Releasing the decrypted input buffer so that it can be re-acquired
with an expanded capacity.
Looping around only if the buffer size has changed.
Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
* Issue #4203 - Updating test to verify report on Transfer-Encoding
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
* Fixes#4203 - Transfer-Encoding + Content-Length is 400 Bad Request
+ Fixing validation to not be header order dependent.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
* Issue #4203 - Fixing hasTransferEncoding reset and testcase assumption
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
* Issue #4204 - Transfer-Encoding RFC7230 behaviors
+ More test cases and implementation.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
* Issue #4204 - Transfer-Encoding RFC7230 behaviors
+ Adjusting HttpParser to handle the case where we have multiple
Transfer-Encoding headers and none declare the 'chunked' token.
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
* Issue #4204 - Transfer-Encoding RFC7230 behaviors
+ Making changes from PR review
Signed-off-by: Joakim Erdfelt <joakim.erdfelt@gmail.com>
* Issue #4203 Transfer Encoding
request with TE and no chunking is a Bad Request
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
* issue exclude/include con name InetAccesHandler - add better unit test
this logic:
String name =
baseRequest.getHttpChannel().getConnector().getName();
return _names.test(name) && _addrs.test(addr);
Is not correct. it's treating the connector name exactly like the
filter. But that's not what it's intended to do. It's supposed to tell
what connectors are applicable to this filter. And what connectors are
not affected.
For example in the unit test there exists 2 connectors:
http
tls
We want to restrict the http connector, but we want to leave tls
connector alone.
So we would specify:
include = 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254
includeConnector = http
The way the logic is above, it is treating the connector name as if it's
the filter itself. Which is not what I intended.
What i need in psuedo-code is this:
if (there are no "include connectors" OR if this connector is
included) AND (if this connector is not in the excluded list)
---> Then apply the IP filter.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas DiPiazza <nicholas.dipiazza@lucidworks.com>
* exclude should take precedence over include
Signed-off-by: Nicholas DiPiazza <nicholas.dipiazza@lucidworks.com>
* Issue #4193 InetAccessHandler
reverted changes to IncludeExcludeSet
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
* Issue #4193 InetAccessHandler
updates from review
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
* Issue #4208 Content-Length in 304
Added tests for RFC7230 section 3.3.2 for 304 and HEAD responses with content length.
Fixed HttpGenerator to set content-length in 304 response
Fixed insufficient content written check for 304
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
* Issue #4208 Content-Length in 304
Use contentLengthField
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Added workarounds for the Java 11 behavior.
In fill(), call closeInbound() if we filled -1 and the handshake
did not start yet. This avoids to send a ClientHello to the peer
even if we are closing.
In flush(), if the handshake status is NEED_UNWRAP but we are
closing, force a wrap().
Added test cases.
Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
* Issue #4188 Spin in close of GzipHandler
Cleanup and simplify code
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
* Issue #4188 Spin in close of GzipHandler
Fix slice code. Added unit test for it.
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
* Issue #4188 Spin in close of GzipHandler
Fixed last slice.
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
* cleanup from review
Signed-off-by: Greg Wilkins <gregw@webtide.com>
Now rethrowing other exceptions as SSLHandshakeException
if they happen during the TLS handshake.
Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <simone.bordet@gmail.com>
olivier lamy
Simone Bordet
Greg Wilkins
Joakim Erdfelt
Lachlan Roberts
Chris Walker
Jan Bartel