Historically we have had a pullapprove group `fallback` which acted as
a catch all for files which did not match any other groups. This
group assigned reviews to IgorMinar, however it was not apparent that
this group was assigned. This change removes this assignment. This
group as active should always coincide with failures of the pullapprove
verification script. We continue to have this group as a secondary test
ensuring all files in the repo are captured by the pullapprove config.
PR Close#36456
Currently, when verifying our pullapprove configuration, we don't
respect modifications to the set of files in a condition.
e.g. It's not possible to do the following:
```
contains_any_globs(files.exclude(...), [
```
This prevents us from having codeowner groups which match a directory,
but want to filter out specific sub directories. For example, `fw-core`
matches all files in the core package. We want to exclude the schematics
from that glob. Usually we do this by another exclude condition.
This has a *significant* downside though. It means that fw-core will not
be requested if a PR changes schematic code, _and_ actual fw-core code.
To support these conditions, the pullapprove verification tool is
refactored, so that it no longer uses Regular expressions for parsing,
but rather evaluates the code through a dynamic function. This is
possible since the conditions are written in simple Python that can
be run in NodeJS too (with small modifications/transformations).
PR Close#36661
Pullapprove as added a few new features to allow for us to better
execute our expectation for global approvals. We need to allow for
an expectation that our global approver groups are not in the list
of approved groups. Additionally, since approval groups apply to
all files in the repo, the global approval groups also do not have
conditions defined for them, which means pullapprove verification
need to allow for no conditions need to be defined.
PR Close#36324
Joey Perrott
Paul Gschwendtner