* DEV: Add a dedicated Admin::StaffController base controller
The current parent(Admin:AdminController) for all admin-related controllers
uses a filter that allows only staff(admin, moderator) users.
This refactor makes Admin::AdminController filter for only admins as the name suggests and
introduces a base controller dedicated for staff-related endpoints.
* DEV: Set staff-only controllers parent to Admin::StaffController
Refactor staff-only controllers to inherit newly introduced
Admin::StaffController abstract controller. This conveys the
purpose of the parent controller better unlike the previously used parent
controller.
* FIX: Follow up fixes for password-reset error page
Pass in `base_url` to the template
Use `.html_safe` since the message now contains html
Follow up to: 9b1536fb83
* Update specs to pass in the base_url
Our dialog service doesn't accept HTML by default and we shouldn't include HTML in the error message string. And given that the Ajax error handler is called in multiple contexts, it's tricky to properly support line breaks via either HTML or `\n` so we are opting for plain text in AJAX error messages.
This commit fixes a regression introduced in 8979adc where under certain conditions the groups syncing logic in Discourse Connect would try to add users to groups they're already members of and cause errors when users try to sign in using Discourse Connect.
A callback that's provided as a string, such as `{{action "doSomething"}}`, may target the method `doSomething` on the context OR the context's `action` hash (if it exists).
Having the group name in the `class` attribute can cause a clash with 'real' CSS classes. Putting it in a data attribute is much safer, and can still be targetted via CSS if desired.
Before this commit, we did not have guardian checks in place to determine if a
topic's title associated with a user badge should be displayed or not.
This means that the topic title of topics with restricted access
could be leaked to anon and users without access if certain conditions
are met. While we will not specify the conditions required, we have internally
assessed that the odds of meeting such conditions are low.
With this commit, we will now apply a guardian check to ensure that the
current user is able to see a topic before the topic's title is included
in the serialized object of a `UserBadge`.
The previous sidebar default tags and categories implementation did not
allow for a user to configure their sidebar to have no categories or
tags. This commit changes how the defaults are applied. When a user is being created,
we create the SidebarSectionLink records based on the `default_sidebar_categories` and
`default_sidebar_tags` site settings. SidebarSectionLink records are
only created for categories and tags which the user has visibility on at
the point of user creation.
With this change, we're also adding the ability for admins to apply
changes to the `default_sidebar_categories` and `default_sidebar_tags`
site settings historically when changing their site setting. When a new
category/tag has been added to the default, the new category/tag will be
added to the sidebar for all users if the admin elects to apply the changes historically.
Like wise when a tag/category is removed, the tag/category will be
removed from the sidebar for all users if the admin elects to apply the
changes historically.
Internal Ref: /t/73500
Before this commit, there was no way for us to efficiently check an
array of topics for which a user can see. Therefore, this commit
introduces the `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` method which accepts an
array of `Topic#id`s and filters out the ids which the user is not
allowed to see. The `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` method is meant to
maintain feature parity with `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic?` at all
times so a consistency check has been added in our tests to ensure that
`TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` returns the same result as
`TopicGuardian#can_see_topic?`. In the near future, the plan is for us
to switch to `TopicGuardian#can_see_topic_ids` completely but I'm not
doing that in this commit as we have to be careful with the performance
impact of such a change.
This method is currently not being used in the current commit but will
be relied on in a subsequent commit.
Classic Ember components (i.e. "@ember/component") rely upon "event
delegation" to listen for events at the application root and then dispatch
those events to any event handlers defined on individual Classic components.
This coordination is handled by Ember's EventDispatcher.
In contrast, Glimmer components (i.e. "@glimmer/component") expect event
listeners to be added to elements using modifiers (such as `{{on "click"}}`).
These event listeners are added directly to DOM elements using
`addEventListener`. There is no need for an event dispatcher.
Issues may arise when using Classic and Glimmer components together, since it
requires reconciling the two event handling approaches. For instance, event
propagation may not work as expected when a Classic component is nested
inside a Glimmer component.
`normalizeEmberEventHandling` helps an application standardize upon the
Glimmer event handling approach by eliminating usage of event delegation and
instead rewiring Classic components to directly use `addEventListener`.
Specifically, it performs the following:
- Invokes `eliminateClassicEventDelegation()` to remove all events associated
with Ember's EventDispatcher to reduce its runtime overhead and ensure that
it is effectively not in use.
- Invokes `rewireClassicComponentEvents(app)` to rewire each Classic
component to add its own event listeners for standard event handlers (e.g.
`click`, `mouseDown`, `submit`, etc.).
- Configures an instance initializer that invokes
`rewireActionModifier(appInstance)` to redefine the `action` modifier with
a substitute that uses `addEventListener`.
Additional changes include:
* d-button: only preventDefault / stopPropagation for handled actions
This allows unhandled events to propagate as expected.
* d-editor: avoid adding duplicate event listener for tests
This extra event listener causes duplicate paste events in tests.
* group-manage-email-settings: Monitor `input` instead of `change` event for checkboxes
Meta topic: https://meta.discourse.org/t/meta-theme-color-is-not-respecting-current-color-scheme/239815/7?u=osama.
This commit renders an additional `theme-color` `<meta>` tag for the dark scheme if the current user/request has a scheme selected for dark mode. We currently only render one `theme-color` tag which is always based on the user's selected scheme for light mode, but if the user also selects a scheme for dark mode and uses a device that's configured to use/prefer dark mode, the Discourse UI will be in dark mode, but any parts of the browser/OS UI that's colored based on the `theme-color` tag, would use a color from the user's selected light scheme and look inconsistent with the Discourse UI because the `theme-color` tag is based on the user's selected light scheme.
The additional `theme-color` tag has `media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)"` and is based on the user's selected dark scheme which means any browser UI that's colored based on `theme-color` tags should be able to pick the right tag based on the user's preference for light/dark mode.
The `active` param on the create user endpoint requires that an api key
is used in the request header otherwise it is ignored, so adding this
distinction to the api docs.
David Taylor
Selase Krakani
Natalie Tay
Alan Guo Xiang Tan
Osama Sayegh
Gaurang Tandon
dependabot[bot]
Blake Erickson
Penar Musaraj
Jarek Radosz
Sam
Kris
Dan Gebhardt
Gerhard Schlager
Andrei Prigorshnev
Isaac Janzen