This commit adds support for histogram and date_histogram agg compound order by refactoring and reusing terms agg order code. The major change is that the Terms.Order and Histogram.Order classes have been replaced/refactored into a new class BucketOrder. This is a breaking change for the Java Transport API. For backward compatibility with previous ES versions the (date)histogram compound order will use the first order. Also the _term and _time aggregation order keys have been deprecated; replaced by _key.
Relates to #20003: now that all these aggregations use the same order code, it should be easier to move validation to parse time (as a follow up PR).
Relates to #14771: histogram and date_histogram aggregation order will now be validated at reduce time.
Closes#23613: if a single BucketOrder that is not a tie-breaker is added with the Java Transport API, it will be converted into a CompoundOrder with a tie-breaker.
We've had `QueryDSLDocumentationTests` for a while but it had a very
hopeful comment at the top about how we want to make sure that the
example in the query-dsl docs match up with the test but we never
had anything that made *sure* that they did. This changes that!
Now the examples from the query-dsl docs are all built from the
`QueryDSLDocumentationTests`. All except for the percolator example
because that is hard to do as it stands now.
To make this easier this change moves `QueryDSLDocumentationTests`
from core and into the high level rest client. This is useful for
two reasons:
1. We expect the high level rest client to be able to use the builders.
2. The code that builds that docs doesn't check out all of
Elasticsearch. It only checks out certain directories. Since we're
already including snippets from that directory we don't have to
make any changes to that process.
Closes#24320
This commit upgrades the Log4j dependencies from version 2.7 to version
2.8.2. This release includes a fix for a case where Log4j could lose
exceptions in the presence of a security manager.
Relates #23995
The reindex API is mature now, and we will work to maintain backwards
compatibility in accordance with our backwards compatibility
policy. This commit unmarks the reindex API as experimental.
Relates #23621
When using a bulk processor in test, you might write something like:
```java
BulkProcessor bulkProcessor = BulkProcessor.builder(client, new BulkProcessor.Listener() {
@Override public void beforeBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request) {}
@Override public void afterBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request, BulkResponse response) {}
@Override public void afterBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request, Throwable failure) {}
})
.setBulkActions(10000)
.setFlushInterval(TimeValue.timeValueSeconds(10))
.build();
for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
bulkProcessor.add(new IndexRequest("foo", "bar", "doc_" + i)
.source(jsonBuilder().startObject().field("foo", "bar").endObject()
));
}
bulkProcessor.flush();
client.admin().indices().prepareRefresh("foo").get();
SearchResponse response = client.prepareSearch("foo").get();
// response does not contain any hit
```
The problem is that by default bulkProcessor defines the number of concurrent requests to 1 which is using behind the scene an Async BulkRequestHandler.
When you call `flush()` in a test, you expect it to flush all the content of the bulk so you can search for your docs.
But because of the async handling, there is a great chance that none of the documents has been indexed yet when you call the `refresh` method.
We should advice in our Java guide to explicitly set concurrent requests to `0` so users will use behind the scene the Sync BulkRequestHandler.
```java
BulkProcessor bulkProcessor = BulkProcessor.builder(client, new BulkProcessor.Listener() {
@Override public void beforeBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request) {}
@Override public void afterBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request, BulkResponse response) {}
@Override public void afterBulk(long executionId, BulkRequest request, Throwable failure) {}
})
.setBulkActions(5000)
.setFlushInterval(TimeValue.timeValueSeconds(10))
.setConcurrentRequests(0)
.build();
```
Closes#22158.
When we decided to deprecate and remove fuzzy query in #15760, we didn't realize we would take away the possibililty for uses to use a fuzzy query as part of a span query, which is not possible using match query. This means we have to go back and un-deprecate fuzzy query, which will not be removed.
Closes#15760
These query names were all deprecated in 5.0.0:
- in is removed in favour of terms
- geo_bbox is removed in favour of geo_bounding_box
- mlt is removed in favour of more_like_this
- fuzzy_match and match_fuzzy are removed in favour of match
* Scripting: Remove groovy scripting language
Groovy was deprecated in 5.0. This change removes it, along with the
legacy default language infrastructure in scripting.
By default, it is recommended to start bulk with a size of 10-15MB, and increase it gradually to get the right size for the environment. The example shows originally 1GB, which can lead to some users to just copy-paste the code snippet and start with excessively big sizes.
Backport of #21664 in master branch.
With ES 5.0 we do not include Jackson
Databind anymore with ES core. This commit
updates our docs to state that users need
to add this artifact now in their projects.
The `client/transport` project adds a new jar build project that
pulls in all dependencies and configures all required modules.
Preinstalled modules are:
* transport-netty
* lang-mustache
* reindex
* percolator
The `TransportClient` classes are still in core
while `TransportClient.Builder` has only a protected construcutor
such that users are redirected to use the new `TransportClientBuilder`
from the new jar.
Closes#19412
* Removed `Template` class and unified script & template parsing logic. Templates are scripts, so they should be defined as a script. Unless there will be separate template infrastructure, templates should share as much code as possible with scripts.
* Removed ScriptParseException in favour for ElasticsearchParseException
* Moved TemplateQueryBuilder to lang-mustache module because this query is hard coded to work with mustache only
In 995e4eda08be99f72ef56052b3f78ceef9100885 we changed the cluster health Java API.
We need to also change the documentation.
Backport of #19093 in master branch