139 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.2 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			139 lines
		
	
	
		
			7.2 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Overview - Security model
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| Whenever a PR job is run on Travis, we want to build `angular.io` and upload the build artifacts to
 | |
| a publicly accessible server so that collaborators (developers, designers, authors, etc) can preview
 | |
| the changes without having to checkout and build the app locally.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This document discusses the security considerations associated with uploading build artifacts as
 | |
| part of the CI setup and serving them publicly.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Security objectives
 | |
| 
 | |
| - **Prevent uploading arbitrary content to our servers.**
 | |
|   Since there is no restriction on who can submit a PR, we cannot allow any PR's build artifacts to
 | |
|   be uploaded.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - **Prevent overwriting other peoples uploaded content.**
 | |
|   There needs to be a mechanism in place to ensure that the uploaded content does indeed correspond
 | |
|   to the PR indicated by its URL.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - **Prevent arbitrary access on the server.**
 | |
|   Since the PR author has full access over the build artifacts that would be uploaded, we must
 | |
|   ensure that the uploaded files will not enable arbitrary access to the server or expose sensitive
 | |
|   info.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Issues / Caveats
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Because the PR author can change the scripts run on CI, any security mechanisms must be immune to
 | |
|   such changes.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - For security reasons, encrypted Travis variables are not available to PRs, so we can't rely on
 | |
|   them to implement security.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Implemented approach
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### In a nutshell
 | |
| The implemented approach can be broken up to the following sub-tasks:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. Verify which PR the uploaded artifacts correspond to.
 | |
| 2. Fetch the PR's metadata, including author and labels.
 | |
| 3. Check whether the PR can be automatically verified as "trusted" (based on its author or labels).
 | |
| 4. If necessary, update the corresponding PR's verification status.
 | |
| 5. Deploy the artifacts to the corresponding PR's directory.
 | |
| 6. Prevent overwriting previously deployed artifacts (which ensures that the guarantees established
 | |
|    during deployment will remain valid until the artifacts are removed).
 | |
| 7. Prevent uploaded files from accessing anything outside their directory.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Implementation details
 | |
| This section describes how each of the aforementioned sub-tasks is accomplished:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. **Verify which PR the uploaded artifacts correspond to.**
 | |
| 
 | |
|    We are taking advantage of Travis' [JWT addon](https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/jwt). By sharing
 | |
|    a secret between Travis (which keeps it private but uses it to sign a JWT) and the server (which
 | |
|    uses it to verify the authenticity of the JWT), we can accomplish the following:
 | |
|    a. Verify that the upload request comes from Travis.
 | |
|    b. Determine the PR that these artifacts correspond to (since Travis puts that information into
 | |
|       the JWT, without the PR author being able to modify it).
 | |
| 
 | |
|    _Note:_
 | |
|    _There are currently certain limitation in the implementation of the JWT addon._
 | |
|    _See the next section for more details._
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. **Fetch the PR's metadata, including author and labels**.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Once we have securely associated the uploaded artifacts to a PR, we retrieve the PR's metadata -
 | |
|    including the author's username and the labels - using the
 | |
|    [GitHub API](https://developer.github.com/v3/).
 | |
|    To avoid rate-limit restrictions, we use a Personal Access Token (issued by
 | |
|    [@mary-poppins](https://github.com/mary-poppins)).
 | |
| 
 | |
| 3. **Check whether the PR can be automatically verified as "trusted"**.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    "Trusted" means that we are confident that the build artifacts are suitable for being deployed
 | |
|    and publicly accessible on the preview server. There are two ways to check that:
 | |
|    1. We can verify that the PR has a pre-determined label, which marks it as "safe for preview".
 | |
|       Such a label can only have been added by a maintainer (with the necessary rights) and
 | |
|       designates that they have manually verified the PR contents.
 | |
|    2. We can verify (again using the GitHub API) the author's membership in one of the
 | |
|       whitelisted/trusted GitHub teams. For this operation, we need a Personal Access Token with the
 | |
|       `read:org` scope issued by a user that can "see" the specified GitHub organization.
 | |
|       Here too, we use the token by @mary-poppins.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 4. **If necessary update the corresponding PR's verification status**.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Once we have determined whether the PR is considered "trusted", we update its "visibility" (i.e.
 | |
|    whether it is publicly accessible or not), based on the new verification status. For example, if
 | |
|    a PR was initially considered "not trusted" but the check triggered by a new build determined
 | |
|    otherwise, the PR (and all the previously uploaded previews) are made public. It works the same
 | |
|    way if a PR has gone from "trusted" to "not trusted".
 | |
| 
 | |
| 5. **Deploy the artifacts to the corresponding PR's directory.**
 | |
| 
 | |
|    With the preceding steps, we have verified that the uploaded artifacts have been uploaded by
 | |
|    Travis. Additionally, we have determined whether the PR can be trusted to have its previews
 | |
|    publicly accessible or whether further verification is necessary. The artifacts will be stored to
 | |
|    the PR's directory, but will not be publicly accessible unless the PR has been verified.
 | |
|    Essentially, as long as sub-tasks 1, 2 and 3 can be securely accomplished, it is possible to
 | |
|    "project" the trust we have in a team's members through the PR and Travis to the build artifacts.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 6. **Prevent overwriting previously deployed artifacts**.
 | |
| 
 | |
|    In order to enforce this restriction (and ensure that the deployed artifacts' validity is
 | |
|    preserved throughout their "lifetime"), the server that handles the upload (currently a Node.js
 | |
|    Express server) rejects uploads that target an existing directory.
 | |
|    _Note: A PR can contain multiple uploads; one for each SHA that was built on Travis._
 | |
| 
 | |
| 7. **Prevent uploaded files from accessing anything outside their directory.**
 | |
| 
 | |
|    Nginx (which is used to serve the uploaded artifacts) has been configured to not follow symlinks
 | |
|    outside of the directory where the build artifacts are stored.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Assumptions / Things to keep in mind
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Each trusted PR author has full control over the content that is uploaded for their PRs. Part of
 | |
|   the security model relies on the trustworthiness of these authors.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Adding the specified label on a PR and marking it as trusted, gives the author full control over
 | |
|   the content that is uploaded for the specific PR (e.g. by pushing more commits to it). The user
 | |
|   adding the label is responsible for ensuring that this control is not abused and that the PR is
 | |
|   either closed (one way of another) or the access is revoked.
 | |
| 
 | |
| - If anyone gets access to the `PREVIEW_DEPLOYMENT_TOKEN` (a.k.a. `NGBUILDS_IO_KEY` on
 | |
|   angular/angular) variable generated for each Travis job, they will be able to impersonate the
 | |
|   corresponding PR's author on the preview server for as long as the token is valid (currently 90
 | |
|   mins). Because of this, the value of the `PREVIEW_DEPLOYMENT_TOKEN` should not be made publicly
 | |
|   accessible (e.g. by printing it on the Travis job log).
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Travis does only allow specific whitelisted property names to be used with the JWT addon. The only
 | |
|   known such property at the time is `SAUCE_ACCESS_KEY` (used for integration with SauceLabs). In
 | |
|   order to be able to actually use the JWT addon we had to name the encrypted variable
 | |
|   `SAUCE_ACCESS_KEY` (which we later re-assign to `NGBUILDS_IO_KEY`).
 |