Previously, the `{{mobile-nav}}` component required a `currentRouteName` property, passed from the router service. It would observe changes in this property, and update the UI accordingly.
If we change between routes which have the same `currentRouteName` (e.g. two different group message inboxes), then the `currentRouteName` does not change and does not trigger the observer. Currently in core, we are relying on the fact that currentRouteName temporarily enters a `.loading` substate during a transition. This will change when we remove the loading substate in the near future.
This commit refactors `{{mobile-nav}}` to inject the router directly, and use the `routeDidChange` event instead of an observer. The change is backwards compatible, but plugins passing the old `currentPath` property will be shown a deprecation notice.
On some modals the main/primary input field is a select-kit component (like `{{email-group-user-chooser}}` on the assign modal), so it makes sense to allow select-kit to steal focus on modals like these. This PR adds an `autofocus` option (default false) that allows select-kit to steal focus when it's rendered.
Default scopes are stored inside a class variable, which shouldn't be modified when a custom scope is added. If this happens, we're no longer to remove the scope when the plugin is disabled.
If this test ran before the new SiteSettingsController spec from 8cd7c9b259, it would fail the run. We need to `dup` the array before calling `.clear` on the original
Included:
* DEV: Span can't contains divs
* DEV: Drop extra elements
* UX: Tweak `group` layout to fix button alignment
* UX: Add space between "Members" and "(N)"
Previously we were checking truthiness in some places, and `== true` in
others. That can lead to some inconsistent UX where the interface says
the email is valid, but account creation fails.
This commit ensures values are boolean when set, and raises an error for
other value types.
If this safety check is triggered, it means the specific auth provider
needs to be updated to pass booleans.
This `if` statement was backwards, such that it was a no-op. This hasn't
caused a problem because clicking an item triggers a page load, which
destroys and recreates the component.
However, we are soon planning to remove the intermediate loading screen,
which means the component will not be removed/recreated.
https://meta.discourse.org/t/177939/202
Includes:
* DEV: Remove external plugin linting (that's covered by CI in their repositories)
* DEV: Move lint stages to a separate workflow (partial de-`if`-ication of workflows)
* DEV: Run CI on `main` branch too
* DEV: Update postgres to 13
* DEV: Update redis to 6.x
Other changes:
* DEV: Remove matrix.os
* DEV: Remove env.BUILD_TYPE
* DEV: Remove env.TARGET
* DEV: Rename `build_types` config option to `build_type`
* DEV: Lowercase `target` and `build_type` names
* DEV: Rename `ci` to `tests`
* DEV: Rename `lint` to `linting`
* DEV: Lower the wizard qunit timeout (30 min -> 10)
* DEV: Ruby version is no longer configurable
* DEV: Run plugin tests only in the `plugins` target
* DEV: Use binstubs where applicable
* DEV: We don't open PRs to `tests-passed`
* FIX: Reduce the time_read threshold to one minute.
Five minutes is too much and could fill the queue with false positives.
* Update spec/jobs/enqueue_suspect_users_spec.rb
Co-authored-by: Arpit Jalan <arpit@techapj.com>
Co-authored-by: Arpit Jalan <arpit@techapj.com>
This is an importer I wrote to restore some users that were
accidentally deleted for being purged as old staged users or old
unactivated users.
It reads from CSV files exported from a discourse sql backup.
* FIX: Subfolder replace should only affect URL prefix
Issue was reported in https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/179504
* DEV: Test subfolder handling in get-url when called twice on the same path
When running an import script there are many site settings that are
changed but we reset them back to where they were originally before the
import. However, there are two settings that we don't roll back:
```
purge_unactivated_users_grace_period_days
purge_deleted_uploads_grace_period_days
```
which could have some unintended consequences.
My first question is do we *really* have to change these settings? I'm
not a huge fan of changing someones settings without them really knowing
they were changed.
If we really do have to change these settings here is my proposed PR
where we don't alter the `purge_unactivated_users_grace_period_days` if
it has been disabled.
As I'm writing this another change we could make is that we don't change
either of these site settings if we detect that they aren't set to the
default values.
The drive behind this PR is that there is a discourse instance which
relies on staged users as part of their workflow and this setting was
changed by accident via the import script causing users to be deleted
that shouldn't have been.
Completing the discobot tutorial gives you ~3m of reading time, so we set the limit at 5m. Additionally, we use an "OR" clause to cover the case when you just scroll through a single topic.
* FIX: optimise MoveNewSinceToTable
Avoids shuffling all ids around to the app (only use min / max)
Ensure the query for boundaries is ordered by user_id
Discourse Translator Bot
David Taylor
Blake Erickson
Arpit Jalan
Osama Sayegh
Penar Musaraj
Kris
Roman Rizzi
Neil Lalonde
Jarek Radosz
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Rafael dos Santos Silva
dependabot[bot]
Martin Brennan
Sam
Jordan Vidrine