mirror of https://github.com/apache/druid.git
41 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
41 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
layout: doc_page
|
|
title: "Apache Druid (incubating) vs Kudu"
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
<!--
|
|
~ Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
|
|
~ or more contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file
|
|
~ distributed with this work for additional information
|
|
~ regarding copyright ownership. The ASF licenses this file
|
|
~ to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
|
|
~ "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
|
|
~ with the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
~
|
|
~ http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
~
|
|
~ Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
|
|
~ software distributed under the License is distributed on an
|
|
~ "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
|
|
~ KIND, either express or implied. See the License for the
|
|
~ specific language governing permissions and limitations
|
|
~ under the License.
|
|
-->
|
|
|
|
# Apache Druid (incubating) vs Apache Kudu
|
|
|
|
Kudu's storage format enables single row updates, whereas updates to existing Druid segments requires recreating the segment, so theoretically
|
|
the process for updating old values should be higher latency in Druid. However, the requirements in Kudu for maintaining extra head space to store
|
|
updates as well as organizing data by id instead of time has the potential to introduce some extra latency and accessing
|
|
of data that is not need to answer a query at query time.
|
|
|
|
Druid summarizes/rollups up data at ingestion time, which in practice reduces the raw data that needs to be
|
|
stored significantly (up to 40 times on average), and increases performance of scanning raw data significantly.
|
|
Druid segments also contain bitmap indexes for fast filtering, which Kudu does not currently support.
|
|
Druid's segment architecture is heavily geared towards fast aggregates and filters, and for OLAP workflows. Appends are very
|
|
fast in Druid, whereas updates of older data is higher latency. This is by design as the data Druid is good for is typically event data,
|
|
and does not need to be updated too frequently. Kudu supports arbitrary primary keys with uniqueness constraints, and
|
|
efficient lookup by ranges of those keys. Kudu chooses not to include the execution engine, but supports sufficient
|
|
operations so as to allow node-local processing from the execution engines. This means that Kudu can support multiple frameworks on the same data (eg MR, Spark, and SQL).
|
|
Druid includes its own query layer that allows it to push down aggregations and computations directly to data processes for faster query processing.
|