Prior to this change in Ivy we had strict check that disabled non-unique #localRefs usage within a given template. While this limitation was technically present in View Engine, in many cases View Engine neglected this restriction and as a result, some apps relied on a fact that multiple non-unique #localRefs can be defined and utilized to query elements via @ViewChild(ren) and @ContentChild(ren). In order to provide better compatibility with View Engine, this commit removes existing restriction.
As a part of this commit, are few tests were added to verify VE and Ivy compatibility in most common use-cases where multiple non-unique #localRefs were used.
PR Close#28627
We need to support rendering in contexts like web workers where
nodes are emulated and properties may not be set directly. This
commit gates property validation checks to environments that have
real Node objects.
FW-1043 #resolve
PR Close#28610
There is nothing browser specific in those tests and fakeAsync is supported on node.
Testing / debugging on node is often faster than on Karma.
PR Close#28593
This commit adds a devMode-only check which will throw if a user
attempts to bind a property that does not match a directive
input or a known HTML property.
Example:
```
<div [unknownProp]="someValue"></div>
```
The above will throw because "unknownProp" is not a known
property of HTMLDivElement.
This check is similar to the check executed in View Engine during
template parsing, but occurs at runtime instead of compile-time.
Note: This change uncovered an existing bug with host binding
inheritance, so some Material tests had to be turned off. They
will be fixed in an upcoming PR.
PR Close#28537
Prior to this change we only checked whether current lView has a next pointer while traversing tNode tree. However in some cases this pointer can be undefined and we need to look up parents chain to find suitable next pointer. This commit adds the logic of searching for the next pointer taking parents chain into account.
PR Close#28533
`LView` `HOST` was set in most cases right after creating `LView`.
This makes the API cleaner by explicitly passing it ont `createLView`.
PR Close#28461
When we first started writing tests for Ivy, we did not yet have a
compatible compiler. For this reason, we set up the Ivy runtime tests
to run with generated code that we wrote by hand (instead of real code
generated by the compiler).
Now that we have a working Ivy compiler and TestBed infrastructure
that is compatible with Ivy, we should start writing integration
tests that leverage them (no more handwritten generated code!). This
will prevent bugs where the compiler code and runtime code become
out of sync (which is easy if they are tested separately). And
eventually, we should migrate all the existing runtime tests in
"core/test/render3" to TestBed and ngtsc.
To kick off this effort, this commit migrates some existing tests
from "core/test/render3/exports_spec.ts" and saves them in a new file
with the same name in the "core/test/acceptance" folder.
PR Close#28534
i18n instructions create text nodes dynamically and save them between bindings and the expando block in `LView`. e.g., they try to create the following order in `LView`.
```
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- | -- expando (dirs, injectors) -- |
```
Each time a new text node is created, it is pushed to the end of the array and the `expandoStartIndex` marker is incremented, so the section begins slightly later. This happens in `allocExpando`.
This is fine if no directives have been created yet. The end of the array will be in the "dynamic text node" section.
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- |
However, this approach doesn't work if dynamic text nodes are created after directives are matched (for example when the directive uses host bindings). In that case, there are already directives and injectors saved in the "expando" section. So pushing to the end of `LView` actually pushes after the expando section. What we get is this:
```
| -- elements -- | -- bindings -- | -- dynamic i18n text -- | -- expando -- | -- dynamic i18n text-- |
```
In this case, the `expandoStartIndex` shouldn't be incremented because we are not inserting anything before the expando section (it's now after the expando section). But because it is incremented in the code right now, it's now pointing to an index in the middle of the expando section.
This PR fixes that so that we only increment the `expandoStartIndex` if nothing was pushed into the expando section.
FW-978 #resolve
PR Close#28424
Currently, DOM node removal called `removeChild` on the saved parent
node when destroying a component. However, this will fail if the
component has been manually moved in the DOM. This change makes the
removal always use the node's real `parentNode` and ignore the provided
`parent`.
PR Close#28455
Ivy allows Components to extend Directives (but not the other way around) and as a result we may have Component and Directive annotations present at the same time. The logic that resolves annotations to pick the necessary one didn't take this into account and as a result Components were recognized as Directives (and vice versa) in case of inheritance. This change updates the resolution logic by picking known annotation that is the nearest one (in inheritance tree) and compares it with expected type. That should help avoid mis-classification of Components/Directives during resolution.
PR Close#28439
Improve the stacktrace for `R3Injector` errors by adding the source component (or module) that tried to inject the missing provider, as well as the name of the injector which triggered the error (`R3Injector`).
e.g.:
```
R3InjectorError(SomeModule)[car -> SportsCar]:
NullInjectorError: No provider for SportsCar!
```
FW-807 #resolve
FW-875 #resolve
PR Close#28207
createInjector() is an Ivy-only API that should not have
been exported as part of the public API. This commit removes
the export. It will be re-exported when Ivy is released.
PR Close#28509
Fixes Ivy not passing thrown errors along to the `ErrorHandler`.
**Note:** the failing test had to be reworked a little bit, because it has some assertions that depend on an error context being logged, however Ivy doesn't keep track of the error context.
This PR resolves FW-840.
PR Close#28447
In Ivy, we support a new manual mode that allows for stricter control
over change detection in OnPush components. Specifically, in this mode,
events do not automatically mark OnPush views as dirty. Only changed
inputs and manual calls to `markDirty()` actually mark a view dirty.
However, this mode cannot be the default for OnPush components if we
want to be backwards compatible with View Engine. This commit re-adds
the legacy logic for OnPush components where events always mark views
dirty and makes it the default behavior.
Note: It is still TODO to add a public API for manual change detection.
PR Close#28474
Due to the fact that the test in 'ng_module_integration_spec.ts' relied on internal VE data structures (the '_def' field) to verify the state and the structure has changed in Ivy, this commit adds an Ivy version of the same test.
PR Close#28477
Previously, attempting to destroy a view with listeners more than once
throws an error during event listener cleanup. This happens because
`cleanup` field on the `TView` has already been cleared out by the time
the second destruction runs.
The `destroyed` flag on LView was previously being set in the `destroyLView` function,
but this flag was never _checked_ anywhere in the codebase. This commit
moves _setting_ this flag to the `cleanupView` function, just before
destroy hooks are called. This is necessary because the destroy hooks
can contain arbitrary user code, such as (surprise!) attempting to
destroy the view (again). We also add a check to `destroyLView` to skip
already-destroyed views. This prevents the cleanup code path from running twice.
PR Close#28413
In View Engine, we supported @Input and @ContentChild annotations
on the same property. This feature was somewhat brittle because
it would only work for static queries, so it would break if a
content child was passed in wrapped in an *ngIf. Due to the
inconsistent behavior and low usage both internally and externally,
we will likely be deprecating it in the next version, and it does
not make sense to perpetuate it in Ivy.
This commit ensures that we now throw in Ivy if we encounter the
two annotations on the same property.
PR Close#28415
Prior to this change we didn't verify types passed to bootstrap as a part of NgModule semantics verification. Now we check whether all types passed to bootstrap are actually Components.
PR Close#28386
This commit updates the token used in fakeAsync test to the one available in both VE and R3 TestBeds. The goal of the test is to verify that fakeAsync works with inject function, so the actual token that is used for a test is irrelevant in that case. The logic to retrieve tokens from compiler injector (that the comment in "fixmeIvy" refers to) was implemented in PR #28196.
PR Close#28383
Prior to this change we may encounter some errors (like pipes being used where they should not be used) while compiling Host Bindings and Listeners. With this update we move validation logic to the analyze phase and throw an error if something is wrong. This also aligns error messages between Ivy and VE.
PR Close#28356
Adds the information that the templateUrl and styleUrls options supports only relative Urls.
Adds more information about relative paths and absolute URLs in project metadata.
PR Close#27962
When testing whether `value` is an object, use the ideal sequence of
strictly not equal to `null` followed by `typeof value === 'object'`
consistently. Specifically there's no point in using double equal with
`null` since `undefined` is ruled out by the `typeof` check.
Also avoid the unnecessary ToBoolean check on `value.ngOnDestroy` in
`hasOnDestroy()`, since the `typeof value.ngOnDestroy === 'function'`
will only let closures pass and all closures are truish (with the
notable exception of `document.all`, but that shouldn't be relevant
for the `ngOnDestroy` hook).
PR Close#28400
Previously, these components were not added to the view tree for the
(fake) root view in which they were bootstrapped. Without this,
root view destruction does not work as expected since the root view's
children are not present to be also destroyed.
PR Close#28409
This commit updates test that was added after Content Queries inheritance fix (that renames some instructions) was merged into master. The test used previous version of instructions, thus causing failures after merging Content Queries inheritance fix.
PR Close#28414
Prior to this change contentQueriesRefresh functions that represent refresh logic for @ContentQuery list were not composable, which caused problems in case one Directive inherits another one and both of them contain Content Queries. Due to the fact that we used indices to reference queries in refresh function, results were placed into wrong Queries. In order to avoid that we no longer use indices to reference queries and instead maintain current content query index while iterating through them. This allows us to compose contentQueriesRefresh functions and make inheritance feature work with Content Queries.
PR Close#28324
By its nature, Ivy alters the import graph of a TS program, adding imports
where template dependencies exist. For example, if ComponentA uses PipeB
in its template, Ivy will insert an import of PipeB into the file in which
ComponentA is declared.
Any insertion of an import into a program has the potential to introduce a
cycle into the import graph. If for some reason the file in which PipeB is
declared imports the file in which ComponentA is declared (maybe it makes
use of a service or utility function that happens to be in the same file as
ComponentA) then this could create an import cycle. This turns out to
happen quite regularly in larger Angular codebases.
TypeScript and the Ivy runtime have no issues with such cycles. However,
other tools are not so accepting. In particular the Closure Compiler is
very anti-cycle.
To mitigate this problem, it's necessary to detect when the insertion of
an import would create a cycle. ngtsc can then use a different strategy,
known as "remote scoping", instead of directly writing a reference from
one component to another. Under remote scoping, a function
'setComponentScope' is called after the declaration of the component's
module, which does not require the addition of new imports.
FW-647 #resolve
PR Close#28169
TestBed.compileComponents has always been an async API. However,
ViewEngine tolerated using this API in a synchronous manner if the
components declared in the testing module did not have any async
resources (templateUrl, styleUrls). This change makes the ivy TestBed
mirror this tolerance by configuring such components synchronously.
Ref: FW-992
PR Close#28350
This commit unifies handling of the "check no changes" mode between
ngIvy and the view engine. More specifically:
- check no changes can be invoked before change detection in ivy;
- `undefined` values are considered equal `NO_CHANGES` for the "check no changes"
mode purposes.
Chanes in this commit enables several tests that were previously running only in ivy
or only in the view engine.
PR Close#28366
Andrew Kushnir
Pawel Kozlowski
Kara Erickson
Olivier Combe
cexbrayat
Miško Hevery
Matias Niemelä
Jeremy Elbourn
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Marc Laval
Erick Xavier
onlyflix
jithil-kore
Benedikt Meurer
Paul Gschwendtner
George Kalpakas
Alex Rickabaugh