The message `... took [31s] above the warn threshold of 30s` suggests
incorrectly that the task took 61 seconds. This commit adds the clarifying
words `which is`.
At times, we need to check for usage of deprecated settings in settings
which should not be returned by the NodeInfo API. This commit changes
the deprecation info API to run all node checks locally so that these
settings can be checked without exposing them via any externally
accessible API.
This commit introduces a background sync for retention leases. The idea
here is that we do a heavyweight sync when adding a new retention lease,
and then periodically we want to background sync any retention lease
renewals to the replicas. As long as the background sync interval is
significantly lower than the extended lifetime of a retention lease, it
is okay if from time to time a replica misses a sync (it will still have
an older version of the lease that is retaining more data as we assume
that renewals do not decrease the retaining sequence number). There are
two follow-ups that will come after this commit. The first is to address
the fact that we have not adapted the should periodically flush logic to
possibly flush the retention leases. We want to do something like flush
if we have not flushed in the last five minutes and there are renewed
retention leases since the last time that we flushed. An additional
follow-up will remove the syncing of retention leases when a retention
lease expires. Today this sync could be invoked in the background by a
merge operation. Rather, we will move the syncing of retention lease
expiration to be done under the background sync. The background sync
will use the heavyweight sync (write action) if a lease has expired, and
will use the lightweight background sync (replication action) otherwise.
The explanation so far can be invaluable for troubleshooting
as incorrect decisions made early on in the structure analysis
can result in seemingly crazy decisions or timeouts later on.
Relates elastic/kibana#29821
Reduces the leader and follower check timeout to 3 * 10 = 30s instead of 3 * 30 = 90s, with 30s still
being a very long time for a node to be completely unresponsive.
With this commit we add a monotonically strict timer to ensure time is
advancing even if the timer is called in a tight loop in tests. We also
relax a condition in a similar test so it only checks that time is not
moving backwards.
Closes#33747
This adds a dedicated field mapper that supports nanosecond resolution -
at the price of a reduced date range.
When using the date field mapper, the time is stored as milliseconds since the epoch
in a long in lucene. This field mapper stores the time in nanoseconds
since the epoch - which means its range is much smaller, ranging roughly from
1970 to 2262.
Note that aggregations will still be in milliseconds.
However docvalue fields will have full nanosecond resolution
Relates #27330
Today the following settings in the `discovery.zen` namespace are still used:
- `discovery.zen.no_master_block`
- `discovery.zen.hosts_provider`
- `discovery.zen.ping.unicast.concurrent_connects`
- `discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts.resolve_timeout`
- `discovery.zen.ping.unicast.hosts`
This commit deprecates all other settings in this namespace so that they can be
removed in the next major version.
* This was a merge mistake on my end I think, obviously we only need to loop over the shards once not twice here to find those that we missed in INIT state
It would be beneficial to apply some of the request interceptors even
when features are disabled. This change reworks the way we build that
list so that the interceptors we always want to use are constructed
outside of the settings check.
Instead of throwing an exception, use an unresolved attribute to pass
the message to the Verifier.
Additionally improve the parser to save the extended source for the
Aggregate and OrderBy.
Close#38208
The culprit in #38097 is an `IndicesRequest` that has no indices,
but instead of `request.indices()` returning `null` or `String[0]`
it returned `String[] {null}` . This tripped the audit filter.
I have addressed this in two ways:
1. `request.indices()` returning `String[] {null}` is treated as `null`
or `String[0]`, i.e. no indices
2. `null` values among the roles and indices lists, which are
unexpected, will never again stumble the audit filter; `null` values
are treated as special values that will not match any policy,
i.e. their events will always be printed.
Closes#38097
* Fix Incorrect Transport Response Handler Type
* The response type here is not empty and was always wrong but this only became visible now that 0a604e3b24 was introduced
* As a result of 0a604e3b24 we started actually handling the response
of this request and logging/handling exceptions before that we simply dropped the classcast exception here quietly using the empty response handler
* fix busy assert not handling `Exception`
* Closes#38226
* Closes#38256
* Add checks for Grouping functions restriction to be placed inside GROUP BY
* Fixed bug where GROUP BY HISTOGRAM (not using alias) wasn't recognized
properly in the Verifier due to functions equality not working correctly.
We now throw a WarningFailureException instead of ResponseException if
there's any warning in a response. This change leads to the failures of
testSnapshotRestore in the BWC builds for the last two days.
Relates #37247
Today we have DiscoveryDisruptionIT tests for checking that discovery can still
work once the cluster has formed, even if the cluster is misconfigured and only
has a single master-eligible node in its unicast hosts list. In fact with Zen2
we can go one better: we do not need any nodes in the unicast hosts list,
because nodes also use the contents of the last-committed cluster state for
discovery. Additionally, the DiscoveryDisruptionIT tests were failing due to
the overenthusiastic fault-detection timeouts.
This commit replaces these tests with deterministic `CoordinatorTests` that
verify the same behaviour. It also removes some duplication by extracting a
test method called `testFollowerCheckerAfterMasterReelection()`
Closes#37687
We should increase primary term before renewing leases; otherwise, the
term of the latest RetentionLeases will be lower than the current term.
Relates #37951
If the innerLength is 0, the version won't be increased; then there will
be two RetentionLeases with the same term and version, but their leases
are different.
Relates #37951Closes#38245
Adds a Step to the Shrink and Delete actions which prevents those
actions from running on a leader index - all follower indices must first
unfollow the leader index before these actions can run. This prevents
the loss of history before follower indices are ready, which might
otherwise result in the loss of data.
Introduce client-side sorting of groups based on aggregate
functions. To allow this, the Analyzer has been extended to push down
to underlying Aggregate, aggregate function and the Querier has been
extended to identify the case and consume the results in order and sort
them based on the given columns.
The underlying QueryContainer has been slightly modified to allow a view
of the underlying values being extracted as the columns used for sorting
might not be requested by the user.
The PR also adds minor tweaks, mainly related to tree output.
Close#35118
This test has been awaiting a fix that isn't currently relevant because incoming
lambda parameters are read-only. If this ever changes a new set of tests can
be added that are up-to-date.
Because concurrent sync requests from a primary to its replicas could be
in flight, it can be the case that an older retention leases collection
arrives and is processed on the replica after a newer retention leases
collection has arrived and been processed. Without a defense, in this
case the replica would overwrite the newer retention leases with the
older retention leases. This commit addresses this issue by introducing
a versioning scheme to retention leases. This versioning scheme is used
to resolve out-of-order processing on the replica. We persist this
version into Lucene and restore it on recovery. The encoding of
retention leases is starting to get a little ugly. We can consider
addressing this in a follow-up.
There was a bug where creating a new policy would start
the ILM service, even if it was stopped. This change ensures
that there is no change to the existing operation mode
This suite still fails one per week sometimes with a worrying assertion.
Sadly we are still unable to find the actual source.
Expected: <SeqNoStats{maxSeqNo=229, localCheckpoint=86, globalCheckpoint=86}>
but: was <SeqNoStats{maxSeqNo=229, localCheckpoint=-1, globalCheckpoint=86}>
This change enables trace log in the suite so we will have a better
picture if this fails again.
Relates #3333
* Instead of replacing the `shardSnapshots` field, we mutate it, explicitly removing entries from it in only a single spot
* Decreased the amount of indirection by moving all logic for starting a snapshot's newly discovered shard tasks into `startNewShards` (saves us two maps (keyed by snapshot) and iterations over them)
This PR removes the temporary change we made to the yml test harness in #37285
to automatically set `include_type_name` to `true` in index creation requests
if it's not already specified. This is possible now that the vast majority of
index creation requests were updated to be typeless in #37611. A few additional
tests also needed updating here.
Additionally, this PR updates the test harness to set `include_type_name` to
`false` in index creation requests when communicating with 6.x nodes. This
mirrors the logic added in #37611 to allow for typeless document write requests
in test set-up code. With this update in place, we can remove many references
to `include_type_name: false` from the yml tests.