This commit updates the cluster allocation explain API documentation to
explain the new request parameters and response formats, and gives
examples of the explain API responses under various scenarios.
Provides an example of using is and an example return description
and explains that we've added descriptions for some tasks but not
even close to all of them. And that we expect to change the
descriptions as we learn more.
Closes#22407
* Fix example
Getting a single task is always detailed, no need to specify.
* Rewrite like imotov wants it
This commit fixes a silly doc bug where the field that represents the
total CPU time consumed by all tasks in the same cgroup was mistakenly
reported as "usage" instead of "usage_nanos".
Relates #21029
Today when parsing a stats request, Elasticsearch silently ignores
incorrect metrics. This commit removes lenient parsing of stats requests
for the nodes stats and indices stats APIs.
Relates #21417
On some systems, cgroups will be available but not configured. And in
some cases, cgroups will be configured, but not for the subsystems that
we are expecting (e.g., cpu and cpuacct). This commit strengthens the
handling of cgroup stats on such systems.
Relates #21094
Today when parsing a request, Elasticsearch silently ignores incorrect
(including parameters with typos) or unused parameters. This is bad as
it leads to requests having unintended behavior (e.g., if a user hits
the _analyze API and misspell the "tokenizer" then Elasticsearch will
just use the standard analyzer, completely against intentions).
This commit removes lenient URL parameter parsing. The strategy is
simple: when a request is handled and a parameter is touched, we mark it
as such. Before the request is actually executed, we check to ensure
that all parameters have been consumed. If there are remaining
parameters yet to be consumed, we fail the request with a list of the
unconsumed parameters. An exception has to be made for parameters that
format the response (as opposed to controlling the request); for this
case, handlers are able to provide a list of parameters that should be
excluded from tripping the unconsumed parameters check because those
parameters will be used in formatting the response.
Additionally, some inconsistencies between the parameters in the code
and in the docs are corrected.
Relates #20722
Funny node names have been removed in #19456 and replaced by UUID. This commit removes these obsolete node names and replace them by real UUIDs in the documentation.
closes#20065
and be much more stingy about what we consider a console candidate.
* Add `// CONSOLE` to check-running
* Fix version in some snippets
* Mark groovy snippets as groovy
* Fix versions in plugins
* Fix language marker errors
* Fix language parsing in snippets
This adds support for snippets who's language is written like
`[source, txt]` and `["source","js",subs="attributes,callouts"]`.
This also makes language required for snippets which is nice because
then we can be sure we can grep for snippets in a particular language.
The mem section was buggy in cluster stats and removed. It is now added back with the same structure as in node stats, containing total memory, available memory, used memory and percentages. All the values are the sum of all the nodes across the cluster (or at least the ones that we were able to get the values from).
* Params improvements to Cluster Health API wait for shards
Previously, the cluster health API used a strictly numeric value
for `wait_for_active_shards`. However, with the introduction of
ActiveShardCount and the removal of write consistency level for
replication operations, `wait_for_active_shards` is used for
write operations to represent values for ActiveShardCount. This
commit moves the cluster health API's usage of `wait_for_active_shards`
to be consistent with its usage in the write operation APIs.
This commit also changes `wait_for_relocating_shards` from a
numeric value to a simple boolean value `wait_for_no_relocating_shards`
to set whether the cluster health operation should wait for
all relocating shards to complete relocation.
* Addresses code review comments
* Don't be lenient if `wait_for_relocating_shards` is set
This should make them easier to read and adds them to the test suite
I changed the example from a two node cluster to a single node cluster
because that is what we have running in the integration tests. It is also
what a user just starting out is likely to see so I think that is ok.
This adds a get task API that supports GET /_tasks/${taskId} and
removes that responsibility from the list tasks API. The get task
API supports wait_for_complation just as the list tasks API does
but doesn't support any of the list task API's filters. In exchange,
it supports falling back to the .results index when the task isn't
running any more. Like any good GET API it 404s when it doesn't
find the task.
Then we change reindex, update-by-query, and delete-by-query to
persist the task result when wait_for_completion=false. The leads
to the neat behavior that, once you start a reindex with
wait_for_completion=false, you can fetch the result of the task by
using the get task API and see the result when it has finished.
Also rename the .results index to .tasks.
Today if a shard fails during initialization phase due to misconfiguration, broken disks,
missing analyzers, not installed plugins etc. elasticsaerch keeps on trying to initialize
or rather allocate that shard. Yet, in the worst case scenario this ends in an endless
allocation loop. To prevent this loop and all it's sideeffects like spamming log files over
and over again this commit adds an allocation decider that stops allocating a shard that
failed more than N times in a row to allocate. The number or retries can be configured via
`index.allocation.max_retry` and it's default is set to `5`. Once the setting is updated
shards with less failures than the number set per index will be allowed to allocate again.
Internally we maintain a counter on the UnassignedInfo that is reset to `0` once the shards
has been started.
Relates to #18417
This commit adds a variety of real disk metrics for the block devices
that back Elasticsearch data paths. A collection of statistics are read
from /proc/diskstats and are used to report the raw metrics for
operations and read/write bytes.
Relates #15915
Adds infrastructure so `gradle :docs:check` will extract tests from
snippets in the documentation and execute the tests. This is included
in `gradle check` so it should happen on CI and during a normal build.
By default each `// AUTOSENSE` snippet creates a unique REST test. These
tests are executed in a random order and the cluster is wiped between
each one. If multiple snippets chain together into a test you can annotate
all snippets after the first with `// TEST[continued]` to have the
generated tests for both snippets joined.
Snippets marked as `// TESTRESPONSE` are checked against the response
of the last action.
See docs/README.asciidoc for lots more.
Closes#12583. That issue is about catching bugs in the docs during build.
This catches *some* bugs in the docs during build which is a good start.
By default, tasks are grouped by node. However, task execution in elasticsearch can be quite complex and an individual task that runs on a coordinating node can have many subtasks running on other nodes in the cluster. This commit makes it possible to list task grouped by common parents instead of by node. When this option is enabled all subtask are grouped under the coordinating node task that started all subtasks in the group. To group tasks by common parents, use the following syntax:
GET /tasks?group_by=parents
This adds a new `/_cluster/allocation/explain` API that explains why a
shard can or cannot be allocated to nodes in the cluster. Additionally,
it will show where the master *desires* to put the shard, according to
the `ShardsAllocator`.
It looks like this:
```
GET /_cluster/allocation/explain?pretty
{
"index": "only-foo",
"shard": 0,
"primary": false
}
```
Though, you can optionally send an empty body, which means "explain the
allocation for the first unassigned shard you find".
The output when a shard is unassigned looks like this:
```
{
"shard" : {
"index" : "only-foo",
"index_uuid" : "KnW0-zELRs6PK84l0r38ZA",
"id" : 0,
"primary" : false
},
"assigned" : false,
"unassigned_info" : {
"reason" : "INDEX_CREATED",
"at" : "2016-03-22T20:04:23.620Z"
},
"nodes" : {
"V-Spi0AyRZ6ZvKbaI3691w" : {
"node_name" : "Susan Storm",
"node_attributes" : {
"bar" : "baz"
},
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : 0.06666675,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "filter",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "node does not match index include filters [foo:\"bar\"]"
} ]
},
"Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g" : {
"node_name" : "Slipstream",
"node_attributes" : {
"bar" : "baz",
"foo" : "bar"
},
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : -1.3833332,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "same_shard",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "the shard cannot be allocated on the same node id [Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g] on which it already exists"
} ]
},
"PzdyMZGXQdGhqTJHF_hGgA" : {
"node_name" : "The Symbiote",
"node_attributes" : { },
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : 2.3166666,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "filter",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "node does not match index include filters [foo:\"bar\"]"
} ]
}
}
}
```
And when the shard *is* assigned, the output looks like:
```
{
"shard" : {
"index" : "only-foo",
"index_uuid" : "KnW0-zELRs6PK84l0r38ZA",
"id" : 0,
"primary" : true
},
"assigned" : true,
"assigned_node_id" : "Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g",
"nodes" : {
"V-Spi0AyRZ6ZvKbaI3691w" : {
"node_name" : "Susan Storm",
"node_attributes" : {
"bar" : "baz"
},
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : 1.4499999,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "filter",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "node does not match index include filters [foo:\"bar\"]"
} ]
},
"Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g" : {
"node_name" : "Slipstream",
"node_attributes" : {
"bar" : "baz",
"foo" : "bar"
},
"final_decision" : "CURRENTLY_ASSIGNED",
"weight" : 0.0,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "same_shard",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "the shard cannot be allocated on the same node id [Qc6VL8c5RWaw1qXZ0Rg57g] on which it already exists"
} ]
},
"PzdyMZGXQdGhqTJHF_hGgA" : {
"node_name" : "The Symbiote",
"node_attributes" : { },
"final_decision" : "NO",
"weight" : 3.6999998,
"decisions" : [ {
"decider" : "filter",
"decision" : "NO",
"explanation" : "node does not match index include filters [foo:\"bar\"]"
} ]
}
}
}
```
Only "NO" decisions are returned by default, but all decisions can be
shown by specifying the `?include_yes_decisions=true` parameter in the
request.
Resolves#14593
The ingest stats include the following statistics:
* `ingest.total.count`- The total number of document ingested during the lifetime of this node
* `ingest.total.time_in_millis` - The total time spent on ingest preprocessing documents during the lifetime of this node
* `ingest.total.current` - The total number of documents currently being ingested.
* `ingest.total.failed` - The total number ingest preprocessing operations failed during the lifetime of this node
Also these stats are returned on a per pipeline basis.
Internally the put pipeline API uses this information in node info API to validate if all specified processors in a pipeline exist on all nodes in the cluster.
The cluster stats api now returns counts for each node role. The `master_data`, `master_only`, `data_only` and `client` fields have been removed from the response in favour of `master`, `data`, `ingest` and `coordinating_only`. The same node can have multiple roles, hence contribute to multiple roles counts. Every node is implicitly a coordinating node, so whenever a node has no explicit roles, it will be counted as coordinating only.
This commit modifies the load_average in the node stats API response
to be an object containing the one-minute, five-minute and
fifteen-minute load averages as fields (if those values are
available). Additionally, this commit modifies the cat nodes API
response to format the one-minute, five-minute and fifteen-minute load
averages as null if any of the respective values are not available.