Recently we changed where we source released artifacts for usage in
backwards compatibility tests. We now source these from
artifacts.elastic.co. To avoid polluting the download stats from builds,
we want to add the X-Elastic-No-KPI header to requests from
artifacts.elastic.co. To do this, we hack the Ivy feature of custom HTTP
header credentials and specify our desired headers.
Improve verifier to disallow grouping over grouping functions (e.g.
HISTOGRAM over HISTOGRAM).
Close#38308
(cherry picked from commit 4e9b1cfd4df38c652bba36b4b4b538ce7c714b6e)
Constant numbers (of any form: integers, decimals, negatives,
scientific) and strings shouldn't increase the depth counters
as they don't contribute to the increment of the stack depth.
Fixes: #38571
* ML: update set_upgrade_mode, add logging
* Attempt to fix datafeed isolation
Also renamed a few methods/variables for clarity and added
some comments
This commit enables the copyDockerfile task to render a Dockerfile that
sources the Elasticsearch binary from artifacts.elastic.co. This is
needed for reproducibility and transparency for the official Docker
images in the Docker library.
Now that ML configurations are stored in the .ml-config
index rather than in cluster state there is a possibility
that some users may try to add configurations directly to
the index. Allowing this creates a variety of problems
including possible data exflitration attacks (depending on
how security is set up), so this commit adds warnings
against allowing writes to the .ml-config index other than
via the ML APIs.
Backport of #38509
When we are preparing to release a major version the rules around
"unreleased" versions and branches get a bit more complex.
This change implements the following rules:
- If the tip version on the previous major is a .0 (e.g. 6.7.0) then
the tip of the minor before that (e.g. 6.6.1) must be unreleased.
(This is because 6.7.0 would be "staged" in preparation for release,
but 6.6.1 would be open for bug fixes on the release 6.6.x line)
(in VersionCollection & VersionUtils)
- The "major.x" branch (if it exists) will always point to the latest
minor in that series. Anything that is not the latest minor, must
therefore be on a the "major.minor" branch
For example, if v7.1.0 exists then the "7.x" branch must be 7.1.0,
and 7.0.0 must be on the "7.0" branch
(in VersionCollection)
This commit adds the 7.1 version constant to the 7.x branch.
Co-authored-by: Andy Bristol <andy.bristol@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: Tim Brooks <tim@uncontended.net>
Co-authored-by: Christoph Büscher <cbuescher@posteo.de>
Co-authored-by: Luca Cavanna <javanna@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: markharwood <markharwood@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ioannis Kakavas <ioannis@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: Nhat Nguyen <nhat.nguyen@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: David Roberts <dave.roberts@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: Jason Tedor <jason@tedor.me>
Co-authored-by: Alpar Torok <torokalpar@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: David Turner <david.turner@elastic.co>
Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Tim Vernum <tim@adjective.org>
Co-authored-by: Albert Zaharovits <albert.zaharovits@gmail.com>
- Add resolution to the exact keyword field (if exists) for text fields.
- Add proper verification and error message if underlying keyword
doesn'texist.
- Move check for field attribute in the comparison list to the
`resolveType()` method of `IN`.
Fixes: #38424
This commit changes the `TransportVerifyShardBeforeCloseAction` so that it
always forces the flush of the shard. It seems that #37961 is not sufficient to
ensure that the translog and the Lucene commit share the exact same max
seq no and global checkpoint information in case of one or more noop
operations have been made.
The `BulkWithUpdatesIT.testThatMissingIndexDoesNotAbortFullBulkRequest`
and `FrozenIndexTests.testFreezeEmptyIndexWithTranslogOps` test this trivial
situation and they both fail 1 on 10 executions.
Relates to #33888
In #38333 and #38350 we moved away from the `discovery.zen` settings namespace
since these settings have an effect even though Zen Discovery itself is being
phased out. This change aligns the documentation and the names of related
classes and methods with the newly-introduced naming conventions.
Aliases defined in SELECT (Project or Aggregate) are now resolved in the
following WHERE clause. The Analyzer has been enhanced to identify this
rule and replace the field accordingly.
Close#29983
We have had various reports of problems caused by the maxRetryTimeout
setting in the low-level REST client. Such setting was initially added
in the attempts to not have requests go through retries if the request
already took longer than the provided timeout.
The implementation was problematic though as such timeout would also
expire in the first request attempt (see #31834), would leave the
request executing after expiration causing memory leaks (see #33342),
and would not take into account the http client internal queuing (see #25951).
Given all these issues, it seems that this custom timeout mechanism
gives little benefits while causing a lot of harm. We should rather rely
on connect and socket timeout exposed by the underlying http client
and accept that a request can overall take longer than the configured
timeout, which is the case even with a single retry anyways.
This commit removes the `maxRetryTimeout` setting and all of its usages.
Updated IndexTemplateMetaData to use ObjectParser.
The IndexTemplateMetaData class used old parsing logic and was not
resiliant to new fields. This commit updates it to use the
ConstructingObjectParser and allow unknown fields.
Relates #36938
Co-authored-by: Michael Basnight <mbasnight@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Martijn van Groningen <martijn.v.groningen@gmail.com>
This commit adds an authentication cache for API keys that caches the
hash of an API key with a faster hash. This will enable better
performance when API keys are used for bulk or heavy searching.
I have not been able to reproduce the failing
test scenario locally for #38408 and there are other similar
tests which are running fine in the same test class.
I am re-enabling the test with additional logs so
that we can debug further on what's happening.
I will keep the issue open for now and look out for the builds
to see if there are any related failures.
This commit integrates retention leases with recovery. With this change,
we copy the current retention leases on primary to the replica during
phase two of recovery. At this point, the replica will have been added
to the replication group and so is already receiving retention lease
sync requests from the primary. This means that if any retention lease
syncs are triggered on the primary after we sample the retention leases
here during phase two, that sync request will also arrive on the replica
ensuring that the replica is from this point on up to date with the
retention leases on the primary. We have to copy these during phase two
since we will be applying indexing operations, potentially triggering
merges, and therefore must ensure the correct retention leases are in
place beforehand.
This is related to #35975. We do not want a slow master to fail a
recovery from remote process due to a slow put mappings call. This
commit increases the master node timeout on this call to 30 mins.
`waitForRollUpJob` is an assertBusy that waits for the rollup job
to appear in the tasks list, and waits for it to be a certain state.
However, there was a null check around the state assertion, which meant
if the job _was_ null, the assertion would be skipped, and the
assertBusy would pass withouot an exception. This could then lead to
downstream assertions to fail because the job was not actually ready,
or in the wrong state.
This changes the test to assert the job is not null, so the assertBusy
operates as intended.
Since introduction of data types that don't have a corresponding type
in ES the `esType` is error-prone when used for `unmappedType()` calls.
Moreover since the renaming of `DATE` to `DATETIME` and the introduction
of an actual date-only `DATE` the `esType` would return `datetime` which
is not a valid type for ES mapping.
Fixes: #38051
Instead of logging warnings we now rethrow exceptions thrown inside
scheduled/submitted tasks. This will still log them as warnings in
production but has the added benefit that if they are thrown during
unit/integration test runs, the test will be flagged as an error.
This is a continuation of #38014
Fixed NPE that caused CCR tests (IndexFollowingIT and likely others)
to fail.
schedule could bubble rejected exception to uncaught exception
handler when not using SAME executor if thread pool is terminated.
Now ignore rejected exception silently if executor is shutdown.
This test has been disabled since November 2018, but I was not able to reproduce
the failure. Re-enabling this so we can see the full log and get more context if
it fails again.
Relates to #35514
For some users, the built in authorization mechanism does not fit their
needs and no feature that we offer would allow them to control the
authorization process to meet their needs. In order to support this,
a concept of an AuthorizationEngine is being introduced, which can be
provided using the security extension mechanism.
An AuthorizationEngine is responsible for making the authorization
decisions about a request. The engine is responsible for knowing how to
authorize and can be backed by whatever mechanism a user wants. The
default mechanism is one backed by roles to provide the authorization
decisions. The AuthorizationEngine will be called by the
AuthorizationService, which handles more of the internal workings that
apply in general to authorization within Elasticsearch.
In order to support external authorization services that would back an
authorization engine, the entire authorization process has become
asynchronous, which also includes all calls to the AuthorizationEngine.
The use of roles also leaked out of the AuthorizationService in our
existing code that is not specifically related to roles so this also
needed to be addressed. RequestInterceptor instances sometimes used a
role to ensure a user was not attempting to escalate their privileges.
Addressing this leakage of roles meant that the RequestInterceptor
execution needed to move within the AuthorizationService and that
AuthorizationEngines needed to support detection of whether a user has
more privileges on a name than another. The second area where roles
leaked to the user is in the handling of a few privilege APIs that
could be used to retrieve the user's privileges or ask if a user has
privileges to perform an action. To remove the leakage of roles from
these actions, the AuthorizationService and AuthorizationEngine gained
methods that enabled an AuthorizationEngine to return the response for
these APIs.
Ultimately this feature is the work included in:
#37785#37495#37328#36245#38137#38219Closes#32435