The docs/README shows how to run the :docs:check goal on a subset of pages,
however using the current example fails. Removing the masking character before
the first wildcard fixes the problem.
We have a pile of documentation describing how to rebuild the built in
language analyzers and, previously, our documentation testing framework
made sure that the examples successfully built *an* analyzer but they
didn't assert that the analyzer built by the documentation matches the
built in anlayzer. Unsuprisingly, some of the examples aren't quite
right.
This adds a mechanism that tests that the analyzers built by the docs.
The mechanism is fairly simple and brutal but it seems to be working:
build a hundred random unicode sequences and send them through the
`_analyze` API with the rebuilt analyzer and then again through the
built in analyzer. Then make sure both APIs return the same results.
Each of these calls to `_anlayze` takes about 20ms on my laptop which
seems fine.
Adds a "magic" key to the yaml testing stash mostly for use with
documentation tests. When unstashing an object, `$_path` is the
path into the current position in the object you are unstashing.
This means that in docs tests you can use
`// TESTRESPONSEs/somevalue/$body.${_path}/` to mean "replace
`somevalue` with whatever is the response in the same position."
Compare how you must carefully mock out all the numbers in the profile
response without this change:
```
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"id": "\[2aE02wS1R8q_QFnYu6vDVQ\]\[twitter\]\[1\]"/"id": $body.profile.shards.0.id/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"rewrite_time": 51443/"rewrite_time": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.rewrite_time/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 51306/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.score/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "1873811"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.time_in_nanos/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 2935582/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.build_scorer/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 919297/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.create_weight/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 53876/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.breakdown.next_doc/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "391943"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.time_in_nanos/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 28776/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.score/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 784451/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.build_scorer/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 1669564/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.create_weight/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 10111/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.0.breakdown.next_doc/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "210682"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.time_in_nanos/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"score": 4552/"score": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.score/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"build_scorer": 42602/"build_scorer": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.build_scorer/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"create_weight": 89323/"create_weight": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.create_weight/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"next_doc": 2852/"next_doc": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.query.0.children.1.breakdown.next_doc/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "304311"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector.0.time_in_nanos/]
// TESTRESPONSE[s/"time_in_nanos": "32273"/"time_in_nanos": $body.profile.shards.0.searches.0.collector.0.children.0.time_in_nanos/]
```
To how you can cavalierly mock all the numbers at once with this change:
```
// TESTRESPONSE[s/(?<=[" ])\d+(\.\d+)?/$body.$_path/]
```
I originally wrote this file when we first added snippets testing
and a lot has changed. We've grown quite fond of the
`// TESTRESPONSE[s/foo/bar/]` construct, for example, but the docs
discouraged its use.
Relates to #18160
It looked like it was telling you to add both `// TEST[continued]`
and `// TESTRESPONSE` to the same snippet which doesn't do anything.
Instead it was trying to say that you can have many snippets included
into the same test by doing:
```
request1
```
// CONSOLE
```
response1
```
// TESTRESPONSE
``
request2
```
// CONSOLE
// TEST[continued]
```
response2
```
// TESTRESPONSE
Adds `warnings` syntax to the yaml test that allows you to expect
a `Warning` header that looks like:
```
- do:
warnings:
- '[index] is deprecated'
- quotes are not required because yaml
- but this argument is always a list, never a single string
- no matter how many warnings you expect
get:
index: test
type: test
id: 1
```
These are accessible from the docs with:
```
// TEST[warning:some warning]
```
This should help to force you to update the docs if you deprecate
something. You *must* add the warnings marker to the docs or the build
will fail. While you are there you *should* update the docs to add
deprecation warnings visible in the rendered results.
Adds infrastructure so `gradle :docs:check` will extract tests from
snippets in the documentation and execute the tests. This is included
in `gradle check` so it should happen on CI and during a normal build.
By default each `// AUTOSENSE` snippet creates a unique REST test. These
tests are executed in a random order and the cluster is wiped between
each one. If multiple snippets chain together into a test you can annotate
all snippets after the first with `// TEST[continued]` to have the
generated tests for both snippets joined.
Snippets marked as `// TESTRESPONSE` are checked against the response
of the last action.
See docs/README.asciidoc for lots more.
Closes#12583. That issue is about catching bugs in the docs during build.
This catches *some* bugs in the docs during build which is a good start.
Christoph Büscher
Nik Everett
Lisa Cawley
Daniel Mitterdorfer
Isabel Drost-Fromm
Clinton Gormley