15c03fd1c9
- Testing by executing a command will cover the exact path users will trigger, so its better then directly calling library functions in tests. Changing the tests to use @shell.command(:<command>, args) to execute them like it's a command coming from shell. Norm change: Commands should print the output user would like to see, but in the end, should also return the relevant value. This way: - Tests can use returned value to check that functionality works - Tests can capture stdout to assert particular kind of output user should see. - We do not print the return value in interactive mode and keep the output clean. See Shell.command() function. Bugs found due to this change: - Uncovered bug in major_compact.rb with this approach. It was calling admin.majorCompact() which doesn't exist but our tests didn't catch it since they directly tested admin.major_compact() - Enabled TestReplicationShell. If it's bad, flaky infra will take care of it. Change-Id: I5d8af16bf477a79a2f526a5bf11c245b02b7d276 |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
src | ||
pom.xml |