2013-08-28 19:24:34 -04:00
|
|
|
[[modules-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
=== Node
|
2013-08-28 19:24:34 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-24 21:59:43 -04:00
|
|
|
Any time that you start an instance of Elasticsearch, you are starting a _node_.
|
|
|
|
A collection of connected nodes is called a <<modules-cluster,cluster>>. If you
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
are running a single node of {es}, then you have a cluster of one node.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every node in the cluster can handle <<modules-http,HTTP>> and
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
<<modules-transport,Transport>> traffic by default. The transport layer is used
|
|
|
|
exclusively for communication between nodes; the HTTP layer is used by REST
|
|
|
|
clients.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All nodes know about all the other nodes in the cluster and can forward client
|
2020-03-24 21:59:43 -04:00
|
|
|
requests to the appropriate node.
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By default, a node is all of the following types: master-eligible, data, ingest,
|
2020-04-07 11:35:08 -04:00
|
|
|
and (if available) machine learning and transform.
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-07 11:35:08 -04:00
|
|
|
TIP: As the cluster grows and in particular if you have large {ml} jobs or
|
|
|
|
{ctransforms}, consider separating dedicated master-eligible nodes from
|
|
|
|
dedicated data nodes, {ml} nodes, and {transform} nodes.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<<master-node,Master-eligible node>>::
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
A node that has the `master` role (default), which makes it eligible to be
|
|
|
|
<<modules-discovery,elected as the _master_ node>>, which controls the cluster.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<<data-node,Data node>>::
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
A node that has the `data` role (default). Data nodes hold data and perform data
|
|
|
|
related operations such as CRUD, search, and aggregations.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-04 13:45:49 -05:00
|
|
|
<<ingest,Ingest node>>::
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
A node that has the `ingest` role (default). Ingest nodes are able to apply an
|
|
|
|
<<pipeline,ingest pipeline>> to a document in order to transform and enrich the
|
|
|
|
document before indexing. With a heavy ingest load, it makes sense to use
|
|
|
|
dedicated ingest nodes and to not include the `ingest` role from nodes that have
|
|
|
|
the `master` or `data` roles.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
<<ml-node,Machine learning node>>::
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
A node that has `xpack.ml.enabled` and the `ml` role, which is the default
|
|
|
|
behavior in the {es} {default-dist}. If you want to use {ml-features}, there
|
|
|
|
must be at least one {ml} node in your cluster. For more information about
|
|
|
|
{ml-features}, see {ml-docs}/index.html[Machine learning in the {stack}].
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
+
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: If you use the {oss-dist}, do not add the `ml` role. Otherwise, the
|
|
|
|
node fails to start.
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-18 18:23:41 -04:00
|
|
|
<<transform-node,{transform-cap} node>>::
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
A node that has the `transform` role. If you want to use {transforms}, there
|
|
|
|
be at least one {transform} node in your cluster. For more information, see
|
|
|
|
<<transform-settings>> and <<transforms>>.
|
2020-03-18 18:23:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
[NOTE]
|
|
|
|
[[coordinating-node]]
|
|
|
|
.Coordinating node
|
|
|
|
===============================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requests like search requests or bulk-indexing requests may involve data held
|
|
|
|
on different data nodes. A search request, for example, is executed in two
|
|
|
|
phases which are coordinated by the node which receives the client request --
|
|
|
|
the _coordinating node_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the _scatter_ phase, the coordinating node forwards the request to the data
|
|
|
|
nodes which hold the data. Each data node executes the request locally and
|
|
|
|
returns its results to the coordinating node. In the _gather_ phase, the
|
|
|
|
coordinating node reduces each data node's results into a single global
|
|
|
|
resultset.
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-04 13:45:49 -05:00
|
|
|
Every node is implicitly a coordinating node. This means that a node that has
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
an explicit empty list of roles via `node.roles` will only act as a coordinating
|
|
|
|
node, which cannot be disabled. As a result, such a node needs to have enough
|
|
|
|
memory and CPU in order to deal with the gather phase.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
===============================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[master-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
==== Master-eligible node
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The master node is responsible for lightweight cluster-wide actions such as
|
|
|
|
creating or deleting an index, tracking which nodes are part of the cluster,
|
|
|
|
and deciding which shards to allocate to which nodes. It is important for
|
|
|
|
cluster health to have a stable master node.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-25 11:29:30 -04:00
|
|
|
Any master-eligible node that is not a <<voting-only-node,voting-only node>> may
|
|
|
|
be elected to become the master node by the <<modules-discovery,master election
|
|
|
|
process>>.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2017-06-13 17:03:42 -04:00
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: Master nodes must have access to the `data/` directory (just like
|
2020-03-24 21:59:43 -04:00
|
|
|
`data` nodes) as this is where the cluster state is persisted between node
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
restarts.
|
2016-07-17 15:10:33 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
[[dedicated-master-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
===== Dedicated master-eligible node
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-03-24 21:59:43 -04:00
|
|
|
It is important for the health of the cluster that the elected master node has
|
|
|
|
the resources it needs to fulfill its responsibilities. If the elected master
|
|
|
|
node is overloaded with other tasks then the cluster may not operate well. In
|
|
|
|
particular, indexing and searching your data can be very resource-intensive, so
|
|
|
|
in large or high-throughput clusters it is a good idea to avoid using the
|
|
|
|
master-eligible nodes for tasks such as indexing and searching. You can do this
|
|
|
|
by configuring three of your nodes to be dedicated master-eligible nodes.
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
Dedicated master-eligible nodes only have the `master` role, allowing them to
|
2020-03-24 21:59:43 -04:00
|
|
|
focus on managing the cluster. While master nodes can also behave as
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
<<coordinating-node,coordinating nodes>> and route search and indexing requests
|
|
|
|
from clients to data nodes, it is better _not_ to use dedicated master nodes for
|
|
|
|
this purpose.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
To create a dedicated master-eligible node, set:
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
node.roles: [ master ]
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2019-06-25 11:29:30 -04:00
|
|
|
[[voting-only-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
===== Voting-only master-eligible node
|
2019-06-25 11:29:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A voting-only master-eligible node is a node that participates in
|
|
|
|
<<modules-discovery,master elections>> but which will not act as the cluster's
|
|
|
|
elected master node. In particular, a voting-only node can serve as a tiebreaker
|
|
|
|
in elections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It may seem confusing to use the term "master-eligible" to describe a
|
|
|
|
voting-only node since such a node is not actually eligible to become the master
|
|
|
|
at all. This terminology is an unfortunate consequence of history:
|
|
|
|
master-eligible nodes are those nodes that participate in elections and perform
|
|
|
|
certain tasks during cluster state publications, and voting-only nodes have the
|
|
|
|
same responsibilities even if they can never become the elected master.
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
To configure a master-eligible node as a voting-only node, include `master` and
|
|
|
|
`voting_only` in the list of roles. For example to create a voting-only data
|
|
|
|
node:
|
2019-06-25 11:29:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
node.roles: [ data, master, voting_only ]
|
2019-06-25 11:29:30 -04:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
IMPORTANT: The `voting_only` role requires the {default-dist} of {es} and is not
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
supported in the {oss-dist}. If you use the {oss-dist} and add the `voting_only`
|
|
|
|
role then the node will fail to start. Also note that only nodes with the
|
|
|
|
`master` role can be marked as having the `voting_only` role.
|
2019-06-25 11:29:30 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High availability (HA) clusters require at least three master-eligible nodes, at
|
|
|
|
least two of which are not voting-only nodes. Such a cluster will be able to
|
|
|
|
elect a master node even if one of the nodes fails.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since voting-only nodes never act as the cluster's elected master, they may
|
|
|
|
require require less heap and a less powerful CPU than the true master nodes.
|
|
|
|
However all master-eligible nodes, including voting-only nodes, require
|
|
|
|
reasonably fast persistent storage and a reliable and low-latency network
|
|
|
|
connection to the rest of the cluster, since they are on the critical path for
|
|
|
|
<<cluster-state-publishing,publishing cluster state updates>>.
|
|
|
|
|
2019-07-02 12:48:29 -04:00
|
|
|
Voting-only master-eligible nodes may also fill other roles in your cluster.
|
|
|
|
For instance, a node may be both a data node and a voting-only master-eligible
|
|
|
|
node. A _dedicated_ voting-only master-eligible nodes is a voting-only
|
|
|
|
master-eligible node that fills no other roles in the cluster. To create a
|
|
|
|
dedicated voting-only master-eligible node in the {default-dist}, set:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
node.roles: [ master, voting_only ]
|
2019-07-02 12:48:29 -04:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
[[data-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
==== Data node
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data nodes hold the shards that contain the documents you have indexed. Data
|
|
|
|
nodes handle data related operations like CRUD, search, and aggregations.
|
|
|
|
These operations are I/O-, memory-, and CPU-intensive. It is important to
|
|
|
|
monitor these resources and to add more data nodes if they are overloaded.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
The main benefit of having dedicated data nodes is the separation of the master
|
|
|
|
and data roles.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
To create a dedicated data node, set:
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
node.roles: [ data ]
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2016-03-04 13:45:49 -05:00
|
|
|
[[node-ingest-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
==== Ingest node
|
2016-03-04 13:45:49 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ingest nodes can execute pre-processing pipelines, composed of one or more
|
|
|
|
ingest processors. Depending on the type of operations performed by the ingest
|
|
|
|
processors and the required resources, it may make sense to have dedicated
|
|
|
|
ingest nodes, that will only perform this specific task.
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
To create a dedicated ingest node, set:
|
2016-03-04 13:45:49 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
node.roles: [ ingest ]
|
2016-03-04 13:45:49 -05:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[coordinating-only-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
==== Coordinating only node
|
2016-03-04 13:45:49 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you take away the ability to be able to handle master duties, to hold data,
|
|
|
|
and pre-process documents, then you are left with a _coordinating_ node that
|
|
|
|
can only route requests, handle the search reduce phase, and distribute bulk
|
|
|
|
indexing. Essentially, coordinating only nodes behave as smart load balancers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coordinating only nodes can benefit large clusters by offloading the
|
|
|
|
coordinating node role from data and master-eligible nodes. They join the
|
|
|
|
cluster and receive the full <<cluster-state,cluster state>>, like every other
|
|
|
|
node, and they use the cluster state to route requests directly to the
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
appropriate place(s).
|
|
|
|
|
2016-03-04 13:45:49 -05:00
|
|
|
WARNING: Adding too many coordinating only nodes to a cluster can increase the
|
|
|
|
burden on the entire cluster because the elected master node must await
|
|
|
|
acknowledgement of cluster state updates from every node! The benefit of
|
|
|
|
coordinating only nodes should not be overstated -- data nodes can happily
|
|
|
|
serve the same purpose.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
To create a dedicated coordinating node, set:
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
node.roles: [ ]
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
[[ml-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
==== [xpack]#Machine learning node#
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The {ml-features} provide {ml} nodes, which run jobs and handle {ml} API
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
requests. If `xpack.ml.enabled` is set to `true` and the node does not have the
|
|
|
|
`ml` role, the node can service API requests but it cannot run jobs.
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you want to use {ml-features} in your cluster, you must enable {ml}
|
2020-04-02 18:34:37 -04:00
|
|
|
(set `xpack.ml.enabled` to `true`) on all master-eligible nodes. If you want to
|
|
|
|
use {ml-features} in clients (including {kib}), it must also be enabled on all
|
|
|
|
coordinating nodes. If you have the {oss-dist}, do not use these settings.
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For more information about these settings, see <<ml-settings>>.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To create a dedicated {ml} node in the {default-dist}, set:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
node.roles: [ ml ]
|
|
|
|
xpack.ml.enabled: true <1>
|
2019-06-13 12:46:55 -04:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
<1> The `xpack.ml.enabled` setting is enabled by default.
|
2020-03-18 18:23:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[transform-node]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
==== [xpack]#{transform-cap} node#
|
2020-03-18 18:23:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{transform-cap} nodes run {transforms} and handle {transform} API requests.
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
If you want to use {transforms} in clients (including {kib}), it must also be
|
|
|
|
enabled on all coordinating nodes. You must also have at least one node with the
|
|
|
|
`transform` role. This is the default behavior. If you have the {oss-dist}, do
|
|
|
|
not use these settings. For more information, see <<transform-settings>>.
|
2020-03-18 18:23:41 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To create a dedicated {transform} node in the {default-dist}, set:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
node.roles: [ transform ]
|
2020-03-18 18:23:41 -04:00
|
|
|
-------------------
|
2017-06-13 17:03:42 -04:00
|
|
|
|
2019-04-09 09:02:03 -04:00
|
|
|
[[change-node-role]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
==== Changing the role of a node
|
2019-04-09 09:02:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each data node maintains the following data on disk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the shard data for every shard allocated to that node,
|
|
|
|
* the index metadata corresponding with every shard allocated to that node, and
|
|
|
|
* the cluster-wide metadata, such as settings and index templates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similarly, each master-eligible node maintains the following data on disk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* the index metadata for every index in the cluster, and
|
|
|
|
* the cluster-wide metadata, such as settings and index templates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each node checks the contents of its data path at startup. If it discovers
|
|
|
|
unexpected data then it will refuse to start. This is to avoid importing
|
|
|
|
unwanted <<modules-gateway-dangling-indices,dangling indices>> which can lead
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
to a red cluster health. To be more precise, nodes without the `data` role will
|
2019-04-09 09:02:03 -04:00
|
|
|
refuse to start if they find any shard data on disk at startup, and nodes with
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
without both the `master` and `data` roles will refuse to start if they have any index metadata on disk at startup.
|
2019-04-09 09:02:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is possible to change the roles of a node by adjusting its
|
|
|
|
`elasticsearch.yml` file and restarting it. This is known as _repurposing_ a
|
|
|
|
node. In order to satisfy the checks for unexpected data described above, you
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
must perform some extra steps to prepare a node for repurposing when starting
|
|
|
|
the node without the `data` or `master` roles.
|
2019-04-09 09:02:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
* If you want to repurpose a data node by removing the `data` role then you
|
|
|
|
should first use an <<allocation-filtering,allocation filter>> to safely
|
2019-04-09 09:02:03 -04:00
|
|
|
migrate all the shard data onto other nodes in the cluster.
|
|
|
|
|
Introduce node.roles setting (#58512)
Today we have individual settings for configuring node roles such as
node.data and node.master. Additionally, roles are pluggable and we have
used this to introduce roles such as node.ml and node.voting_only. As
the number of roles is growing, managing these becomes harder for the
user. For example, to create a master-only node, today a user has to
configure:
- node.data: false
- node.ingest: false
- node.remote_cluster_client: false
- node.ml: false
at a minimum if they are relying on defaults, but also add:
- node.master: true
- node.transform: false
- node.voting_only: false
If they want to be explicit. This is also challenging in cases where a
user wants to have configure a coordinating-only node which requires
disabling all roles, a list which we are adding to, requiring the user
to keep checking whether a node has acquired any of these roles.
This commit addresses this by adding a list setting node.roles for which
a user has explicit control over the list of roles that a node has. If
the setting is configured, the node has exactly the roles in the list,
and not any additional roles. This means to configure a master-only
node, the setting is merely 'node.roles: [master]', and to configure a
coordinating-only node, the setting is merely: 'node.roles: []'.
With this change we deprecate the existing 'node.*' settings such as
'node.data'.
2020-06-25 14:14:51 -04:00
|
|
|
* If you want to repurpose a node to have neither the `data` nor `master` roles
|
|
|
|
then it is simplest to start a brand-new node with an empty data path and the
|
|
|
|
desired roles. You may find it safest to use an
|
|
|
|
<<allocation-filtering,allocation filter>> to migrate the shard data elsewhere
|
|
|
|
in the cluster first.
|
2019-04-09 09:02:03 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If it is not possible to follow these extra steps then you may be able to use
|
|
|
|
the <<node-tool-repurpose,`elasticsearch-node repurpose`>> tool to delete any
|
|
|
|
excess data that prevents a node from starting.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
[discrete]
|
|
|
|
=== Node data path settings
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[[data-path]]
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
==== `path.data`
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every data and master-eligible node requires access to a data directory where
|
|
|
|
shards and index and cluster metadata will be stored. The `path.data` defaults
|
|
|
|
to `$ES_HOME/data` but can be configured in the `elasticsearch.yml` config
|
|
|
|
file an absolute path or a path relative to `$ES_HOME` as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,yaml]
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
path.data: /var/elasticsearch/data
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like all node settings, it can also be specified on the command line as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[source,sh]
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
2016-05-19 14:08:08 -04:00
|
|
|
./bin/elasticsearch -Epath.data=/var/elasticsearch/data
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TIP: When using the `.zip` or `.tar.gz` distributions, the `path.data` setting
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
should be configured to locate the data directory outside the {es} home
|
|
|
|
directory, so that the home directory can be deleted without deleting your data!
|
|
|
|
The RPM and Debian distributions do this for you already.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
[discrete]
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
[[max-local-storage-nodes]]
|
|
|
|
=== `node.max_local_storage_nodes`
|
|
|
|
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
The <<data-path,data path>> can be shared by multiple nodes, even by nodes from
|
|
|
|
different clusters. It is recommended however to only run one node of {es} using
|
|
|
|
the same data path. This setting is deprecated in 7.x and will be removed in
|
|
|
|
version 8.0.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
By default, {es} is configured to prevent more than one node from sharing the
|
|
|
|
same data path. To allow for more than one node (e.g., on your development
|
|
|
|
machine), use the setting `node.max_local_storage_nodes` and set this to a
|
|
|
|
positive integer larger than one.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-31 06:51:46 -05:00
|
|
|
WARNING: Never run different node types (i.e. master, data) from the same data
|
|
|
|
directory. This can lead to unexpected data loss.
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
[discrete]
|
|
|
|
[[other-node-settings]]
|
|
|
|
=== Other node settings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More node settings can be found in <<settings>> and <<important-settings>>,
|
|
|
|
including:
|
2016-01-13 10:00:24 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2020-06-01 12:04:15 -04:00
|
|
|
* <<cluster.name,`cluster.name`>>
|
|
|
|
* <<node.name,`node.name`>>
|
|
|
|
* <<modules-network,network settings>>
|