Now Angular doesn't support add event listeners as passive very easily.
User needs to use `elem.addEventListener('scroll', listener, {passive: true});`
or implements their own EventManagerPlugin to do that.
Angular may finally support new template syntax to support passive event, for now,
this commit introduces a temp solution to allow user to define the passive event names
in zone.js configurations.
User can define a global varibale like this.
```
(window as any)['__zone_symbol__PASSIVE_EVENTS'] = ['scroll'];
```
to let all `scroll` event listeners passive.
PR Close#34503
* it's tricky to get out of the runfiles tree with `bazel test` as `BUILD_WORKSPACE_DIRECTORY` is not set but I employed a trick to read the `DO_NOT_BUILD_HERE` file that is one level up from `execroot` and that contains the workspace directory. This is experimental and if `bazel test //:test.debug` fails than `bazel run` is still guaranteed to work as `BUILD_WORKSPACE_DIRECTORY` will be set in that context
* test //integration:bazel_test and //integration:bazel-schematics_test exclusively
* run "exclusive" and "manual" bazel-in-bazel integration tests in their own CI job as they take 8m+ to execute
```
//integration:bazel-schematics_test PASSED in 317.2s
//integration:bazel_test PASSED in 167.8s
```
* Skip all integration tests that are now handled by angular_integration_test except the tests that are tracked for payload size; these are:
- cli-hello-world*
- hello_world__closure
* add & pin @babel deps as newer versions of babel break //packages/localize/src/tools/test:test
@babel/core dep had to be pinned to 7.6.4 or else //packages/localize/src/tools/test:test failed. Also //packages/localize uses @babel/generator, @babel/template, @babel/traverse & @babel/types so these deps were added to package.json as they were not being hoisted anymore from @babel/core transitive.
NB: integration/hello_world__systemjs_umd test must run with systemjs 0.20.0
NB: systemjs must be at 0.18.10 for legacy saucelabs job to pass
NB: With Bazel 2.0, the glob for the files to test `"integration/bazel/**"` is empty if integation/bazel is in .bazelignore. This glob worked under these conditions with 1.1.0. I did not bother testing with 1.2.x as not having integration/bazel in .bazelignore is correct.
PR Close#33927
This brings in a few minor fixes including a better way to patch require for bootstrap scripts
Also remove install_source_map_support attribute from nodejs_binary targets This attribute will be removed from nodejs_binary in the future
PR Close#34736
The major one that affects the angular repo is the removal of the bootstrap attribute in nodejs_binary, nodejs_test and jasmine_node_test in favor of using templated_args --node_options=--require=/path/to/script. The side-effect of this is that the bootstrap script does not get the require.resolve patches with explicitly loading the targets _loader.js file.
PR Close#34736
The major one that affects the angular repo is the removal of the bootstrap attribute in nodejs_binary, nodejs_test and jasmine_node_test in favor of using templated_args --node_options=--require=/path/to/script. The side-effect of this is that the bootstrap script does not get the require.resolve patches with explicitly loading the targets _loader.js file.
PR Close#34589
Currently we only run Saucelabs on PRs using the legacy View Engine
build. Switching that build to Ivy is not trivial and there are various
options:
1. Updating the R3 switches to use POST_R3 by default. At first glance,
this doesn't look easy because the current ngtsc switch logic seems to
be unidirectional (only PRE_R3 to POST_R3).
2. Updating the legacy setup to run with Ivy. This sounds like the easiest
solution at first.. but it turns out to be way more complicated. Packages
would need to be built with ngtsc using legacy tools (i.e. first building
the compiler-cli; and then building packages) and View Engine only tests
would need to be determined and filtered out. Basically it will result in
re-auditing all test targets. This is contradictory to the fact that we have
this information in Bazel already.
3. Creating a new job that runs tests on Saucelabs with Bazel. We specify
fine-grained test targets that should run. This would be a good start
(e.g. acceptance tests) and also would mean that we do not continue maintaining
the legacy setup..
This commit implements the third option as it allows us to move forward
with the general Bazel migration. We don't want to spend too much time
on our legacy setup since it will be removed anyway in the future.
PR Close#34277
The earlier update to nodejs rules 0.40.0 fixes the cross-platform RBE issues with nodejs_binary. This commit adds a work-around for rules_webtesting cross-platform RBE issues.
PR Close#33708
These were getting included in the @angular/localize package.
Instead, patch the upstream files to work with TS typeRoots option
See bazelbuild/rules_nodejs#1033
PR Close#33226
These were getting included in the @angular/localize package.
Instead, patch the upstream files to work with TS typeRoots option
See bazelbuild/rules_nodejs#1033
PR Close#33176
This PR updates Angular to compile with TypeScript 3.6 while retaining
compatibility with TS3.5. We achieve this by inserting several `as any`
casts for compatiblity around `ts.CompilerHost` APIs.
PR Close#32908
This release includes a ts_config runfiles fix so also cleaning up the one line work-around from #31943.
This also updates to upstream rules_webtesting browser repositories load("@io_bazel_rules_webtesting//web/versioned:browsers-0.3.2.bzl", "browser_repositories") to fix a breaking change in the chromedriver distro. This bumps up the version of chromium to the version here: https://github.com/bazelbuild/rules_webtesting/blob/master/web/versioned/browsers-0.3.2.bzl
PR Close#32151
`simple-server.js` is vulnerable to a trivial path traversal attack, i.e. an
attacker can supply a path like `../../etc/passwd` to read arbitrary files on
the server. This change fixes the issue by properly resolving the path, and then
only serving files under the current directory (as intended).
This is not really a security issue, given the code is not part of Angular, but
rather just testing infrastructure for Angular itself, and the CI servers are
not expected to contain confidential information, but still worth fixing for
code hygiene.
PR Close#32392