This change should not have any impact on the code's behavior (based on
how the function is currently used), but it will avoid unnecessary work.
PR Close#34512
While different, CommonJS and UMD have a lot in common regarding the
their exports are constructed. Therefore, there was some code
duplication between `CommonJsReflectionHost` and `UmdReflectionHost`.
This commit extracts some of the common bits into a separate file as
helpers to allow reusing the code in both `ReflectionHost`s.
PR Close#34512
Previously, `UmdReflectionHost` would only recognize re-exports of the
form `__export(someIdentifier)` and not `__export(require('...'))`.
However, it is possible in some UMD variations to have the latter format
as well. See discussion in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34254/files#r359515373
This commit adds support for re-export of the form
`__export(require('...'))` in UMD.
PR Close#34512
This fix was part of a broader `ngtsc`/`ngcc` fix in 02bab8cf9 (see
there for details). In 02bab8cf9, the fix was only applied to
`CommonJsReflectionHost`, but it is equally applicable to
`UmdReflectionHost`. Later in #34254, the fix was partially ported to
`UmdReflectionHost` by fixing the `extractUmdReexports()` method.
This commit fully fixes `ngcc`'s handling of inline exports for code in
UMD format.
PR Close#34512
The `getProjectAsAttrValue` in `node_selector_matcher` finds the
ProjectAs marker and then additionally checks that the marker appears in
an even index of the node attributes because "attribute names are stored
at even indexes". This is true for "regular" attribute bindings but
classes, styles, bindings, templates, and i18n do not necessarily follow
this rule because there can be an uneven number of them, causing the
next "special" attribute "name" to appear at an odd index. To address
this issue, ensure ngProjectAs is placed right after "regular"
attributes.
PR Close#34617
Previously, some of the examples in the `lazy-loading-ngmodules` guide
were hard-coded.
This commit ensures all examples in the guide are extracted from
docregions in the corresponding example project.
PR Close#34599
Previously, if `UmdRenderingFormatter#addImports()` was called with an
empty list of imports to add (i.e. no new imports were needed), it would
add trailing commas in several locations (arrays, function arguments,
function parameters), thus making the code imcompatible with legacy
browsers such as IE11.
This commit fixes it by ensuring that no trailing commas are added if
`addImports()` is called with an empty list of imports.
This is a follow-up to #34353.
Fixes#34525
PR Close#34545
ngcc computes a dependency graph of entry-points to ensure that
entry-points are processed in the correct order. Previously only the imports
in source files were analysed to determine the dependencies for each
entry-point.
This is not sufficient when an entry-point has a "type-only" dependency
- for example only importing an interface from another entry-point.
In this case the "type-only" import does not appear in the
source code. It only appears in the typings files. This can cause a
dependency to be missed on the entry-point.
This commit fixes this by additionally processing the imports in the
typings program, as well as the source program.
Note that these missing dependencies could cause unexpected flakes when
running ngcc in async mode on multiple processes due to the way that
ngcc caches files when they are first read from disk.
Fixes#34411
// FW-1781
PR Close#34494
The `DependencyHost` implementations were duplicating the "postfix" strings
which are used to find matching paths when resolving module specifiers.
Now the hosts reuse the postfixes given to the `ModuleResolver` that is
passed to the host.
PR Close#34494
Rather than return a new object of dependency info from calls to
`collectDependencies()` we now pass in an object that will be updated
with the dependency info. This is in preparation of a change where
we will collect dependency information from more than one
`DependencyHost`.
Also to better fit with this approach the name is changed from
`findDependencies()` to `collectDependencies()`.
PR Close#34494
The main change here was to remove the updating instructions for
version 9 and instead point to update.angular.io. This ensures
we only have one "source of truth" for update instructions.
This commit also includes updates to error message text to
keep them up-to-date with live error messages (and thus keep
them searchable).
PR Close#34498
Prior to this commit, there were no `advance` instructions generated before `i18nExp` instructions and as a result, lifecycle hooks for components used inside i18n blocks were flushed too late. This commit adds the logic to generate `advance` instructions in front of `i18nExp` ones (similar to what we have in other places like interpolations, property bindings, etc), so that the necessary lifecycle hooks are flushed before expression value is captured.
PR Close#34436
The main logic of the `InheritDefinitionFeature` is to go through the prototype chain of a given Component and merge all Angular-specific information onto that Component def. The problem happens in case there is a Component in a hierarchy that also contains the `InheritDefinitionFeature` (i.e. it extends some other Component), so it inherits all Angular-specific information from its super class. As a result, the root Component may end up having duplicate information inherited from different Components in hierarchy.
Let's consider the following structure: `GrandChild` extends `Child` that extends `Base` and the `Base` class has a `HostListener`. In this scenario `GrandChild` and `Child` will have `InheritDefinitionFeature` included into the `features` list. The processing will happend in the following order:
- `Child` inherits `HostListener` from the `Base` class
- `GrandChild` inherits `HostListener` from the `Child` class
- since `Child` has a parent, `GrandChild` also inherits from the `Base` class
The result is that the `GrandChild` def has duplicated host listener, which is not correct.
This commit introduces additional logic that checks whether we came across a def that has `InheritDefinitionFeature` feature (which means that this def already inherited information from its super classes). If that's the case, we skip further fields-related inheritance logic, but keep going though the prototype chain to look for super classes that contain other features (like NgOnChanges), that we need to invoke for a given Component def.
PR Close#34244
Fixes an error that is thrown when a provider is overridden in `TestBed`, if the module definition of one of the imported modules uses a function for the `imports` that is set via `setNgModuleScope`. The problem was that we have a `for...of` loop that assumes that the imports are an array, but they can also be a function. This was handled correctly in other places, but this one was missed.
Note that the above-mentioned error is only thrown at runtime when the code is transpiled to es6. In es5 TS generates a call to a helper that handles the error silently so the attached unit test only fails in es6.
Fixes#34623.
PR Close#34629
Currently, the language service provides completions in a template node
attribute by first checking if the attribute contains template bindings
to provide completions for, and then providing completions for the
expression in the attribute.
In the latter case, the expression AST was being constructed
"synthetically" inside the language service, in particular declaring the
expression to be a `PropertyRead` with an implicit receiver.
Unfortunately, this AST can be incorrect if the expression is actually a
property read on a component property receiver (e.g. when reading
`key` in the expression `obj.key`, `obj` is the receiver).
The fix is pretty simple - rather than a synthetic construction of the
AST, ask the expression parser to parse the expression in the attribute.
Fixes https://github.com/angular/vscode-ng-language-service/issues/523
PR Close#34517
Previously, it was required that both `fullTemplateTypeCheck` and
`strictTemplates` had to be enabled for strict mode to be enabled. This
is strange, as `strictTemplates` implies `fullTemplateTypeCheck`. This
commit makes setting the `fullTemplateTypeCheck` flag optional so that
strict mode can be enabled by just setting `strictTemplates`.
PR Close#34195
It is now an error if '"fullTemplateTypeCheck"' is disabled while
`"strictTemplates"` is enabled, as enabling the latter implies that the
former is also enabled.
PR Close#34195
The compiler has a translation mechanism to convert from an Angular
`Type` to a `ts.TypeNode`, as appropriate. Prior to this change, it
would translate certain Angular expressions into their value equivalent
in TypeScript, instead of the correct type equivalent. This was possible
as the `ExpressionVisitor` interface is not strictly typed, with `any`s
being used for return values.
For example, a literal object was translated into a
`ts.ObjectLiteralExpression`, containing `ts.PropertyAssignment` nodes
as its entries. This has worked without issues as their printed
representation is identical, however it was incorrect from a semantic
point of view. Instead, a `ts.TypeLiteralNode` is created with
`ts.PropertySignature` as its members, which corresponds with the type
declaration of an object literal.
PR Close#34021
In Ivy's template type checker, type constructors are created for all
directive types to allow for accurate type inference to work. The type
checker has two strategies for dealing with such type constructors:
1. They can be emitted local to the type check block/type check file.
2. They can be emitted as static `ngTypeCtor` field into the directive
itself.
The first strategy is preferred, as it avoids having to update the
directive type which would cause a more expensive rebuild. However, this
strategy is not suitable for directives that have constrained generic
types, as those constraints would need to be present on the local type
constructor declaration. This is not trivial, as it requires that any
type references within a type parameter's constraint are imported into
the local context of the type check block.
For example, lets consider the `NgForOf` directive from '@angular/core'
looks as follows:
```typescript
import {NgIterable} from '@angular/core';
export class NgForOf<T, U extends NgIterable<T>> {}
```
The type constructor will then have the signature:
`(o: Pick<i1.NgForOf<T, U>, 'ngForOf'>) => i1.NgForOf<T, U>`
Notice how this refers to the type parameters `T` and `U`, so the type
constructor needs to be emitted into a scope where those types are
available, _and_ have the correct constraints.
Previously, the template type checker would detect the situation where a
type parameter is constrained, and would emit the type constructor
using strategy 2; within the directive type itself. This approach makes
any type references within the generic type constraints lexically
available:
```typescript
export class NgForOf<T, U extends NgIterable<T>> {
static ngTypeCtor<T = any, U extends NgIterable<T> = any>
(o: Pick<NgForOf<T, U>, 'ngForOf'>): NgForOf<T, U> { return null!; }
}
```
This commit introduces the ability to emit a type parameter with
constraints into a different context, under the condition that it can
be imported from an absolute module. This allows a generic type
constructor to be emitted into a type check block or type check file
according to strategy 1, as imports have been generated for all type
references within generic type constraints. For example:
```typescript
import * as i0 from '@angular/core';
import * as i1 from '@angular/common';
const _ctor1: <T = any, U extends i0.NgIterable<T> = any>
(o: Pick<i1.NgForOf<T, U>, 'ngForOf'>) => i1.NgForOf<T, U> = null!;
```
Notice how the generic type constraint of `U` has resulted in an import
of `@angular/core`, and the `NgIterable` is transformed into a qualified
name during the emitting process.
Resolves FW-1739
PR Close#34021
In the past, only the starting index of an expression Token has been
recorded, so a parser could demarkate the span of a token only by the
start locations of two tokens. This may lead to trailing whitespace
being included in the token span:
```html
{{ token1 + token2 }}
^^^^^^^^^ recorded span of `token1`
```
It's also not enough for a parser to determine the end of a token by
adding the length of the token value to the token's start location,
because lexed expression values may not exactly reflect the source code.
For example, `"d\\"e"` is lexed as a string token whose value is `d"e`.
Instead, this commit adds a `end` field to expression tokens. `end`
is one past the last index of the token source code. This will enable a
parser to determine the span of a token just by looking at that token.
This is a breaking change because the contructor interface of `Token`
has changed.
Part of #33477.
PR Close#33549
This commit fixes a bug in which we do testing for completions.
Subsequently, this exposes another bug in our implementation whereby
suggestions are not provided in "ngFor" where there should have been.
Currently, multiple test cases are grouped together in a single
template. This requires the template to be somewhat complete so that
test cases that depend on variables declared earlier would pass.
Consider the following example:
```
template: `
<div *ngFor="let ~{for-person}person of ~{for-people}people">
<span>Name: {{~{for-interp-person}person.~{for-interp-name}name}}</span>
<span>Age: {{person.~{for-interp-age}age}}</span>
</div>`,
```
In order to test `~{for-interp-person}`, `people` has to be included after
`~{for-people}`. This means the test case for `~{for-people}` is not
reflective of the actual use case because the variable is already there!
In real case, the expression would be incomplete, and our implementation
failed to take that into account.
This commit breaks such test into individual tests, and fix the bugs in
the underlying implementation.
PR Close#34473
Angular View Engine uses global knowledge to compile the following code:
```typescript
export class Base {
constructor(private vcr: ViewContainerRef) {}
}
@Directive({...})
export class Dir extends Base {
// constructor inherited from base
}
```
Here, `Dir` extends `Base` and inherits its constructor. To create a `Dir`
the arguments to this inherited constructor must be obtained via dependency
injection. View Engine is able to generate a correct factory for `Dir` to do
this because via metadata it knows the arguments of `Base`'s constructor,
even if `Base` is declared in a different library.
In Ivy, DI is entirely a runtime concept. Currently `Dir` is compiled with
an ngDirectiveDef field that delegates its factory to `getInheritedFactory`.
This looks for some kind of factory function on `Base`, which comes up
empty. This case looks identical to an inheritance chain with no
constructors, which works today in Ivy.
Both of these cases will now become an error in this commit. If a decorated
class inherits from an undecorated base class, a diagnostic is produced
informing the user of the need to either explicitly declare a constructor or
to decorate the base class.
PR Close#34460
Adds a compilation error if the consumer tries to pass in an undecorated class into the `providers` of an `NgModule`, or the `providers`/`viewProviders` arrays of a `Directive`/`Component`.
PR Close#34460
The function `makeTemplateDiagnostic` was accepting an error code of type
`number`, making it easy to accidentally pass an `ErrorCode` directly and
not convert it to an Angular diagnostic code first.
This commit refactors `makeTemplateDiagnostic` to accept `ErrorCode` up
front, and convert it internally. This is less error-prone.
PR Close#34460
Previously, ngtsc would perform scope analysis (which directives/pipes are
available inside a component's template) and template type-checking of that
template as separate steps. If a component's scope was somehow invalid (e.g.
its NgModule imported something which wasn't another NgModule), the
component was treated as not having a scope. This meant that during template
type-checking, errors would be produced for any invalid expressions/usage of
other components that should have been in the scope.
This commit changes ngtsc to skip template type-checking of a component if
its scope is erroneous (as opposed to not present in the first place). Thus,
users aren't overwhelmed with diagnostic errors for the template and are
only informed of the root cause of the problem: an invalid NgModule scope.
Fixes#33849
PR Close#34460
Previously each NgModule trait checked its own scope for valid declarations
during 'resolve'. This worked, but caused the LocalModuleScopeRegistry to
declare that NgModule scopes were valid even if they contained invalid
declarations.
This commit moves the generation of diagnostic errors to the
LocalModuleScopeRegistry where it belongs. Now the registry can consider an
NgModule's scope to be invalid if it contains invalid declarations.
PR Close#34460
The template type checker generates TypeScript expressions for any
expression that occurs in a template, so that TypeScript can check it
and produce errors. Some expressions as they occur in a template may be
translated into TypeScript code multiple times, for instance a binding
to a directive input that has a template guard.
One example would be the `NgIf` directive, which has a template guard to
narrow the type in the template as appropriate. Given the following
template:
```typescript
@Component({
template: '<div *ngIf="person">{{ person.name }}</div>'
})
class AppComponent {
person?: { name: string };
}
```
A type check block (TCB) with roughly the following structure is
created:
```typescript
function tcb(ctx: AppComponent) {
const t1 = NgIf.ngTypeCtor({ ngIf: ctx.person });
if (ctx.person) {
"" + ctx.person.name;
}
}
```
Notice how the `*ngIf="person"` binding is present twice: once in the
type constructor call and once in the `if` guard. As such, TypeScript
will check both instances and would produce duplicate errors, if any
were found.
Another instance is when the safe navigation operator is used, where an
expression such as `person?.name` is emitted into the TCB as
`person != null ? person!.name : undefined`. As can be seen, the
left-hand side expression `person` occurs twice in the TCB.
This commit adds the ability to insert markers into the TCB that
indicate that any errors within the expression should be ignored. This
is similar to `@ts-ignore`, however it can be applied more granularly.
PR Close#34417