The wildcard example leads to display a 404 page with the PageNotFoundComponent. But before, there is a wildcard to redirect to the FirstComponent and because of the routes order the FirstComponent will be displayed; which it is not the target of the wildcard route example code. Also, fixing some wildcard docregions
PR Close#37127
One of the ivy acceptance tests currently fails in IE10. This
is because we recently added a new test that asserts that injecting
`ViewRef` results in a `NullInjectorError`.
Due to limitations in TypeScript and in polyfills for `setPrototypeOf`,
the error cannot be thrown as `ViewRef` is always considered injectable.
In reality, `ViewRef` should not be injectable, as explicitly noted
in c00f4ab2ae.
There seems no way to simulate the proper prototype chain in such
browsers that do not natively support `__proto__`, so TypeScript
and `core-js` polyfills simply break the prototype chain and
assign inherited properties directly on `ViewRef`. i.e. so that
`ViewRef.__NG_ELEMENT_ID__` exists and DI picks it up.
There is a way for TypeScript to theoretically generate proper
prototype chain in ES5 output, but they intend to only bother
about the proper prototype chain in ES6 where `setPrototypeOf`
etc. are offically standarized. See the response:
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/1601#issuecomment-94892833.
PR Close#37892
This commit updates the version of Angular CLI used in angular.io to
version 10.0.1. It also reverts some changes (namely commits 38dfbc775f
and eee2fd22e0) which were made due to an older bug that is fixed in
the latest version. See #37688 for more details.
Fixes#37699
PR Close#37898
This commit removes some duplicate imports of Material themes and
theming-related utilities. While this change does not have any impact on
the size of the generated `styles.css` file, it silences a build warning
pointing to [Avoiding duplicated theming styles][1].
[1]: db4b0cd1bf/guides/duplicate-theming-styles.md
PR Close#37898
This commit updates the version of Angular Components used in angular.io
to version 10.0.1. It also updates the angular.io app to adapt to
breaking changes.
PR Close#37898
This commit updates the version of Angular framework used in angular.io
to version 10.0.2. It also features a commit message with a 100+ chars
long body.
PR Close#37898
Before this refactoring we had the WrappedValue class in
2 separate places:
- packages/core/src/change_detection/change_detection_util.ts
- packages/core/src/util/WrappedValue.ts
This commit removes the duplicate, leaving the class that has
the deprecation notice.
PR Close#37940
This commit breaks up the testing document into nine total documents, with each document focusing on an existing section of the current testing documentation. There are no content changes.
PR Close#37957
The motivation behind this change is to improve the productivity in the angular/angular repo
without sacrificing the original goal of having better understanding of changes within
the repo.
When the minBodyLength limit was originally introduced the goal was simple: force
committers to provide more contextual information for each change coming into the
repo. Too often we found ourselves in a situation where nobody understood what
motivated some of the changes and we needed more contextual info to know if the
change was correct, desirable, and still relevant (at a later point in time).
When the limit was introduced, we needed to pick a minimum body length - given no
data, and frustration with even big changes being committed with just a words in
the subject (along the lines of "fix(core): fixing a bug"), we overcompensated
and started off with a really high bar of minBodyLength set to 100 chars.
This turned out to be impractical and created a big friction point in making valid
changes in the angular/angular repo, and in fact caused some of the refactorings
and smaller changes to be either skipped or combined into other commits which
increased the burden for code reviewers.
The evidence in the friction points can be seen in the number of PRs that fail to pass
the current lint check on the first try, but more importantly also in the "creative"
writing that some of the committers are forced to resort to in order to satisfy the
current checks. Examples:
- 286fbf42c6
- b2816a1536
Given that we primarily care to document the motivation behind each change
(the answer to the ultimate question: WHY?), I've collected several *common* &
*valid* commit messages that are minimalistic and capture the WHY sufficiently:
```
Refactoring for readability. => 28 chars
Improving variable naming. => 26 chars
Additional test coverage. => 25 chars
Cleaning up the code. => 21 chars
Simplified the code. => 20 chars
```
These commit message bodies in addition to the commit message subject should
sufficiently satisfy the need to capture the context and motivation behind each
change without creating an undue burden on committers.
Example minimalistic commit message:
------
refactor(core): cleanup the expression parser
Simplifying the code.
----
Given this research, I'm decreasing the minBodyLenth in angular/angular to 20 chars.
The commit message quality can be additionally improved by implementing a commit message
template via `.gitmessage` that will guide the committers in following our commit message
guidelines via instructions provided in the form of in-the-flow help rather than as an after
the fact lint check.
More info: https://thoughtbot.com/blog/better-commit-messages-with-a-gitmessage-template
I'm intentionally deferring such change for a separate PR as not to complicate or delay the
minBodyLength limit decrease.
PR Close#37949
The ngtsc testing packages for file_system and logging were missing from the bazel deps rules, which means that they were not included in the releases
PR Close#37977
Often changelogs are generated from the patch branch and then
cherry-picked into the `CHANGELOG.md` file in `master` for
better access and readability. This is problematic though as
`conventional-changelog` (the tool we use for generating the
changelog), will duplicate commits when a future changelog
is generated from `master` then (i.e. for a new minor release).
This happens because conventional-changelog always generates the
changelog from the latest tag in a given branch to `HEAD`. The
tag in the patch branch does not correspond to any SHA in `master`
so the intersection of commits is not automatically omitted.
We work around this naively (until we have a better tool provided
by dev-infra), by deduping commits that are already part of the
changelog. This has proven to work as expected in the components
repo.
PR Close#37956
This commit includes a couple of minor fixes to docs related to updating
to v10:
- Fix markdown link in "Updating to Angular version 10" guide.
- Correctly display numbered list in
"Solution-style `tsconfig.json` migration" guide.
PR Close#37897
The merge script uses `git cherry-pick` for both the API merge strategy
and the autosquash strategy. It uses cherry-pick to push commits to
different target branches (e.g. into the `10.0.x` branch).
Those commits never point to the commits that landed in the primary
Github branch though. For the autosquash strategy the pull request number
is always included, so there is a way to go back to the source. On the other
hand though, for commits cherry-picked in the API merge strategy, the
pull request number might not always be included (due to Github's
implementation of the rebase merge method).
e.g.
27f52711c0
For those cases we'd want to link the cherry-picked commits to the
original commits so that the corresponding PR is easier to track
down. This is not needed for the autosquash strategy (as outlined
before), but it would have been good for consistency. Unfortunately
though this would rather complicate the strategy as the autosquash
strategy cherry-picks directly from the PR head, so the SHAs that
are used in the primary branch are not known.
PR Close#37889
As part of angular.io's responsive layout, the menu shown in the top-bar
is collapsed into the sidenav on narrow screens at the point where the
search-bar (on the right side of the top-bar) would overlap with the
menu's nav-items.
Previously, the value used as break-point would work on marketing pages,
where the hamburger button is not shown on wide screens. However, on
docs pages (where the hamburger button is always shown, pushing the menu
further to the right), the search-bar would still overlap the menu
nav-items on some resolutions.
This commit fixes it by raising the screen width threshold at a value
that ensures there is no overlap even on pages where the hamburger
button is visible alongside the top-bar menu.
Fixes#37937
PR Close#37938
As part of angular.io's responsive layout, the following rules are
applied:
- On wide screens, a menu is shown in the top-bar and the sidenav is
shown side-by-side with the docs content.
- On narrow screens, the top-menu is moved from the top-bar to the
sidenav and the sidenav is closed by default and floats over the
content when manually opened.
Previously, the break-points at which the top-menu was shown in the
top-bar and the sidenav was shown side-by-side with the content were the
same (using a single variable).
This commit decouples the two break-points to make it possible to use
different values in the future.
PR Close#37938
Use a Sass variable for the screen width break-point at which the
top-bar hamburger button is hidden/shown. This allows more easily
updating the break-point.
PR Close#37938
When loading a translation file we ask each `TranslationParser`
whether it can parse the file. Occasionally, this check can find
errors in the file that would be useful to the developer. For example
if the file has invalid XML.
This commit deprecates the previous `canParse()` method and replaces it
with a new `analyze()` method. This returns an object that includes a
boolean `canParse` and then either a `hint` if it can parse the file,
or a `diagnostics` object filled with any messages that can be used to
diagnose problems with the format of the file.
Closes #37901
PR Close#37909
In `aio/`, we have a mechanism to apply patches in a `postinstall` hook.
See `aio/tools/cli-patches/README.md` for more info.
Previously, we had to update `aio/tools/cli-patches/patch.js` to list
each `.patch` file separately. While working on #37688, I found it
helpful for the script to automatically pick up `.patch` files.
This commit updates the script to automatically pick up and apply
`.patch` files from the `aio/tools/cli-patches/` directory. If one wants
to keep a `.patch` file but not apply it, they can change the file's
extension or move it to a sub-directory (without having to update the
script).
PR Close#37896
Currently when the `plural` or `select` keywords in an ICU contain trailing spaces (e.g. `{count, select , ...}`), these spaces are also included into the key names in ICU vars (e.g. "VAR_SELECT "). These trailing spaces are not desirable, since they will later be converted into `_` symbols while normalizing placeholder names, thus causing mismatches at runtime (i.e. placeholder will not be replaced with the correct value). This commit updates the code to trim these spaces while generating an object with placeholders, to make sure the runtime logic can replace these placeholders with the right values.
PR Close#37866
The logic to exclude certain types of commits (specifically 'docs' ones) was implemented in c5b125b7db. The ng-dev config was updated in the followup commit acf3cff9ee, but there was a typo that prevented the new logic from being activated. This commit updates the name of the config option in the ng-dev config to the right one (minBodyLengthTypeExcludes).
PR Close#37862
CanLoad guards are processed in asynchronous manner with the following rules:
* If all guards return `true`, operator returns `true`;
* `false` and `UrlTree` values wait for higher priority guards to resolve;
* Highest priority `false` or `UrlTree` value will be returned.
`prioritizedGuardValue` uses `combineLatest` which in order subscribes to each Observable immediately (not waiting when previous one completes that `concatAll` do). So it makes some advantages in order to run them concurrently. Respectively, a time to resolve all guards will be reduced.
PR Close#37523
This PR changes the logic for determining when to skip route processing from
using the URL of the last attempted navigation to the actual resulting URL after
that transition.
Because guards may prevent navigation and reset the browser URL, the raw
URL of the previous transition may not match the actual URL of the
browser at the end of the navigation process. For that reason, we need to use
`urlAfterRedirects` instead.
Other notes:
These checks in scheduleNavigation were added in eb2ceff4ba
The test still passes and, more surprisingly, passes if the checks are removed
completely. There have likely been changes to the navigation handling that
handle the test in a different way. That said, it still appears to be important
to keep the checks there in some capacity because it does affect how many
navigation events occur. This addresses an issue that came up in #16710: https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/16710#issuecomment-634869739
This also partially addresses #13586 in fixing history for imperative
navigations that are cancelled by guards.
PR Close#37716
After recent correction to left nav TOC, the link to this new page was temporarily removed. This restores it to next, because the page is not yet available in stable.
PR Close#37855
The current code is missing a single quote at the end of the import.
(cherry picked from commit e13171ea2960dd0fa0666cb964b53799d2883e3a)
PR Close#37854
Incremental compilation allows for the output state of one compilation to be
reused as input to the next compilation. This involves retaining references
to instances from prior compilations, which must be done carefully to avoid
memory leaks.
This commit fixes such a leak with a complicated retention chain:
* `TrackedIncrementalBuildStrategy` unnecessarily hangs on to the previous
`IncrementalDriver` (state of the previous compilation) once the current
compilation completes.
In general this is unnecessary, but should be safe as long as the chain
only goes back one level - if the `IncrementalDriver` doesn't retain any
previous `TrackedIncrementalBuildStrategy` instances. However, this does
happen:
* `NgCompiler` indirectly causes retention of previous `NgCompiler`
instances (and thus previous `TrackedIncrementalBuildStrategy` instances)
through accidental capture of the `this` context in a closure created in
its constructor. This closure is wrapped in a `ts.ModuleResolutionCache`
used to create a `ModuleResolver` class, which is passed to the program's
`TraitCompiler` on construction.
* The `IncrementalDriver` retains a reference to the `TraitCompiler` of the
previous compilation, completing the reference chain.
The final retention chain thus looks like:
* `TrackedIncrementalBuildStrategy` of current program
* `.previous`: `IncrementalDriver` of previous program
* `.lastGood.traitCompiler`: `TraitCompiler`
* `.handlers[..].moduleResolver.moduleResolutionCache`: cache
* (via `getCanonicalFileName` closure): `NgCompiler`
* `.incrementalStrategy`: `TrackedIncrementalBuildStrategy` of previous
program.
The closure link is the "real" leak here. `NgCompiler` is creating a closure
for `getCanonicalFileName`, delegating to its
`this.adapter.getCanonicalFileName`, for the purposes of creating a
`ts.ModuleResolutionCache`. The fact that the closure references
`NgCompiler` thus eventually causes previous `NgCompiler` iterations to be
retained. This is also potentially problematic due to the shared nature of
`ts.ModuleResolutionCache`, which is potentially retained across multiple
compilations intentionally.
This commit fixes the first two links in the retention chain: the build
strategy is patched to not retain a `previous` pointer, and the `NgCompiler`
is patched to not create a closure in the first place, but instead pass a
bound function. This ensures that the `NgCompiler` does not retain previous
instances of itself in the first place, even if the build strategy does
end up retaining the previous incremental state unnecessarily.
The third link (`IncrementalDriver` unnecessarily retaining the whole
`TraitCompiler`) is not addressed in this commit as it's a more
architectural problem that will require some refactoring. However, the leak
potential of this retention is eliminated thanks to fixing the first two
issues.
PR Close#37835
This commit fixes a spelling error in the word error in the
observables.md guide. It is currently
spelled errror and the mistake is not intentional.
PR Close#36437
change in the definition of providedIn:any any instance creates a singleton instance
for each lazy loaded module and one instance for eager loaded module
PR Close#35292
PR https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/37523 failed when trying to use `rxjs delay` operator
inside `fakeAsync`, and the reasons are:
1. we need to import `rxjs-fake-async` patch to make the integration work.
2. since in `angular` repo, the bazel target `/tools/testing:node` not using `zone-testing` bundle,
instead it load `zone-spec` packages seperately, so it causes one issue which is the `zone.js/testing/fake-async`
package is not loaded, we do have a fallback logic under `packages/core/testing` calles `fake_async_fallback`,
but the logic is out of date with `fake-async` under `zone.js` package.
So this PR, I updated the content of `fake_async_fallback` to make it consistent with
`fake-async`. And I will make another PR to try to remove the `fallback` logic.
PR Close#37680
Close#33657
in jasmine 3.5, there is a new feature, user can pass a properties object to `jasmine.createSpyObj`
```
const spy = jasmine.createSpyObj('spy', ['method1'], {prop1: 'foo'});
expect(spy.prop1).toEqual('foo');
```
This case will not work for Angular TestBed, for example,
```
describe('AppComponent', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
//Note the third parameter
// @ts-ignore
const someServiceSpy = jasmine.createSpyObj('SomeService', ['someFunction'], ['aProperty']);
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
declarations: [
AppComponent
],
providers: [
{provide: SomeService, useValue: someServiceSpy},
]
}).compileComponents();
});
it('should create the app', () => {
//spyObj will have someFunction, but will not have aProperty
let spyObj = TestBed.get(SomeService);
});
```
Because `jasmine.createSpyObj` will create the `aProperty` with `enumerable=false`,
and `TestBed.configureTestingModule` will try to copy all the properties from spyObj to
the injected service instance. And because `enumerable` is false, so the property (here is aProperty)
will not be copied.
This PR will monkey patch the `jasmine.createSpyObj` and make sure the new property's
`enumerable=true`.
PR Close#34624
When ngcc creates an entry-point program, the `allowJs` option is enabled
in order to operate on the JavaScript source files of the entry-point.
A side-effect of this approach is that external modules that don't ship
declaration files will also have their JavaScript source files loaded
into the program, as the `allowJs` flag allows for them to be imported.
This may pose an issue in certain edge cases, where ngcc would inadvertently
operate on these external modules. This can introduce all sorts of undesirable
behavior and incompatibilities, e.g. the reflection host that is selected for
the entry-point's format could be incompatible with that of the external
module's JavaScript bundles.
To avoid these kinds of issues, module resolution that would resolve to
a JavaScript file located outside of the package will instead be rejected,
as if the file would not exist. This would have been the behavior when
`allowJs` is set to false, which is the case in typical Angular compilations.
Fixes#37508
PR Close#37596
Changes `isWithinPackage` to take an `AbsoluteFsPath` instead of `ts.SourceFile`,
to allow for an upcoming change to use it when no `ts.SourceFile` is available,
but just a path.
PR Close#37596
The major sections Angular Libraries, Schematics, and CLI Builders appear twice, in their old location under Techniques, and in the new correct location under Extending Angular
PR Close#37827
Previously, event listeners for component output events attached on an
Angular custom element before inserting it into the DOM (i.e. before
instantiating the underlying component) didn't fire for events emitted
during initialization lifecycle hooks, such as `ngAfterContentInit`,
`ngAfterViewInit`, `ngOnChanges` (initial call) and `ngOnInit`.
The reason was that `NgElementImpl` [subscribed to events][1] _after_
calling [ngElementStrategy#connect()][2], which is where the
[initial change detection][3] takes place (running the initialization
lifecycle hooks).
This commit fixes this by:
1. Ensuring `ComponentNgElementStrategy#events` is defined and available
for subscribing to, even before instantiating the component.
2. Changing `NgElementImpl` to subscribe to `NgElementStrategy#events`
(if available) before calling `NgElementStrategy#connect()` (which
initializes the component instance) if available.
3. Falling back to the old behavior (subscribing to `events` after
calling `connect()` for strategies that do not initialize `events`
before their `connect()` is run).
NOTE:
By falling back to the old behavior when `NgElementStrategy#events` is
not initialized before calling `NgElementStrategy#connect()`, we avoid
breaking existing custom `NgElementStrategy` implementations (with
@remackgeek's [ElementZoneStrategy][4] being a commonly used example).
Jira issue: [FW-2010](https://angular-team.atlassian.net/browse/FW-2010)
[1]: c0143cb2ab/packages/elements/src/create-custom-element.ts (L167-L170)
[2]: c0143cb2ab/packages/elements/src/create-custom-element.ts (L164)
[3]: c0143cb2ab/packages/elements/src/component-factory-strategy.ts (L158)
[4]: f1b6699495/projects/elements-zone-strategy/src/lib/element-zone-strategy.tsFixes#36141
PR Close#37570
Abdellatif Ait boudad
Daniel
Paul Gschwendtner
George Kalpakas
pkozlowski-opensource
Kapunahele Wong
tphobe9312
Igor Minar
Alex Rickabaugh
Olivier Combe
Pete Bacon Darwin
Andrew Kushnir
Ruben Schuckit
Omar Hasan
Dmitrij Kuba
Andrew Scott
Judy Bogart
Celilsemi Sam Erkiner
Alan Agius
Sonu Kapoor
Jaskaran Singh
Santosh Yadav
JiaLiPassion
JoostK
nobobo1234
Maksymilian Sielicki
Amadou Sall