335854f6bc
Currently the `missing-injectable` migration seems to add `@Injectable()` to third-party classes in type definitions. This not an issue in general since we do not generate broken code by inserting a decorator into a type definition file. Though, we can avoid adding the decorator since it won't have any effect and in general we should not write to non source files of the compilation unit. PR Close #33286 |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| dynamic-queries | ||
| google3 | ||
| missing-injectable | ||
| module-with-providers | ||
| move-document | ||
| postinstall-ngcc | ||
| renderer-to-renderer2 | ||
| static-queries | ||
| template-var-assignment | ||
| undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields | ||
| undecorated-classes-with-di | ||