Commit Graph

23 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alan Guo Xiang Tan bfc3132bb2
SECURITY: Impose a upper bound on limit params in various controllers
What is the problem here?

In multiple controllers, we are accepting a `limit` params but do not
impose any upper bound on the values being accepted. Without an upper
bound, we may be allowing arbituary users from generating DB queries
which may end up exhausing the resources on the server.

What is the fix here?

A new `fetch_limit_from_params` helper method is introduced in
`ApplicationController` that can be used by controller actions to safely
get the limit from the params as a default limit and maximum limit has
to be set. When an invalid limit params is encountered, the server will
respond with the 400 response code.
2023-07-28 12:53:46 +01:00
Keegan George 082821c754
DEV: Remove legacy user menu (#21308) 2023-05-17 09:16:42 -07:00
David Taylor cb932d6ee1
DEV: Apply syntax_tree formatting to `spec/*` 2023-01-09 11:49:28 +00:00
Alan Guo Xiang Tan fde9e6bc25
DEV: Migrate sidebar site settings (#19336)
This new site setting replaces the
`enable_experimental_sidebar_hamburger` and `enable_sidebar` site
settings as the sidebar feature exits the experimental phase.

Note that we're replacing this without depreciation since the previous
site setting was considered experimental.

Internal Ref: /t/86563
2022-12-08 09:44:29 +08:00
Osama Sayegh 3ff6f6a5e1
FIX: Exclude claimed reviewables from user menu (#19179)
Users who can access the review queue can claim a pending reviewable(s) which means that the claimed reviewable(s) can only be handled by the user who claimed it. Currently, we show claimed reviewables in the user menu, but this can be annoying for other reviewers because they can't do anything about a reviewable claimed by someone. So this PR makes sure that we only show in the user menu reviewables that are claimed by nobody or claimed by the current user.

Internal topic: t/77235.
2022-12-01 07:09:57 +08:00
Martin Brennan c6ee28ec75
SECURITY: Hide notifications for inaccessible topics (#19208)
Filter notifications the user cannot see anymore
via guardian.can_see_topic_ids
2022-11-28 10:41:57 +10:00
Osama Sayegh 4d05e3edab
DEV: Include pending reviewables in the main tab in the user menu (#18471)
This commit makes pending reviewables show up in the main tab (a.k.a. "all notifications" tab). Pending reviewables along with unread notifications are always shown first and they're sorted based on their creation date (most recent comes first).

The dismiss button currently only shows up if there are unread notifications and it doesn't dismiss pending reviewables. We may follow up with another change soon that allows makes the dismiss button work with reviewables and remove them from the list without taking any action on them. 

Follow-up to 079450c9e4.
2022-10-05 12:30:02 +03:00
Osama Sayegh 1fa21ed415
DEV: Prioritize unread notifications in the experimental user menu (#18216)
Right now the experimental user menu sorts notifications the same way that the old menu does: unread high-priority notifications are shown first in reverse-chronological order followed by everything else also in reverse-chronological order. However, since the experimental user menu has dedicated tabs for some notification types and each tab displays a badge with the count of unread notifications in the tab, we feel like it makes sense to change how notifications are sorted in the experimental user menu to this:

1. unread high-priority notifications
2. unread regular notifications
3. all read notifications (both high-priority and regular)
4. within each group, notifications are sorted in reverse-chronological order (i.e. newest is shown first).

This new sorting logic applies to all tabs in the experimental user menu, however it doesn't change anything in the old menu. With this change, if a tab in the experimental user menu shows an unread notification badge for a really old notification, it will be surfaced to the top and prevents confusing scenarios where a user sees an unread notification badge on a tab, but the tab doesn't show the unread notification because it's too old to make it to the list.

Internal topic: t72199.
2022-09-12 21:19:25 +03:00
Osama Sayegh 062a5f316d
DEV: Wire up the dimiss button in the new notifications menu (#17745)
This commit is a subset of the changes proposed in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-08-03 15:32:35 +03:00
Osama Sayegh ce9eec8606
DEV: Combine all header notification bubbles into one in the new user menu (#17718)
Extracted from https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-08-03 08:57:59 +03:00
Phil Pirozhkov 493d437e79
Add RSpec 4 compatibility (#17652)
* Remove outdated option

04078317ba

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Use the non-globally exposed RSpec syntax, cont

https://github.com/rspec/rspec-core/pull/2803

* Comply to strict predicate matchers

See:
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1195
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1196
 - https://github.com/rspec/rspec-expectations/pull/1277
2022-07-28 10:27:38 +08:00
Osama Sayegh 9103081eb7
DEV: Add likes, mentions and replies tabs to the new user menu (#17623)
This commit is a subset of the changes proposed in https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/17379.
2022-07-25 15:19:53 +03:00
David Taylor c9dab6fd08
DEV: Automatically require 'rails_helper' in all specs (#16077)
It's very easy to forget to add `require 'rails_helper'` at the top of every core/plugin spec file, and omissions can cause some very confusing/sporadic errors.

By setting this flag in `.rspec`, we can remove the need for `require 'rails_helper'` entirely.
2022-03-01 17:50:50 +00:00
Guo Xiang Tan 16961dee76
FIX: Typo in `NotificationsController#index` not caught by tests. 2020-07-22 09:22:26 +08:00
Ahmed Gagan 04d7693355
FIX: Filter read/unread notifications on the server side (#10152)
https://meta.discourse.org/t/notifications-unread-only-filter/37621/32
2020-07-02 11:06:00 +01:00
Guo Xiang Tan 9c7d3b2dc0
FIX: Avoid marking notifications as seen in readonly mode. 2020-06-25 10:14:07 +08:00
Jarek Radosz 781e3f5e10
DEV: Use `response.parsed_body` in specs (#9615)
Most of it was autofixed with rubocop-discourse 2.1.1.
2020-05-07 17:04:12 +02:00
Guo Xiang Tan 152238b4cf DEV: Prefer `public_send` over `send`. 2019-05-07 09:33:21 +08:00
Sam Saffron 4ea21fa2d0 DEV: use #frozen_string_literal: true on all spec
This change both speeds up specs (less strings to allocate) and helps catch
cases where methods in Discourse are mutating inputs.

Overall we will be migrating everything to use #frozen_string_literal: true
it will take a while, but this is the first and safest move in this direction
2019-04-30 10:27:42 +10:00
Guo Xiang Tan 4dee7ed6d9 DEV: Fix randomlly failing spec. 2019-01-22 15:19:31 +08:00
Guo Xiang Tan 3a8f69c3d2 DEV: Assert for 200 response code to avoid changing magic helper in the future. 2018-06-07 16:11:09 +08:00
Sam 89ad2b5900 DEV: Rails 5.2 upgrade and global gem upgrade
This updates tests to use latest rails 5 practice
and updates ALL dependencies that could be updated

Performance testing shows that performance has not regressed
if anything it is marginally faster now.
2018-06-07 14:21:33 +10:00
OsamaSayegh 807223deef REFACTOR: notifications controller specs to requests 2018-06-04 16:06:53 +10:00