Content projection is an important part of Angular. However, it has
never been documented in the Angular documentation set. This topic
attempts to provide the basics of content projection for developers. It
is not a comprehensive guide; rather, it is a starting point that we
can hopefully expand upon in the future.
PR Close#41143
Currently when the change is made to the code inside the `packages/common/http` folder, both `fw-http` and `fw-common` group members are assigned for review. However only `fw-http` is required and should be sufficient. This commit updates the PullApprove config to exclude `packages/common/http` path from the list of folders that `fw-common` "owns".
PR Close#41887
Historically all .bazel files were owned by dev-infra to assist in ensuring that
consistency was maintained in how rules were being used. As this now has reached
a point of maturity in the repository where the check is mostly a rubber stamping,
this requirement can be removed. Notably this is different than the requirement
of dev-infra approval for .bzl files as these contain the implementation of macros
rather than just the usage.
PR Close#41382
After being OOO for a while, I have been denoted as OOO in the pullapprove
configuration (by commenting out the username in the reviewer lists).
See 3ba97ab391.
This re-activates `devversion` in the pullapprove configuration.
PR Close#41352
Our approach for handling cyclic imports results in code that is
not easy to tree-shake, so it is not suitable for publishing in a
library.
When compiling in partial compilation mode, we are targeting
such library publication, so we now create a fatal diagnostic
error instead of trying to handle the cyclic import situation.
Closes#40678
PR Close#40782
Much like the compiler-cli, the language-service package has internal testing
tools that are not intended for external use and do not need fw-testing review.
See #40679.
PR Close#40795
Much like the compiler-cli, the language-service package has internal testing
tools that are not intended for external use and do not need fw-testing review.
See #40679.
PR Close#40787
This commit adds a new `docs-contributors` group (with Emma and Minko as members) which will be used as reviewers
for PRs that update the list of contributors.
PR Close#40368
This reverts commit c88e8141abb411bd955e29f2670b9e2c204cce1a.
This reverts the revert that undid the doing of the pull approve
approval.
PR Close#40059
This reverts commit 9f8ccd577f481a3ca4508287ec06cdf863561f69. The
PullApprove labeling is unfortunately removing labels rather than
adding them.
PR Close#40053
The fw-testing group should only match on testing directories within the
framework packages, previously it was also matching in other areas of
the codebase.
PR Close#39536
Alowing for disabling PullApprove on a single PR via adding a label allows
for an escape hatch if PullApprove is not acting as expected, or for cases
where reviews can be stepped over in obvious situations, such as a revert.
PR Close#39430
Pete Bacon Darwin
Alan Agius
David Shevitz
Joey Perrott
mgechev
Kapunahele Wong
Andrew Kushnir
Zach Arend
George Kalpakas
Paul Gschwendtner
Andrew Scott
Jeremy Elbourn
hafiz
twerske
Jessica Janiuk