Some of the test methods were commented out when this test class was added. They got later removed
but the removal left unused method behind. I also adjusted visibility of all the internal methods
that were public and should have been private, which led me to further clean up: `MatchingHitCollector`
was not needed and can be removed.
`Operations#repeat` currently creates an automaton that has one more final
state, and 2x more transitions for each of the final states. With this change,
the returned automaton has a single final state and only 2x more transitions
for state 0.
The queue is created as 1000 * mulFactor, but the test succeeds without the 1000 factor.
That causes out of memories as the mulFactor can be as high as 4096 in some cases, and then
each slice will get a collector with a queue of size 1000 * mulFactor. Only the allocation of
such queue makes the test go OOM.
Closes#11754
Neither this method nor any of the two overrides can throw an IOException.
This change removes the throws clauses from this method in order simplify
not have to handle them on the callers side.
This commit modifies ReadTask to no longer call the deprecated search(Query, Collector).
Instead, it creates a collector manager and calls search(Query, CollectorManager).
The existing protected createCollector method is removed in favour of createCollectorManager that returns
now a CollectorManager in place of a Collector.
SearchWithCollectorTask works the same way if "topScoreDoc" is provided as config. Loading of a custom collector
will no longer work, and needs to be replaced with loading a collector manager by class name instead.
Revert changes by #12150 in jar-checks.gradle, because tasks in this file share internal state between tasks without using files. Because of this all tasks here must always execute together, so they cannot define task outputs.
Advancing within a block consists of finding the first index within an array of
128 values whose value is greater than or equal a target. Given the small size,
it's not obvious whether it's better to perform a linear search, a binary
search or something else... It is surprisingly hard to beat the linear search
that we are using today.
Experiments suggested that the following approach works in practice:
- First check if the next item in the array is greater than or equal to the
target.
- Then find the first 4-values interval that contains our target.
- Then perform a branchless binary search within this interval of 4 values.
This approach still biases heavily towards the case when the target is very
close to the current index, only a bit less than a linear search.
This commit updates the Vectorization Provider to support JDK 23. The API has not changed so the changes minimally bump the major JDK check, and enable the incubating API during testing
We can save some memory in failure scenarios here (and a tiny bit in
every case) by moving our started flag to the `FutureTask` and using the
callable outright. First of all, we save the wrapper callable, but that
also allows us to just `set(null)` on cancellation instead of waiting
for the task to run to set the `null`.
In case we have longer running tasks executing and it would take a while
to get to the cancelled tasks, this saves some memory and allows us to
return from the method earlier.
expani
expani1729
Luca Cavanna
Dawid Weiss
Adrien Grand
Chris Hegarty
Uwe Schindler
Robert Muir
Egor Potemkin
Ignacio Vera
Christoph Büscher
Michael McCandless
Stefan Vodita
Owais Kazi
pierwill
Greg Miller
Greg Miller
Mike Pellegrini
ChrisHegarty
Armin Braun
Michael Sokolov