angular-cn/packages/core/schematics/migrations/missing-injectable
Paul Gschwendtner 335854f6bc fix(core): missing-injectable migration should not update type definitions (#33286)
Currently the `missing-injectable` migration seems to add
`@Injectable()` to third-party classes in type definitions.

This not an issue in general since we do not generate broken code
by inserting a decorator into a type definition file. Though, we can
avoid adding the decorator since it won't have any effect and in
general we should not write to non source files of the compilation unit.

PR Close #33286
2019-10-25 13:26:00 -07:00
..
google3 refactor(core): missing-injectable migration should respect providers of directives and components (#33011) 2019-10-14 20:24:01 +00:00
BUILD.bazel fix(core): missing-injectable migration should handle forwardRef (#33286) 2019-10-25 13:26:00 -07:00
definition_collector.ts refactor(core): missing-injectable migration should respect providers of directives and components (#33011) 2019-10-14 20:24:01 +00:00
import_manager.ts feat(ivy): introduce missing-injectable migration for google3 (#30956) 2019-07-23 15:52:40 -07:00
index.ts docs(core): add migration guide links to schematics (#33258) 2019-10-18 18:18:37 -04:00
transform.ts fix(core): missing-injectable migration should not update type definitions (#33286) 2019-10-25 13:26:00 -07:00
update_recorder.ts refactor(core): missing-injectable migration should respect providers of directives and components (#33011) 2019-10-14 20:24:01 +00:00