This adds a safe default to not process pop3 emails when the pop3 polling option is set up that are > 1 week old. This is to avoid the situation where an older mailbox is used, which causes us to go and process all emails in that mailbox, sending out error emails to the senders of emails which cannot be parsed successfully.
Zeitwerk simplifies working with dependencies in dev and makes it easier reloading class chains.
We no longer need to use Rails "require_dependency" anywhere and instead can just use standard
Ruby patterns to require files.
This is a far reaching change and we expect some followups here.
This change both speeds up specs (less strings to allocate) and helps catch
cases where methods in Discourse are mutating inputs.
Overall we will be migrating everything to use #frozen_string_literal: true
it will take a while, but this is the first and safest move in this direction
Since rspec-rails 3, the default installation creates two helper files:
* `spec_helper.rb`
* `rails_helper.rb`
`spec_helper.rb` is intended as a way of running specs that do not
require Rails, whereas `rails_helper.rb` loads Rails (as Discourse's
current `spec_helper.rb` does).
For more information:
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/upgrade#default-helper-files
In this commit, I've simply replaced all instances of `spec_helper` with
`rails_helper`, and renamed the original `spec_helper.rb`.
This brings the Discourse project closer to the standard usage of RSpec
in a Rails app.
At present, every spec relies on loading Rails, but there are likely
many that don't need to. In a future pull request, I hope to introduce a
separate, minimal `spec_helper.rb` which can be used in tests which
don't rely on Rails.
update rspec syntax to v3
change syntax to rspec v3
oops. fix typo
mailers classes with rspec3 syntax
helpers with rspec3 syntax
jobs with rspec3 syntax
serializers with rspec3 syntax
views with rspec3 syntax
support to rspec3 syntax
category spec with rspec3 syntax
Changed internals so trust levels are referred to with
TrustLevel[1], TrustLevel[2] etc.
This gives us much better flexibility naming trust levels, these names
are meant to be controlled by various communities.
This change has a tradeoff.
It increases our backscatter vulnerability - the subject could have spammy content - but it's extremely valuable to the user to know exactly which message was rejected.
If you sent two at the same time, and only one was rejected, you would have no way of knowing which worked and which to resend without going to the website (which is what email-in is trying to avoid, kinda).
Martin Brennan
Joffrey JAFFEUX
Krzysztof Kotlarek
Sam Saffron
Daniel Waterworth
Gerhard Schlager
Ernesto Serrano
Régis Hanol
Guo Xiang Tan
Andy Waite
Arpit Jalan
riking
Luciano Sousa