6ddfff5cd5
This is a big change. @matsko also deserves much of the credit for the implementation.
Previously, `ComponentInstruction`s held all the state for async components.
Now, we introduce several subclasses for `Instruction` to describe each type of navigation.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Redirects now use the Link DSL syntax. Before:
```
@RouteConfig([
{ path: '/foo', redirectTo: '/bar' },
{ path: '/bar', component: BarCmp }
])
```
After:
```
@RouteConfig([
{ path: '/foo', redirectTo: ['Bar'] },
{ path: '/bar', component: BarCmp, name: 'Bar' }
])
```
BREAKING CHANGE:
This also introduces `useAsDefault` in the RouteConfig, which makes cases like lazy-loading
and encapsulating large routes with sub-routes easier.
Previously, you could use `redirectTo` like this to expand a URL like `/tab` to `/tab/posts`:
@RouteConfig([
{ path: '/tab', redirectTo: '/tab/users' }
{ path: '/tab', component: TabsCmp, name: 'Tab' }
])
AppCmp { ... }
Now the recommended way to handle this is case is to use `useAsDefault` like so:
```
@RouteConfig([
{ path: '/tab', component: TabsCmp, name: 'Tab' }
])
AppCmp { ... }
@RouteConfig([
{ path: '/posts', component: PostsCmp, useAsDefault: true, name: 'Posts' },
{ path: '/users', component: UsersCmp, name: 'Users' }
])
TabsCmp { ... }
```
In the above example, you can write just `['/Tab']` and the route `Users` is automatically selected as a child route.
Closes #4728
Closes #4228
Closes #4170
Closes #4490
Closes #4694
Closes #5200
Closes #5475
9 lines
459 B
Markdown
9 lines
459 B
Markdown
# Router integration tests
|
|
|
|
These tests only mock out `Location`, and otherwise use all the real parts of routing to ensure that
|
|
various routing scenarios work as expected.
|
|
|
|
The Component Router in Angular 2 exposes only a handful of different options, but because they can
|
|
be combined and nested in so many ways, it's difficult to rigorously test all the cases.
|
|
|
|
The address this problem, we introduce `describeRouter`, `describeWith`, and `describeWithout`. |