When returning the customRenderFn from within buildCustomMarkdownCookFunction
for custom markdown engines (such as the one used by the [chat] transcripts)
we were not hoisting/unhoisting the `html_raw` tokens created by the
transcript, which meant that opts.discourse.hoisted could end up in
a state where it was null, and which caused errors and general unpleasantness.
Instead, we can just call the `cook` function that is already exported
from discourse-markdown-it, that takes care of what we did previously
plus the hoisting.
There is a companion chat commit that adds tests for this, there are
no custom markdown engine usages in core to test with.
```
warning: Passing a Node as the second parameter to Node.new is deprecated. Please pass a Document instead, or prefer an alternative constructor like Node#add_child. This will become an error in a future release of Nokogiri.
```
This commit introduces a new environment variable `RAISE_THEME_ERRORS`
that can control what happens when `theme:update` Rake task errors. It
can have three possible values: `0` to always print errors, `1` to
always raise on error, or be absent to use the default behavior which
raises errors only for default sites.
Previously email validations could fire when deleting posts if for
certain reasons any user validations fail on the user objects
This kind of condition could happen in core due to a corruption of a
user record, or via a plugin that introduces a new validation on User
Lib specs moved in 45cc16098d
Move the new selectable_avatars_mode_validator_spec to the new location
Remove the old selectable_avatars_enabled_validator_spec
follow-up of d1bdb6c65d
* FEATURE: upload an avatar option for uploading avatars with selectable avatars
Allow staff or users at or above a trust level to upload avatars even when the site
has selectable avatars enabled.
Everyone can still pick from the list of avatars. The option to upload is shown
below the selectable avatar list.
refactored boolean site setting into an enum with the following values:
disabled: No selectable avatars enabled (default)
everyone: Show selectable avatars, and allow everyone to upload custom avatars
tl1: Show selectable avatars, but require tl1+ and staff to upload custom avatars
tl2: Show selectable avatars, but require tl2+ and staff to upload custom avatars
tl3: Show selectable avatars, but require tl3+ and staff to upload custom avatars
tl4: Show selectable avatars, but require tl4 and staff to upload custom avatars
staff: Show selectable avatars, but only allow staff to upload custom avatars
no_one: Show selectable avatars. No users can upload custom avatars
Co-authored-by: Régis Hanol <regis@hanol.fr>
Currently, providing things like `filter[%24acunetix]=1` to
`UserActionsController#index` will throw an exception because instead of
getting a string as expected, we get a hash instead.
This patch simply uses `#permit` from strong parameters properly: first
we apply it on the whole parameters, this way it filters the keys we’re
interested in. By doing this, if the value is a hash for example, the
whole key/value pair will be ignored completely.
rack-mini-profiler was setting a cookie path of / which was clobbering
the session cookie path of Discourse.base_path.
Fixes some issues when local dev is unable to read or write from/to
the user session, such as during omniauth CSRF checks.
This will allow consumers (e.g. the discourse-prometheus plugin) to separate topic-timings and message-bus requests. It also fixes the is_background boolean for subfolder sites.
Example error:
```
/__w/discourse/discourse/lib/tasks/assets.rake:3: warning: already initialized constant EMBER_CLI
/__w/discourse/discourse/lib/tasks/assets.rake:3: warning: previous definition of EMBER_CLI was here
```
This commit handles the edge case where a draft is lost with no warnings if the user edits the title (or category/tags) of a topic while they're replying.to the same topic. Repro steps are as follows:
1. Start replying to a topic and type enough to get a draft saved.
2. Scroll up to the topic title and click the pencil icon next to the topic title, change the title, category and/or tags, and then save the changes.
3. Reload the page and you'll see that the draft is gone.
This happens because we only allow 1 draft per topic per user and when you edit the title of a topic that you're replying to, from the server perspective it'll look like as if you've submitted your reply so it will advance the draft sequence for the topic and delete the draft.
The fix in this commit makes `PostRevisor` skip advancing the draft sequence when a topic's title is edited using the pencil button next to the title.
Internal ticket: t60854.
Co-authored-by: Robin Ward <robin.ward@gmail.com>
Meta topic: https://meta.discourse.org/t/rtl-direction-is-broken-in-quotes/217639?u=osama.
Posts in Discourse are by default always rendered in the same direction as the rest of site, for example if the site is RTL, a post in that site is always rendered RTL even if it's made of an LTR language entirely. However, this behavior can be changed by enabling the `support mixed text direction` site setting which makes our posts rendering engine consider each "paragraph" in the post and apply an appropriate direction (using the `dir` attribute) on it based on its content/language.
I put paragraph in quotes because technically we only loop through the immediate children of the HTML element that contains the post cooked HTML and do this direction check on them. Most of the time the immediate children are actually paragraphs, but not always. The direction of an element is determined by checking its `textContent` property against a regular expression that checks all characters are RTL characters and based on the regular expression result the `dir` attribute is set on the element.
This technique doesn't work so well on quotes because they may contain multiple paragraphs which may be in different languages/directions. For example: if a site's language is Arabic (RTL language) and the `support mixed text direction` setting is enabled, regular paragraphs outside quotes are rendered as expected with the right direction depending on the paragraph's language. However, paragraphs within a quote are all (incorrectly) rendered in a single direction, LTR or RTL, regardless of whether they're of different languages/directions or not.
The reason for this is that when we're determining the direction for the quote, it's considered as one element and the direction is set on the whole quote. But for complex quotes that contain mixed paragraphs, we need to be more surgical and apply direction on individual paragraphs/elements within the quote.
This commit adds special handling for quotes to ensure that:
* the quote top bar (the avatar plus the chevron and arrow) always match the site direction
* each immediate paragraph (`<p>` elements) under `<blockquote>` in the quote gets a direction based on its content.
For before/after screenshots, see PR #16004.
This option will make it so the [quote] bbcode will always
include the HTML link to the quoted post, even if a topic_id
is not provided in the PrettyText#cook options. This is so
[quote] bbcode can be used in other places, like chat messages,
that always need the link and do not have an "off-topic" ID
to use.
The 'new' tab doesn't exist for anonymous users. Every 'new' topic also publishes a message on the `/latest` channel, so the blue banner at the top of the topic-list will still be functional
* DEV: remove duplicate code in button component template
* DEV: refactor is-loading state of d-button component
Before this change on initialisation `forceDisabled` is set `false` and then might change to `undefined` - depending on the use of the button component. This change ensures a boolean value for `forceDisabled`.
The added test works with and without the new change. The test is added as it represents the default use case for most buttons.
Previously cached counting made redis calls in main thread and performed
the flush in main thread.
This could lead to pathological states in extreme heavy load.
This refactor reduces load and cleans up the interface
Previously we were publishing one messagebus message per user which was 'tracking' a topic. On large sites, this can easily be 1000+ messages. The important information in the message is common between all users, so we can manage with a single message on a shared channel, which will be much more efficient.
For user-specific values (notification_level and last_read_post_number), the JS app can infer values which are 'good enough'. Correct values will be loaded as soon as a topic-list containing the topic is visited.
Martin Brennan
dependabot[bot]
Jarek Radosz
Ella E
Roman Rizzi
Osama Sayegh
Dan Ungureanu
Krzysztof Kotlarek
Sam
Jeff Wong
Bianca Nenciu
Kris
Jordan Vidrine
Penar Musaraj
Loïc Guitaut
David Taylor
Joffrey JAFFEUX
tshenry
Ayke Halder
Discourse Translator Bot