|
> in this scenario is a temporary suspension of concurrent message processing
|
|
> while all the grouped messages are processed. This can be a performance
|
|
> bottleneck so keep it in mind when determining the size of your message
|
|
> groups, and consider whether or not you should isolate your grouped messages
|
|
> from your non-grouped messages.
|
|
|
|
## Using Core API
|
|
|
|
The property name used to identify the message group is `"_AMQ_GROUP_ID"` (or
|
|
the constant `MessageImpl.HDR_GROUP_ID`). Alternatively, you can set
|
|
`autogroup` to true on the `SessionFactory` which will pick a random unique id.
|
|
|
|
## Using JMS
|
|
|
|
The property name used to identify the message group is `JMSXGroupID`.
|
|
|
|
```java
|
|
// send 2 messages in the same group to ensure the same
|
|
// consumer will receive both
|
|
Message message = ...
|
|
message.setStringProperty("JMSXGroupID", "Group-0");
|
|
producer.send(message);
|
|
|
|
message = ...
|
|
message.setStringProperty("JMSXGroupID", "Group-0");
|
|
producer.send(message);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, you can set `autogroup` to true on the
|
|
`ActiveMQConnectonFactory` which will pick a random unique id. This can also be
|
|
set in the JNDI context environment, e.g. `jndi.properties`. Here's a simple
|
|
example using the "ConnectionFactory" connection factory which is available in
|
|
the context by default
|
|
|
|
```properties
|
|
java.naming.factory.initial=org.apache.activemq.artemis.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory
|
|
connectionFactory.myConnectionFactory=tcp://localhost:61616?autoGroup=true
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Alternatively you can set the group id via the connection factory. All messages
|
|
sent with producers created via this connection factory will set the
|
|
`JMSXGroupID` to the specified value on all messages sent. This can also be set
|
|
in the JNDI context environment, e.g. `jndi.properties`. Here's a simple
|
|
example using the "ConnectionFactory" connection factory which is available in
|
|
the context by default:
|
|
|
|
```properties
|
|
java.naming.factory.initial=org.apache.activemq.artemis.jndi.ActiveMQInitialContextFactory
|
|
connectionFactory.myConnectionFactory=tcp://localhost:61616?groupID=Group-0
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Closing a Message Group
|
|
You generally don't need to close a message group, you just keep using it.
|
|
|
|
However if you really do want to close a group you can add a negative sequence number.
|
|
|
|
Example:
|
|
```java
|
|
Mesasge message = session.createTextMessage("<foo>hey</foo>");
|
|
message.setStringProperty("JMSXGroupID", "Group-0");
|
|
message.setIntProperty("JMSXGroupSeq", -1);
|
|
...
|
|
producer.send(message);
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
This then closes the message group so if another message is sent in the future with the same message group ID it will be reassigned to a new consumer.
|
|
|
|
## Example
|
|
|
|
See the [Message Group Example](examples.md#message-group) which shows how
|
|
message groups are configured and used with JMS and via a connection factory.
|
|
|
|
## Clustered Grouping
|
|
|
|
Using message groups in a cluster is a bit more complex. This is because
|
|
messages with a particular group id can arrive on any node so each node needs
|
|
to know about which group id's are bound to which consumer on which node. The
|
|
consumer handling messages for a particular group id may be on a different node
|
|
of the cluster, so each node needs to know this information so it can route the
|
|
message correctly to the node which has that consumer.
|
|
|
|
To solve this there is the notion of a grouping handler. Each node will have
|
|
its own grouping handler and when a messages is sent with a group id assigned,
|
|
the handlers will decide between them which route the message should take.
|
|
|
|
Here is a sample config for each type of handler. This should be configured in
|
|
`broker.xml`.
|
|
|
|
```xml
|
|
<grouping-handler name="my-grouping-handler">
|
|
<type>LOCAL</type>
|
|
<address>jms</address>
|
|
<timeout>5000</timeout>
|
|
</grouping-handler>
|
|
|
|
<grouping-handler name="my-grouping-handler">
|
|
<type>REMOTE</type>
|
|
<address>jms</address>
|
|
<timeout>5000</timeout>
|
|
</grouping-handler>
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- `type` two types of handlers are supported - `LOCAL` and `REMOTE`. Each
|
|
cluster should choose 1 node to have a `LOCAL` grouping handler and all the
|
|
other nodes should have `REMOTE` handlers. It's the `LOCAL` handler that
|
|
actually makes the decision as to what route should be used, all the other
|
|
`REMOTE` handlers converse with this.
|
|
|
|
- `address` refers to a [cluster connection and the address it
|
|
uses](clusters.md#configuring-cluster-connections). Refer to the clustering
|
|
section on how to configure clusters.
|
|
|
|
- `timeout` how long to wait for a decision to be made. An exception will be
|
|
thrown during the send if this timeout is reached, this ensures that strict
|
|
ordering is kept.
|
|
|
|
The decision as to where a message should be routed to is initially proposed by
|
|
the node that receives the message. The node will pick a suitable route as per
|
|
the normal clustered routing conditions, i.e. round robin available queues,
|
|
use a local queue first and choose a queue that has a consumer. If the proposal
|
|
is accepted by the grouping handlers the node will route messages to this queue
|
|
from that point on, if rejected an alternative route will be offered and the
|
|
node will again route to that queue indefinitely. All other nodes will also
|
|
route to the queue chosen at proposal time. Once the message arrives at the
|
|
queue then normal single server message group semantics take over and the
|
|
message is pinned to a consumer on that queue.
|
|
|
|
You may have noticed that there is a single point of failure with the single
|
|
local handler. If this node crashes then no decisions will be able to be made.
|
|
Any messages sent will be not be delivered and an exception thrown. To avoid
|
|
this happening Local Handlers can be replicated on another backup node. Simple
|
|
create your back up node and configure it with the same Local handler.
|
|
|
|
## Clustered Grouping Best Practices
|
|
|
|
Some best practices should be followed when using clustered grouping:
|
|
|
|
1. Make sure your consumers are distributed evenly across the different nodes
|
|
if possible. This is only an issue if you are creating and closing
|
|
consumers regularly. Since messages are always routed to the same queue once
|
|
pinned, removing a consumer from this queue may leave it with no consumers
|
|
meaning the queue will just keep receiving the messages. Avoid closing
|
|
consumers or make sure that you always have plenty of consumers, i.e., if you
|
|
have 3 nodes have 3 consumers.
|
|
|
|
2. Use durable queues if possible. If queues are removed once a group is bound
|
|
to it, then it is possible that other nodes may still try to route messages
|
|
to it. This can be avoided by making sure that the queue is deleted by the
|
|
session that is sending the messages. This means that when the next message is
|
|
sent it is sent to the node where the queue was deleted meaning a new proposal
|
|
can successfully take place. Alternatively you could just start using a
|
|
different group id.
|
|
|
|
3. Always make sure that the node that has the Local Grouping Handler is
|
|
replicated. These means that on failover grouping will still occur.
|
|
|
|
4. In case you are using group-timeouts, the remote node should have a smaller
|
|
group-timeout with at least half of the value on the main coordinator. This
|
|
is because this will determine how often the last-time-use value should be
|
|
updated with a round trip for a request to the group between the nodes.
|
|
|
|
## Clustered Grouping Example
|
|
|
|
See the [Clustered Grouping Example](examples.md#clustered-grouping) which
|
|
shows how to configure message groups with a ActiveMQ Artemis Cluster.
|