In View Engine, providers which neither used `useValue`, `useClass`,
`useFactory` or `useExisting`, were interpreted differently.
e.g.
```
{provide: X} -> {provide: X, useValue: undefined}, // this is how it works in View Engine
{provide: X} -> {provide: X, useClass: X}, // this is how it works in Ivy
```
The missing-injectable migration should migrate such providers to the
explicit `useValue` provider. This ensures that there is no unexpected
behavioral change when updating to v9.
PR Close#33709
We should not migrate the reference from `useExisting`. This is because
developers can only use the `useExisting` value as a token. e.g.
```ts
@NgModule({
providers: [
{provide: AppRippleConfig, useValue: rippleOptions},
{provide: MAT_RIPPLE_OPTIONS, useExisting: AppRippleConfig},
]
})
export class AppModule {}
```
In the case above, nothing should be decorated with `@Injectable`. The
`AppRippleConfig` class is just used as a token for injection.
PR Close#33286
Currenly the `missing-injectable` migration only migrates providers referenced from
`@NgModule` definitions. The schematic currently does not cover the migration for
providers referenced in `@Directive` or `@Component` definitions.
We need to handle the following keys for directives/components:
- `@Directive` -> `providers`
- `@Component` -> `providers` and `viewProviders`.
This commit ensures that the migration handles providers for these
definitions.
PR Close#33011
ec4381d explicitly set `enableIvy: false` for all migrations inside
the core package. This actually hides migration issues because the
migration itself should ensure that it instantiates the right
compiler program if it relies on `@angular/compiler-cli`.
We should remove these options from all migration tests to
ensure that we catch issues with migrations running in version
9 where Ivy is enabled by default.
e.g. e5636a322c
was accidentally hidden due to the `enableIvy: false` option.
PR Close#32954
Apparently the names of the bazel test targets in the schematics are
incorrect. This commit updates the target names to match their bazel
package name.
PR Close#32318
This commit switches the default value of the enableIvy flag to true.
Applications that run ngc will now by default receive an Ivy build!
This does not affect the way Bazel builds in the Angular repo work, since
those are still switched based on the value of the --define=compile flag.
Additionally, projects using @angular/bazel still use View Engine builds
by default.
Since most of the Angular repo tests are still written against View Engine
(particularly because we still publish VE packages to NPM), this switch
also requires lots of `enableIvy: false` flags in tsconfigs throughout the
repo.
Congrats to the team for reaching this milestone!
PR Close#32219
Initially the plan was to have a migration that adds `@Injectable()` to
all pipes in a CLI project so that the pipes can be injected in Ivy
similarly to how it worked in view engine.
Due to the planned refactorings which ensure that `@Directive`, `@Component`
and `@Pipe` also have a factory definition, this migration is no longer
needed for Ivy. Additionally since it is already disabled (due to
572b54967c) and we have a more generic
migration (known as `missing-injectable)` that could do the same as
`injectable-pipe`, we remove the migration from the code-base.
PR Close#32184
Moves the `renderer_to_renderer2` migration google3 tslint rule
into the new `google3` directory. This is done for consistency
as we recently moved all google3 migration rules into a new
`google3` folder (see: f69e4e6f77).
PR Close#31817
Creates a separate bazel target for the google3 migration
tests. The benefit is that it's faster to run tests for
public migrations in development. Google3 lint rules are
usually another story/implementation and the tests are quite
slow due to how TSLint applies replacements.
Additionally if something changes in the google3 tslint rules,
the tests which aren't affected re-run unnecessarily.
PR Close#31817
Moves all google3 migration tslint rules into a single directory.
This makes it easier to wire up multiple migration rules in
google3 without having to update the rule directories each time
a new migration is available.
PR Close#30956
Introduces a new migration schematic for adding the "@Injectable()"
decorator to provider classes which are currently not migrated. Previously
in ViewEngine, classes which are declared as providers sometimes don't
require the "@Injectable()" decorator
(e.g. https://stackblitz.com/edit/angular-hpo7gw)
With Ivy, provider classes need to be explicitly decorated with
the "@Injectable()" decorator if they are declared as providers
of a given module. This commit introduces a migration schematic
which automatically adds the explicit decorator to places where
the decorator is currently missing.
The migration logic is designed in a CLI devkit and TSlint agnostic
way so that we can also have this migration run as part of a public
CLI migration w/ `ng update`. This will be handled as part of a follow-up to reiterate on console output etc.
Resolves FW-1371
PR Close#30956
Adds a schematic and tslint rule that automatically migrate the consumer from `Renderer` to `Renderer2`. Supports:
* Renaming imports.
* Renaming property and method argument types.
* Casting to `Renderer`.
* Mapping all of the methods from the `Renderer` to `Renderer2`.
Note that some of the `Renderer` methods don't map cleanly between renderers. In these cases the migration adds a helper function at the bottom of the file which ensures that we generate valid code with the same return value as before. E.g. here's what the migration for `createText` looks like.
Before:
```
class SomeComponent {
createAndAddText() {
const node = this._renderer.createText(this._element.nativeElement, 'hello');
node.textContent += ' world';
}
}
```
After:
```
class SomeComponent {
createAndAddText() {
const node = __rendererCreateTextHelper(this._renderer, this._element.nativeElement, 'hello');
node.textContent += ' world';
}
}
function __rendererCreateTextHelper(renderer: any, parent: any, value: any) {
const node = renderer.createText(value);
if (parent) {
renderer.appendChild(parent, node);
}
return node;
}
```
This PR resolves FW-1344.
PR Close#30936
Currently the injectable pipe schematic generates invalid imports like `import import { Pipe, PipeTransform, Injectable } from '@angular/core'; from '@angular/core';`. The issue wasn't caught by the unit tests, because the invalid import still contains the valid one.
Fixes#30159.
PR Close#30170
Queries can technically be also accessed within component templates
e.g.
```html
<my-comp [binding]="myQuery"></my-comp>
```
In that case the query with the property "myQuery" is accessed
statically and needs to be marked with `static: true`. There are
other edge cases that need to be handled as the template property
read doesn't necessarily resolve to the actual query property.
For example:
```html
<foo #myQuery></foo>
<my-comp [binding]="myQuery"></my-comp>
```
In this scenario the binding doesn't refer to the actual query
because the template reference variable takes precedence. The
query doesn't need to be marked with "static: true" this time.
This commit ensures that the `static-query` migration schematic
now handles this cases properly. Also template property reads
that access queries from within a `<ng-template>` are ignored
as these can't access the query before the view has been initialized.
Resolves FW-1216
PR Close#29713
Introduces a new update schematic called "template-var-assignment"
that is responsible for analyzing template files in order to warn
developers if template variables are assigned to values.
The schematic also comes with a driver for `tslint` so that the
check can be used wtihin Google.
PR Close#29608
Fixes the incorrect failure message or the TSLint rule that
is used within Google. The TSLint rule is not part of the
public schematic code.
Additionally in order to make it easier to understand what
action the developer needs to take, we rather print out the
expected "static: true/false" statement instead of saying that
a query needs to be static or dynamic. Dynamic is ambiguous, as
there is no `dynamic: true` option.
PR Close#29320
Improves the failure message for the `explicit-query` timing TSLint rule
that is used within Google. Currently it's not very clear what action
developers need to take in order to resolve the lint failure manually.
PR Close#29258
In order to be able to use the static-query migration logic within
Google, we need to provide a TSLint rule entry-point that wires up
the schematic logic and provides reporting and automatic fixes.
PR Close#29258
Paul Gschwendtner
crisbeto
Alex Rickabaugh