Inside `*ngFor` the second run of the styling instructions can get into situation where it tries to read a value from a binding which has not yet executed. As a result the read is `NO_CHANGE` value and subsequent property read cause an exception as it is of wrong type.
Fix#35118
PR Close#35133
`TNode.directives` was introduced in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34938. Turns out that it is unnecessary because the information is already present it `TData` when combining with `TNode.directiveStart` and `TNode.directiveEnd`
Mainly this is true (conceptually):
```
expect(tNode.directives).toEqual(
tData.slice(
tNode.directivesStart,
tNode.directivesEnd - tNode.DirectivesStart -1
)
);
```
The refactoring removes `TNode.directives` and adds `TNode.directiveStyling` as we still need to keep location in the directive in `TNode`
PR Close#35050
These tests are used for perf testing and don't run as part of CI, as a result they bit-rotted. This fixes that. Long term these tests should be run as part of CI.
PR Close#35071
This change changes the priority order of static styling.
Current priority:
```
(least priority)
- Static
- Component
- Directives
- Template
- Dynamic Binding
- Component
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
The issue with the above priority is this use case:
```
<div style="color: red;" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
In the above case the directive will win and the resulting color will be `blue`. However a small change of adding interpolation to the example like so. (Style interpolation is coming in https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/34202)
```
<div style="color: red; width: {{exp}}px" directive-which-sets-color-blue>
```
Changes the priority from static binding to interpolated binding which means now the resulting color is `red`. It is very surprising that adding an unrelated interpolation and style can change the `color` which was not changed. To fix that we need to make sure that the static values are associated with priority of the source (directive or template) where they were declared. The new resulting priority is:
```
(least priority)
- Component
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Directives
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
- Template
- Static
- Map/Interpolation
- Property
(highest priority)
```
PR Close#34938
The current logic pulls multiproviders up to the parent module's
provider list. The result is that the multi provider being defined both in
the imported ModuleWithProviders and the parent and getting an extra
item in the multi provided array of values. This PR fixes that problem
by not pulling providers in ModuleWithProviders up to the parent module.
PR Close#34914
We had some logic for generating and passing in the `elIndex` parameter into the `hostBindings` function, but it wasn't actually being used for anything. The only place left that had a reference to it was the `StylingBuilder` and it only stored it without referencing it again.
PR Close#34969
Previously we would write to class/style as strings `element.className` and `element.style.cssText`. Turns out that approach is good for initial render but not good for updates. Updates using this approach are problematic because we have to check to see if there was an out of bound write to style and than perform reconciliation. This also requires the browser to bring up CSS parser which is expensive.
Another problem with old approach is that we had to queue the DOM writes and flush them twice. Once on element advance instruction and once in `hostBindings`. The double flushing is expensive but it also means that a directive can observe that styles are not yet written (they are written after directive executes.)
The new approach uses `element.classList.add/remove` and `element.style.setProperty/removeProperty` API for updates only (it continues to use `element.className` and `element.style.cssText` for initial render as it is cheaper.) The other change is that the styling changes are applied immediately (no queueing). This means that it is the instruction which computes priority. In some circumstances it may result in intermediate writes which are than overwritten with new value. (This should be rare)
Overall this change deletes most of the previous code and replaces it with new simplified implement. The simplification results in code savings.
PR Close#34804
This change introduces several functions for manipulating items in an array in an efficient (binary search) way.
- `arraySplice` a faster version of `Array.splice()`.
- `arrayInsert` a faster version of `Array.splice(index, 0, value)`.
- `arrayInsert2` a faster version of `Array.splice(index, 0, value1, value2)`.
- `arrayInsertSorted` a way to insert a value into sorted list.
- `arrayRemoveSorted` a way to remove a value from a sorted list.
- `arrayIndexOfSorted` a way to find a value in a sorted list.
- `ArrayMap` Efficient implementation of `Map` as an `Array`.
- `arrayMapSet`, `arrayMapGet`, `arrayMapIndexOf`, and `arrayMapDelete` for manipulating `ArrayMap`s.
PR Close#34804
NOTE: This change must be reverted with previous deletes so that it code remains in build-able state.
This change deletes old styling code and replaces it with a simplified styling algorithm.
The mental model for the new algorithm is:
- Create a linked list of styling bindings in the order of priority. All styling bindings ere executed in compiled order and than a linked list of bindings is created in priority order.
- Flush the style bindings at the end of `advance()` instruction. This implies that there are two flush events. One at the end of template `advance` instruction in the template. Second one at the end of `hostBindings` `advance` instruction when processing host bindings (if any).
- Each binding instructions effectively updates the string to represent the string at that location. Because most of the bindings are additive, this is a cheap strategy in most cases. In rare cases the strategy requires removing tokens from the styling up to this point. (We expect that to be rare case)S Because, the bindings are presorted in the order of priority, it is safe to resume the processing of the concatenated string from the last change binding.
PR Close#34616
NOTE: This change deletes code and creates a BROKEN SHA. If reverting this SHA needs to be reverted with the next SHA to get back into a valid state.
PR Close#34616
The `computeStaticStyling` will be used for computing static styling value during `firstCreatePass`.
The function takes into account static styling from the template as well as from the host bindings. The host bindings need to be merged in front of the template so that they have the correct priority.
PR Closes#34418
Parsing styling is now simplified to be used like so:
```
for (let i = parseStyle(text); i <= 0; i = parseStyleNext(text, i)) {
const key = getLastParsedKey();
const value = getLastParsedValue();
...
}
```
This change makes it easier to invoke the parser from other locations in the system without paying the cost of creating and iterating over `Map` of styles.
PR Closes#34418
This change moves information from instructions to declarative position:
- `ɵɵallocHostVars(vars)` => `DirectiveDef.hostVars`
- `ɵɵelementHostAttrs(attrs)` => `DirectiveDef.hostAttrs`
When merging directives it is necessary to know about `hostVars` and `hostAttrs`. Before this change the information was stored in the `hostBindings` function. This was problematic, because in order to get to the information the `hostBindings` would have to be executed. In order for `hostBindings` to be executed the directives would have to be instantiated. This means that the directive instantiation would happen before we had knowledge about the `hostAttrs` and as a result the directive could observe in the constructor that not all of the `hostAttrs` have been applied. This further complicates the runtime as we have to apply `hostAttrs` in parts over many invocations.
`ɵɵallocHostVars` was unnecessarily complicated because it would have to update the `LView` (and Blueprint) while existing directives are already executing. By moving it out of `hostBindings` function we can access it statically and we can create correct `LView` (and Blueprint) in a single pass.
This change only changes how the instructions are generated, but does not change the runtime much. (We cheat by emulating the old behavior by calling `ɵɵallocHostVars` and `ɵɵelementHostAttrs`) Subsequent change will refactor the runtime to take advantage of the static information.
PR Close#34683
This adds `insertTStyleValue` but does not hook it up to anything yet.
The purpose of this function is to create a linked-list of styling
related bindings. The bindings can be traversed during flush.
The linked list also keeps track of duplicates. This is important
for binding to know if it needs to check other styles for reconciliation.
PR Close#34004
This change introduces class/style reconciliation algorithm for DOM elements.
NOTE: The code is not yet hooked up, it will be used by future style algorithm.
Background:
Styling algorithm currently has [two paths](https://hackmd.io/@5zDGNGArSxiHhgvxRGrg-g/rycZk3N5S)
when computing how the style should be rendered.
1. A direct path which concatenates styling and uses `elemnent.className`/`element.style.cssText` and
2. A merge path which uses internal data structures and uses `element.classList.add/remove`/`element.style[property]`.
The situation is confusing and hard to follow/maintain. So a future PR will remove the merge-path and do everything with
direct-path. This however breaks when some other code adds class or style to the element without Angular's knowledge.
If this happens instead of switching from direct-path to merge-path algorithm, this change provides a different mental model
whereby we always do `direct-path` but the code which writes to the DOM detects the situation and reconciles the out of bound write.
The reconciliation process is as follows:
1. Detect that no one has modified `className`/`cssText` and if so just write directly (fast path).
2. If out of bounds write did occur, switch from writing using `className`/`cssText` to `element.classList.add/remove`/`element.style[property]`.
This does require that the write function computes the difference between the previous Angular expected state and current Angular state.
(This requires a parser. The advantage of having a parser is that we can support `style="width: {{exp}}px" kind of bindings.`)
Compute the diff and apply it in non destructive way using `element.classList.add/remove`/`element.style[property]`
Properties of approach:
- If no out of bounds style modification:
- Very fast code path: Just concatenate string in right order and write them to DOM.
- Class list order is preserved
- If out of bounds style modification detected:
- Penalty for parsing
- Switch to non destructive modification: `element.classList.add/remove`/`element.style[property]`
- Switch to alphabetical way of setting classes.
PR Close#34004
Fixes Ivy detecting changes inside child embedded views, even though they're detached.
Note that there's on subtlety here: I made the changes inside `refreshDynamicEmbeddedViews` rather than `refreshView`, because we support detecting changes on a detached view (evidenced by a couple of unit tests), but only if it's triggered directly from the view's `ChangeDetectorRef`, however we shouldn't be detecting changes in the detached child view when something happens in the parent.
Fixes#34816.
PR Close#34846
by DebugElement.triggerEventHandler. ZoneJS tracks the eventListeners on
a node but we need to be able to differentiate between those added by
Angular and those that were added outside the Angular context. This fix
aligns with the behavior that was present in View Engine (not calling
those listeners). If we decide later that we want to call those
listeners, we still need a way to differentiate between those that
we have wrapped in dom_renderer and those that were not (because they
were added outside the Angular context).
PR Close#34514
Fixes Ivy throwing an error when trying to access the `DebugNode.classes` of an SVG element. The problem is that the `className` of an SVG element is an `SVGAnimatedString`, rather than a plain string.
Fixes#34868.
PR Close#34872
This patch removes the need for the styleSanitizer() instruction in
favor of passing the sanitizer into directly into the styleProp
instruction.
This patch also increases the binding index size for all style/class bindings in preparation for #34418
PR Close#34480
In #28162 we introduced an extra `removeNode` call for host elements which can cause the parent element to be removed before all child animations have finished. The issue is only in Ivy, because that the only place where we pass in the `isHostElement` flag. These changes fix the issue by not re-triggering the removal logic if the element has in-progress animations.
Fixes#33597.
PR Close#34702
Before ivy it was possible to configure a mutable service value
in an application initializer (by providing an `APP_INITIALIZER`)
that could be read in the provider of `LOCALE_ID`. This is a common
scenario if you wanted to load the locale id asynchronously from
an HTTP request for instance.
When using the ivy, the runtime needs to be told what the current
locale is, which is done by calling the `setLocaleId()` function with
the value injected by the `LOCALE_ID` token. Previously this was
being done before the application initializers were run, which meant
that the `LOCALE_ID` provider was being executed before the
app initializers had a chance to get a new value for it.
Now this initalization of the locale for the ivy runtime is done after the
application initializers have been run.
Closes#34701
PR Close#34830
This brings in a few minor fixes including a better way to patch require for bootstrap scripts
Also remove install_source_map_support attribute from nodejs_binary targets This attribute will be removed from nodejs_binary in the future
PR Close#34736
The major one that affects the angular repo is the removal of the bootstrap attribute in nodejs_binary, nodejs_test and jasmine_node_test in favor of using templated_args --node_options=--require=/path/to/script. The side-effect of this is that the bootstrap script does not get the require.resolve patches with explicitly loading the targets _loader.js file.
PR Close#34736
Currently ngtsc looks for the first `ConstructorDeclaration` when figuring out what the parameters are so that it can generate the DI instructions. The problem is that if a constructor has overloads, it'll have several `ConstructorDeclaration` members with a different number of parameters. These changes tweak the logic so it looks for the constructor implementation.
PR Close#34590
DebugElement.query also matches elements that may have been created
outside of Angular (ex: with `document.appendChild`). If those matched
DebugElements are in turn used to query for more elements, an error
occurs because the first step in queryAll is to load the LContext.
PR Close#34687
Default currency code in CurrencyPipe is currently hardcoded to USD
and is not configurable. This commit allows the default currency code
to be configurable by adding a DEFAULT_CURRENCY_CODE injection token.
Example:
```
providers: [{ provide: DEFAULT_CURRENCY_CODE, useValue: "GBP" }]
...
{{ 123.45 | currency }} // outputs £123.45 as opposed to always $123.45 before
```
Closes: #25461
PR Close#32584
Unlike in View Engine, we currently reset the dirty state of
components in the check no changes change detection cycle.
This means that components cannot be marked as dirty from
view lifecycle hooks because the dirty state is reset and
the lifecycle hooks do not run in the check no changes CD cycle.
PR Close#34495
Miško Hevery
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Andrew Scott
Paul Gschwendtner
Matias Niemelä
Pete Bacon Darwin
Greg Magolan
Pawel Kozlowski
Hayouung
atscott