Fixes.
This commit is contained in:
parent
2e0aabfaac
commit
3721a04979
|
@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
|
|||
<p>Here are some of the external pages mentioning Acegi Security. If you've
|
||||
found another, please let us know.
|
||||
<ul>
|
||||
<li><b><a href="http://www.springframework.org">Spring Forums</a></b>:
|
||||
<li><b><a href="http://forum.springframework.org">Spring Forums</a></b>:
|
||||
The first place to look for Acegi Security support (use the 'search' function).<br><br>
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
<li><b><a href="mail-lists.html">Acegi Security Mailing Lists</a></b>:
|
||||
|
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
|
|||
Matthew Porter wrote this good introductory article for Javalobby.<br><br>
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
<li><b><a href="http://www.almaer.com/blog/archives/000640.html">Container Managed Security: If your standard covers a lowest common denominator</a></b>:
|
||||
"For this reason I end up using something like Acegi Security", Dion comments after listing a series of missing hooks from the Servlet Spec security approach.<br><br>
|
||||
"For this reason I end up using something like Acegi Security", Dion Almaer comments after listing a series of missing hooks from the Servlet Spec security approach.<br><br>
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
<li><b><a href="http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd/20050104#re_j2ee_app_server_security">J2EE App Server Security</a></b>:
|
||||
"After using Acegi for the last month, I think I'm going to ditch the 'standard' J2EE security stuff", blogged Matt Raible. I should note
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue