DedicatedClusterSnapshotRestoreIT#testRestoreIndexWithMissingShards took ~1.5 min to finish
due to timeouts that are applied if not all shards are allocated. Now that the index that has
unallocated shareds is not refreshed the test is more reasonable and runs in 15 sec
With this commit we check more precisely on the result of a bulk
request. It could either be ok, fail or be rejected due to resource
constraints. Previously, we have relied that by default we never
get rejected.
However, this is a valid condition even when retrying. With this
commit we check that we either retried often enough that we don't
get rejected *and* if we got rejected that we maxed out the number
of specified retries.
By default, azure does not timeout. This commit adds support for a timeout settings which defaults to 5 minutes.
It's a timeout **per request** not a global timeout for a snapshot request.
It can be defined globally, per account or both. Defaults to `5m`.
```yml
cloud:
azure:
storage:
timeout: 10s
my_account1:
account: your_azure_storage_account1
key: your_azure_storage_key1
default: true
my_account2:
account: your_azure_storage_account2
key: your_azure_storage_key2
timeout: 30s
```
In this example, timeout will be 10s for `my_account1` and 30s for `my_account2`.
Closes#14277.
All those repository settings can also be defined globally in `elasticsearch.yml` file using prefix `repositories.azure.`. For example:
```yml
repositories.azure:
container: backup-container
base_path: backups
chunk_size: 32m
compress": true
```
Closes#13776.
When specifying a string field, you can either do:
```
{
"foo": "bar"
}
```
or
```
{
"foo": {
"value": "bar",
"boost": 42
}
}
```
The latter option is now removed.
Closes#15388
Removal of the pattern node.addShard() -> calculate weight -> node.removeShard() which is expensive as, beside map lookups, it invalidates caching of precomputed values in ModelNode and ModelIndex. Replaced by adding an additional parameter to the weight function which accounts for the added / removed shard.
Today when dynamically mapping a field that is already defined in another type,
we use the regular dynamic mapping logic and try to copy some settings to avoid
introducing conflicts. However this is quite fragile as we don't deal with every
existing setting. This proposes a different approach that will just reuse the
shared field type.
Close#15568
Jim Ferenczi
Adrien Grand
David Pilato
Lee Hinman
Nicholas Knize
Robert Muir
Simon Willnauer
Daniel Mitterdorfer
Robert Muir
Yannick Welsch
Simon Willnauer
Jason Tedor
socurites