* addSnapshotLifecyclePolicy drop version assertion
This drops the assertion on the policy version (which was pinned to 1L)
as we want to execute both put policy apis (sync and async) for
documentation purposes. This will sometimes (depending on the async
call) yield a version of 2L. Waiting for the async call to always
complete could be an option but the test is already rather slow and it's
a bit of an overkill as we're already verifying the policy was created.
(cherry picked from commit af4864c39129bcdbf98d00223f445346a62075e4)
Signed-off-by: Andrei Dan <andrei.dan@elastic.co>
We were repeatedly trying to send shard state updates for aborted
snapshots on every cluster state update.
This is simply dead-code since those updates are already safely
sent in the callbacks passed to `SnapshotShardsService#snapshot`.
On master failover, we ensure that the status update is resent
via `SnapshotShardsService#syncShardStatsOnNewMaster`.
=> there is no need for trying to send updates here over and over
and this logic can safely be removed
This assertion was added during the development of required
pipelines. In the initial version of that work, the notion of whether or
not a request was forwarded from the coordinating node to an ingest node
was introduced. It was realized later that instead we needed to track
whether or not the pipeline for the request was resolved. When that
change was made, this assertion, while not incorrect, was left behind
and only applied if the coordnating node was forwarding the
request. Instead, the assertion applies whether or not the request is
being forwarded. This commit addresses that by moving the assertion and
renaming some variables.
GoogleCloudStorageBlobStore.deleteBlobsIgnoringIfNotExists() does
not correctly catch StorageException thrown by batch.submit().
In the case a snapshot is deleted through BlobStoreRepository.deleteSnapshot()
a storage exception is not caught (only IOException are) so the deletion is
interrupted and indices cannot be cleaned up. The storage exception bubbles
up to SnapshotService.deleteSnapshotFromRepository() but the listener that
removes the deletion from the cluster state is not executed, leaving the
deletion in the cluster state.
This bug has been reported in #46772 where batch.submit() threw an
exception in the test testIndicesDeletedFromRepository and following
tests failed because a snapshot deletion was running.
Relates #46772
This commit adds the ability to require an ingest pipeline on an
index. Today we can have a default pipeline, but that could be
overridden by a request pipeline parameter. This commit introduces a new
index setting index.required_pipeline that acts similarly to
index.default_pipeline, except that it can not be overridden by a
request pipeline parameter. Additionally, a default pipeline and a
request pipeline can not both be set. The required pipeline can be set
to _none to ensure that no pipeline ever runs for index requests on that
index.
This test is broken with a very low failure rate after recent changes.
Particularly after #45689 which does not check for duplicate snapshot
uuids during snapshot finalization any more.
The check for duplicate uuids during finalization was removed
conciously since it lead to problems during master failover.
This test fails because it increments the repository state id in an
unexpected manner now, starting from the impossible situation of having
the same snapshot UUID for two different repository state ids.
This situation can't normally be reached, but we manually crafted it here.
This test didn't do anything before though, because the manually crafted
cluster state would simply result in an error during finalization before
and nothing but a normal snapshot delete would be tested.
=> removing this test here, it doesn't test anything.
Closes#46843
When using auto-generated IDs + the ingest drop processor (which looks to be used by filebeat
as well) + coordinating nodes that do not have the ingest processor functionality, this can lead
to a NullPointerException.
The issue is that markCurrentItemAsDropped() is creating an UpdateResponse with no id when
the request contains auto-generated IDs. The response serialization is lenient for our
REST/XContent format (i.e. we will send "id" : null) but the internal transport format (used for
communication between nodes) assumes for this field to be non-null, which means that it can't
be serialized between nodes. Bulk requests with ingest functionality are processed on the
coordinating node if the node has the ingest capability, and only otherwise sent to a different
node. This means that, in order to reproduce this, one needs two nodes, with the coordinating
node not having the ingest functionality.
Closes#46678
We should only snapshot the index we're going to
restore in the next step. Otherwise, we will
potentially not get the correct response or
fail restoring outright due to internal indices
getting created concurrently when running against
the x-pack distribution.
Closes#46844
Follow up from #42346. Since the `methods` array is in order of
preference when calling the index API with an `{id}` we prefer to use
the `PUT` http method.
The fact that this test randomly uses a relatively large number
of nodes and hence Netty worker threads created a problem with
running out of direct memory on CI.
Tests run with 512M heap (and hence 512M direct memory) by default.
On a CI worker with 16 cores, this means Netty will by default set
up 32 transport workers. If we get unlucky and a lot of them
actually do work (and thus instantiate a `CopyBytesSocketChannel`
which costs 1M per thread for the thread-local IO buffer) we
would run out of memory.
This specific failure was only seen with `NativeRealmIntegTests` so I
only added the constraint on the Netty worker count here.
We can add it to other tests (or `SecurityIntegTestCase`) if need be
but for now it doesn't seem necessary so I opted for least impact.
Closes#46803
In #46250 we will have to move to two different delete
paths for BwC. Both paths will share the initial
reads from the repository though so I extracted/separated the
delete logic away from the initial reads to significantly simplify
the diff against #46250 here.
Also, I added some JavaDoc from #46250 here as well which makes the
code a little easier to follow even ignoring #46250 I think.
* [DOCS] Adds regression analytics resources and examples to the data frame analytics APIs.
Co-Authored-By: Benjamin Trent <ben.w.trent@gmail.com>
Co-Authored-By: Tom Veasey <tveasey@users.noreply.github.com>
This commit disables caching of BWC snapshot distributions in the "trunk" (aka master) branch.
Since the previous major release branches move quickly we rarely get cache hits for these
tasks, and the artifacts themselves are very large. This means the overhead here is high and
savings basically zero. We conditionally disable task output caching in this scenario in CI to
avoid excessive build cache overhead as well as causing too much turn in the cache itself which
would lead to lots of cache entry evictions.
This commit reuses the same state processor that is used for autodetect
to parse state output from data frame analytics jobs. We then index the
state document into the state index.
Backport of #46804
* [ML][Transforms] remove `force` flag from _start (#46414)
* [ML][Transforms] remove `force` flag from _start
* fixing expected error message
* adjusting bwc version
Prior to this commit terminate_after was sent as request body parameter
(via SearchSourceBuilder), which is not possible in the count api.
Closes#46446
It is possible for a running analytics job that its config is removed
from the '.ml-config' index (perhaps the user deleted the entire index,
etc.). In that case the task remains without a matching config. I have
raised #46781 to discuss how to deal with this issue.
This commit focuses on `MlMemoryTracker` and changes it so that when
we get the configs for the running tasks we leniently ignore missing ones.
This at least means memory tracking will keep working for other jobs
if one or more are missing.
In addition, this commit makes the cleanup code for native analytics
tests more robust by explicitly stopping all jobs and force-stopping
if an error occurs. This helps so that a single failing test does
not cause other tests fail due to pending tasks.
Backport of #46789
Suppress the reasonable-history check in this test to guarantee we're always getting ops based recovery even after a background sync.
Closes#45953
Co-Authored-By: David Turner <david.turner@elastic.co>
Javier Ruiz
Lisa Cawley
James Rodewig
Alpar Torok
Andrei Dan
Armin Braun
Hendrik Muhs
Jason Tedor
István Zoltán Szabó
Martijn van Groningen
Tanguy Leroux
Colin Goodheart-Smithe
Julie Tibshirani
rikardbakkehaug
Yannick Welsch
Takumasa Ochi
Russ Cam
Martijn Laarman
LHearen
maidoo
Toby McLaughlin
Luca Cavanna
Mark Vieira
Dimitris Athanasiou
Benjamin Trent
Turaç Kangal
Christos Soulios