In Ivy, if you do:
`TestBed.configureTestingModule({providers: [{provide: Service}]});`
the injector will attempt to inject Service as if it was simply listed
in the providers array like `{providers: [Service]}`
This fixes an inconsistency when similarly providing an override with no
`useValue` or `useFactory`.
PR Close#33769
Prior to this commit, there was no check in R3TestBed to verify that metadata is resolved using a given Type. That leads to some cryptic error messages (when TestBed tries to compile a Type without having metadata) in case TestBed override functions receive unexpected Types (for example a Directive is used in `TestBed.overrideComponent` call). This commit adds the necessary checks to verify metadata presence before TestBed tries to (re)compile a Type.
PR Close#34204
NgModule compilation in JIT mode (that is also used in TestBed) caches module scopes on NgModule defs (using `transitiveCompileScopes` field). Module overrides (defined via TestBed.overrideModule) may invalidate this data by adding/removing items in `declarations` list. This commit forces TestBed to recalculate transitive scopes in case module overrides are present, so TestBed always gets the most up-to-date information.
PR Close#33787
While overriding providers in Ivy TestBed (via TestBed.overrideProvider call), the old providers were retained in the list, since the override takes precedence. However, presence of providers in the list might have side-effect: if a provider has the `ngOnDestroy` lifecycle hook, this hook will be registered and invoked later (when component is destroyed). This commit updates TestBed logic to clear provider list by removing the ones which have overrides.
PR Close#33706
This issue was found when debugging a test failure that was using lazy
loaded modules with the router. When doing this, the router calls
`NgModuleFactory.create` for the loaded module. This module gets a new
injector so the overrides provided in TestBed are not applied unless the
Injectable is in the providers list (which is not the case for
{providedIn...} Injectables).
PR Close#33606
Injector defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngInjectorDef to inj. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
PR Close#33151
Module defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngModuleDef to mod. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
PR Close#33142
Pipe defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngPipeDef to pipe. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
PR Close#33142
Factory defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngFactoryDef to fac. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
Note that the other "defs" (ngPipeDef, etc) will be
prefixed and shortened in follow-up PRs, in an attempt to
limit how large and conflict-y this change is.
PR Close#33116
Directive defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
ngDirectiveDef to dir. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
Note that the other "defs" (ngFactoryDef, etc) will be
prefixed and shortened in follow-up PRs, in an attempt to
limit how large and conflict-y this change is.
PR Close#33110
Component defs are not considered public API, so the property
that contains them should be prefixed with Angular's marker
for "private" ('ɵ') to discourage apps from relying on def
APIs directly.
This commit adds the prefix and shortens the name from
`ngComponentDef` to `cmp`. This is because property names
cannot be minified by Uglify without turning on property
mangling (which most apps have turned off) and are thus
size-sensitive.
Note that the other "defs" (ngDirectiveDef, etc) will be
prefixed and shortened in follow-up PRs, in an attempt to
limit how large and conflict-y this change is.
PR Close#33088
Currently Ivy stores the element attributes into an array above the component def and passes it into the relevant instructions, however the problem is that upon minification the array will get a unique name which won't compress very well. These changes move the attributes array into the component def and pass in the index into the instructions instead.
Before:
```
const _c0 = ['foo', 'bar'];
SomeComp.ngComponentDef = defineComponent({
template: function() {
element(0, 'div', _c0);
}
});
```
After:
```
SomeComp.ngComponentDef = defineComponent({
consts: [['foo', 'bar']],
template: function() {
element(0, 'div', 0);
}
});
```
A couple of cases that this PR doesn't handle:
* Template references are still in a separate array.
* i18n attributes are still in a separate array.
PR Close#32798
There are a couple scenarios that are problematic and need special
handling:
1. A user has a custom implementation of lazy-loaded modules, sets some
provider overrides, then compiles the module so it can be loaded. In a
follow-up test, the user sets different overrides for the module and
then compiles. This is problematic because we need to be sure the module
registered in the first test is not used, so we need to clear it out of
the modules list in `ng_module_factory_registration`.
2. A user has a similar lazy-loaded module factory implementation but
relies on the module being registered automatically. This can happen,
for example, as a side effect of importing the ngfactory file.
PR Close#32944
Reworks the compiler to output the factories for directives, components and pipes under a new static field called `ngFactoryFn`, instead of the usual `factory` property in their respective defs. This should eventually allow us to inject any kind of decorated class (e.g. a pipe).
**Note:** these changes are the first part of the refactor and they don't include injectables. I decided to leave injectables for a follow-up PR, because there's some more cases we need to handle when it comes to their factories. Furthermore, directives, components and pipes make up most of the compiler output tests that need to be refactored and it'll make follow-up PRs easier to review if the tests are cleaned up now.
This is part of the larger refactor for FW-1468.
PR Close#31953
Prior to this commit, it was impossible to override providers defined via ModuleWithProviders using TestBed.overrideProvider API. The problem was caused by the fact that we were not taking into account these providers while calculating accumulated set of provider overrides. This commit updates the logic to extract providers from ModuleWithProviders and calculate the final set of overrides taking them into account.
PR Close#31415
This is a new feature of the Ivy TestBed.
A common user pattern is to test one component with another. This is
commonly done by creating a `TestFixture` component which exercises the
main component under test.
This pattern is more difficult if the component under test is declared in an
NgModule but not exported. In this case, overriding the module is necessary.
In g3 (and View Engine), it's possible to use an NgSummary to override the
recompilation of a component, and depend on its AOT compiled factory. The
way this is implemented, however, specifying a summary for a module
effectively overrides much of the TestBed's other behavior. For example, the
following is legal:
```typescript
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
declarations: [FooCmp, TestFixture],
imports: [FooModule],
aotSummaries: [FooModuleNgSummary],
});
```
Here, `FooCmp` is declared in both the testing module and in the imported
`FooModule`. However, because the summary is provided, `FooCmp` is not
compiled within the context of the testing module, but _is_ made available
for `TestFixture` to use, even if it wasn't originally exported from
`FooModule`.
This pattern breaks in Ivy - because summaries are a no-op, this amounts
to a true double declaration of `FooCmp` which raises an error.
Fixing this in user code is possible, but is difficult to do in an
automated or backwards compatible way. An alternative solution is
implemented in this PR.
This PR attempts to capture the user intent of the following previously
unsupported configuration:
```typescript
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
declarations: [FooCmp, TestFixture],
imports: [FooModule],
});
```
Note that this is the same as the configuration above in Ivy, as the
`aotSummaries` value provided has no effect.
The user intent here is interpreted as follows:
1) `FooCmp` is a pre-existing component that's being used in the test
(via import of `FooModule`). It may or may not be exported by this
module.
2) `FooCmp` should be part of the testing module's scope. That is, it
should be visible to `TestFixture`. This is because it's listed in
`declarations`.
This feature effectively makes the `TestBed` testing module special. It's
able to declare components without compiling them, if they're already
compiled (or configured to be compiled) in the imports. And crucially, the
behavior matches the first example with the summary, making Ivy backwards
compatible with View Engine for tests that use summaries.
PR Close#30578
Prior to this change a component was considered unresolved (i.e. having dynamic resources that should be loaded, like external template or stylesheets) even if template override was provided as an empty string (for example, via TestBed.overrideTemplateUsingTestingModule call). This commit fixes the condition that previously treated empty string as an absent template value.
PR Close#30602
There is an encoding issue with using delta `Δ`, where the browser will attempt to detect the file encoding if the character set is not explicitly declared on a `<script/>` tag, and Chrome will find the `Δ` character and decide it is window-1252 encoding, which misinterprets the `Δ` character to be some other character that is not a valid JS identifier character
So back to the frog eyes we go.
```
__
/ɵɵ\
( -- ) - I am ineffable. I am forever.
_/ \_
/ \ / \
== == ==
```
PR Close#30546
Prior to this change, components created via TestBed.createComponent in the same test were placed into the same root context, which caused problems in conjunction with fixture.autoDetectChanges usage in the same test. Specifically, change detection was triggered immediately for created component (starting from the 2nd one) even if it was not required/desired. This commit makes Ivy and VE behavior consistent: now every component created via TestBed.createComponent is isolated from each other. Current solution uses host element id naming convention, which is not ideal, but helps avoid public API surface changes at this point (we might revisit this approach later).
Note: this commit also adds extra tests to verify bootstrap and change detection behavior in case of multiple components in `bootstrap` array in @NgModule, to make sure this behavior is aligned between Ivy and VE.
PR Close#29981
Overriding multi provider values (providers with `multi: true` flag) via TestBed require additional handling: all existing multi-provider values for the same token should be removed from the override list, so that they are not included into the final value of a given provider. This commit adds this logic to make sure we handle multi providers correctly.
PR Close#29919
In order to be backwards compatible with View Engine, Ivy should log
errors by default in the TestBed error handler rather than re-throwing
them. Re-throwing the errors is a breaking change that causes issues with
libraries like ngrx that have async behavior and custom error handling.
This logging approach has issues (for both VE and Ivy) because it can allow
tests to pass inappropriately if errors are thrown inside listeners. However,
since re-throwing would be breaking and requires a larger redesign, we should
wait until post-Ivy.
PR Close#29853
The `Δ` caused issue with other infrastructure, and we are temporarily
changing it to `ɵɵ`.
This commit also patches ts_api_guardian_test and AIO to understand `ɵɵ`.
PR Close#29850
When an @NgModule is imported more than once in the testing module (for
example it appears in the imports of more than one module, or if it's
literally listed multiple times), then TestBed had a bug where the
providers for the module would be overridden many times.
This alone was problematic but would not break tests. However, the original
value of the providers field of the ngInjectorDef was saved each time, and
restored in the same order. Thus, if the provider array was [X], and
overrides were applied twice, then the override array would become
[X, X'] and then [X, X', X, X']. However, on the second override the state
[X, X'] would be stored as original. The array would then be restored to
[X] and then [X, X'].
Each test, therefore, would continue to double the size of the providers
array for the module, eventually exhausting the browser's memory.
This commit adds a Set to track when overrides have been applied to a module
and refrain from applying them more than once.
PR Close#29571
Prior to this change, recompilation of AOT-compiled components in TestBed may fail when template override is requested. That was happening due to the `styleUrls` field defined for a Component, thus switching its state to "requires resolution" (i.e. having external resources) at compile time. This change avoids this issue by storing styles and resetting `styleUrls` field before recompilation. Once compilation is done, saved styles are patched back onto Component def.
PR Close#29555
Prior to this change, Ivy version of TestBed was not designed to support the logic to avoid recompilations - most of the Components/Directives/Pipes were recompiled for each test, even if there were no overrides defined for a given Type. Additional checks to avoid recompilation were introduced in one of the previous commits (0244a2433e), but there were still some corner cases that required attention. In order to support the necessary logic better, Ivy TestBed was rewritten/refactored. Main results of this rewrite are:
* no recompilation for Components/Directives/Pipes without overrides
* the logic to restore state between tests (isolate tests) was improved
* transitive scopes calculation no longer performs recompilation (it works with compiled defs)
As a result of these changes we see reduction in memory consumption (3.5-4x improvement) and pefromance increase (4-4.5x improvement).
PR Close#29483
Prior to this change, we always recompile all Components/Directives/Pipes even if they were AOT-compiled and had no overrides. This is causing problems in case we try to recompile a Component with "templateUrl" or "styleUrls" (which were already resolved in case of AOT) and generally this unnecessary work that TestBed was doing is not required. This commit adds extra logic to check whether a Component/Directive/Pipe already have compiled NG def (like ngComponentDef) and whether there are no overrides present - in this case recompilation is skipped. Recompilation is also skipped in case a Component/Directive has only Provider overrides - in this situation providers resolver function is patched to reflect overrides. Provider overrides are very common in g3, thus this code path ensures no full recompilation.
PR Close#29294
Ivy allows Components to extend Directives (but not the other way around) and as a result we may have Component and Directive annotations present at the same time. The logic that resolves annotations to pick the necessary one didn't take this into account and as a result Components were recognized as Directives (and vice versa) in case of inheritance. This change updates the resolution logic by picking known annotation that is the nearest one (in inheritance tree) and compares it with expected type. That should help avoid mis-classification of Components/Directives during resolution.
PR Close#28439
TestBed.compileComponents has always been an async API. However,
ViewEngine tolerated using this API in a synchronous manner if the
components declared in the testing module did not have any async
resources (templateUrl, styleUrls). This change makes the ivy TestBed
mirror this tolerance by configuring such components synchronously.
Ref: FW-992
PR Close#28350
DebugElement.properties should contain a map of element
property names to element property values, with entries
for both normal property bindings and host bindings.
This commit adds support for property bindings in
DebugElement.properties (including interpolations).
PR Close#28355
DebugElement.properties should contain a map of element
property names to element property values, with entries
for both normal property bindings and host bindings.
Many Angular core tests depend on this map being present.
This commit adds support for host property bindings in
DebugElement.properties, which fixes the Angular core tests.
There is still work to be done for normal property bindings.
PR Close#28355
When we look for matching annotations in TestBed, we should always take the last
matching annotation. Otherwise, we will return superclass data for subclasses,
which would have unintended consequences like directives matching the wrong selectors.
PR Close#28195
`R3TestBed` allows consumers to configure a "testing module", declare components, override various metadata, etc. To do this, it implements its own JIT compilation, where components/directives/modules have Ivy definition fields generated based on testing metadata. It results in tests interfering with each other. One test might override something in a component that another test tries to use normally, causing failures.
In order to resolve this problem, we store current components/directives/modules defs before applying overrides and re-compiling. Once the test is complete, we restore initial defs, so the next tests interact with "clean" components.
PR Close#27786
Andrew Scott
Andrew Kushnir
Miško Hevery
Kara Erickson
crisbeto
Carlos Ortiz García
Alex Rickabaugh
Ben Lesh
Jeremy Elbourn
Pawel Kozlowski
Victor Berchet