on our CI server we currently split each build into the building phase and testing phase, this change aligns test.unit.tools/ci
with the rest of ci test taskswq
components:
- gulp test.unit.broccoli task
- mock-fs for mocking our FS in unit tests
- jasmine d.ts file for type checking
jasmine lib is provided by minijasmine2 so we don't need to include it explicitly
This change solves several problems:
- the broccoli pipeline is used to compile the node/cjs tree upon any change to the modules/ directory
- jasmine tests run in a new process removing the need to clean up environment after each test
- since we transpile only those test files that are actually needed for node/cjs build, we transpile less and don't need to filter out tests
AppViewManager is the single entry point to changing the view hierarchy.
It is split between the manager itself which does coordination and
helper methods, so both are easily testable in isolation.
Also, ViewContainer is now only a pure reference to a bound element
with the previous functionality but does not contain the list of views
any more.
Part of #1477
We have Dart code in `angular2` module that ought to be in its own
package. Examples include Dart analysis plugins, and potentially the
transformers (although transformers cannot be moved out just yet).
However, this code is Dart-only and it doesn’t make sense to use JS
directory layout for it. This commit introduces a sub-directory called
`modules_dart`. All modules in this directory are pure Dart packages
using standard pub directory layout. The code in these packages never
gets transpiled. It is directly copied to `dist` unmodified, except an
adjustment in relative paths in `pubspec.yaml` files.
When the mean is 0, the coefficient of variation is calculated to be
NaN, which is not meaningful, so instead of printing "+-NaN%", just
don't print the CV at all.
Closes#908Closes#1444
I didn't get a full trace back for my evidence I got from making this example work. EventEmitter was instantiated and assigned to wrong property. Also the mapping should be done using the component property name as it will be obtained via accessor and exposed on the directive (as far as I understood).