NewPostManager’s `post_needs_approval_in_its_category` method should allow category group moderators to create topics/reply to topics that where they have appropraite permissions.
(ie, if a user has permission to moderate a post, any posts made by them shouldn’t be sent to moderation)
* FIX: Store Reviewable's force_review as a boolean.
Using the `force_review` flag raises the score to hit the minimum visibility threshold. This strategy turned out to be ineffective on sites with a high number of flags, where these values could rapidly fluctuate.
This change adds a `force_review` column on the reviewables table and modifies the `Reviewable#list_for` method to show these items when passing the `status: :pending` option, even if the score is not high enough. ReviewableQueuedPosts and ReviewableUsers are always created using this option.
To check if a post contains any embedded media, we look if the "image_sizes" attribute is present in the new post manager arguments.
We want to see one boxed links, but we only store the raw content of the post. To work around this, I extracted the onebox logic from the composer editor into a module.
The UI prevents users from trying to create tags on topics when they
don't have permission, but if you are trying to add tags to a topic via
the API and you don't have permission before this change it would
silently succeed in creating the topic, but it wouldn't have any tags.
Now a 422 error will be returned with an error message when trying to
create a topic with tags when tagging is disabled or you don't have
enough trust level to add tags to a topic.
Bug report: https://meta.discourse.org/t/-/70525/14
* enqueue spam/dmarc failing emails instead of hiding
* add translations for dmarc/spam enqueued reasons
* unescape quote
* if email_in_authserv_id is blank return gray for all emails
If a post arrives via email but must be reviewed, we now show an
icon that can be clicked to view the raw contents of the email.
This is useful if Discourse's email parser is acting odd and the user
reviewing the post wants to know what the original contents were before
approving/rejecting the post.
We found score hard to understand. It is still there behind the scenes
for sorting purposes, but it is no longer shown.
You can now filter by minimum priority (low, med, high) instead of
score.
* Introduced fab!, a helper that creates database state for a group
It's almost identical to let_it_be, except:
1. It creates a new object for each test by default,
2. You can disable it using PREFABRICATION=0
This change both speeds up specs (less strings to allocate) and helps catch
cases where methods in Discourse are mutating inputs.
Overall we will be migrating everything to use #frozen_string_literal: true
it will take a while, but this is the first and safest move in this direction
Includes support for flags, reviewable users and queued posts, with REST API
backwards compatibility.
Co-Authored-By: romanrizzi <romanalejandro@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: jjaffeux <j.jaffeux@gmail.com>
Since rspec-rails 3, the default installation creates two helper files:
* `spec_helper.rb`
* `rails_helper.rb`
`spec_helper.rb` is intended as a way of running specs that do not
require Rails, whereas `rails_helper.rb` loads Rails (as Discourse's
current `spec_helper.rb` does).
For more information:
https://www.relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-rails/docs/upgrade#default-helper-files
In this commit, I've simply replaced all instances of `spec_helper` with
`rails_helper`, and renamed the original `spec_helper.rb`.
This brings the Discourse project closer to the standard usage of RSpec
in a Rails app.
At present, every spec relies on loading Rails, but there are likely
many that don't need to. In a future pull request, I hope to introduce a
separate, minimal `spec_helper.rb` which can be used in tests which
don't rely on Rails.
jbrw
Roman Rizzi
Robin Ward
Blake Erickson
David Taylor
Leo McArdle
Dan Ungureanu
Daniel Waterworth
Sam Saffron
Régis Hanol
Vinoth Kannan
Kyle Zhao
jose-hms
Guo Xiang Tan
Neil Lalonde
pmusaraj
Andy Waite