359 lines
		
	
	
		
			17 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			359 lines
		
	
	
		
			17 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Upgrading for performance
 | |
| 
 | |
| <div class="alert is-helpful">
 | |
| 
 | |
|   _Angular_ is the name for the Angular of today and tomorrow.<br />
 | |
|   _AngularJS_ is the name for all 1.x versions of Angular.
 | |
| 
 | |
| </div>
 | |
| 
 | |
| This guide describes some of the built-in tools for efficiently migrating AngularJS projects over to
 | |
| the Angular platform, one piece at a time. It is very similar to
 | |
| [Upgrading from AngularJS](guide/upgrade) with the exception that this one uses the {@link
 | |
| downgradeModule downgradeModule()} helper function instead of the {@link UpgradeModule
 | |
| UpgradeModule} class. This affects how the app is bootstrapped and how change detection is
 | |
| propagated between the two frameworks. It allows you to upgrade incrementally while improving the
 | |
| speed of your hybrid apps and leveraging the latest of Angular in AngularJS apps early in the
 | |
| process of upgrading.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Preparation
 | |
| 
 | |
| Before discussing how you can use `downgradeModule()` to create hybrid apps, there are things that
 | |
| you can do to ease the upgrade process even before you begin upgrading. Because the steps are the
 | |
| same regardless of how you upgrade, refer to the [Preparation](guide/upgrade#preparation) section of
 | |
| [Upgrading from AngularJS](guide/upgrade).
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Upgrading with `ngUpgrade`
 | |
| 
 | |
| With the `ngUpgrade` library in Angular you can upgrade an existing AngularJS app incrementally by
 | |
| building a hybrid app where you can run both frameworks side-by-side. In these hybrid apps you can
 | |
| mix and match AngularJS and Angular components and services and have them interoperate seamlessly.
 | |
| That means you don't have to do the upgrade work all at once as there is a natural coexistence
 | |
| between the two frameworks during the transition period.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### How `ngUpgrade` Works
 | |
| 
 | |
| Regardless of whether you choose `downgradeModule()` or `UpgradeModule`, the basic principles of
 | |
| upgrading, the mental model behind hybrid apps, and how you use the {@link upgrade/static
 | |
| upgrade/static} utilities remain the same. For more information, see the
 | |
| [How `ngUpgrade` Works](guide/upgrade#how-ngupgrade-works) section of
 | |
| [Upgrading from AngularJS](guide/upgrade).
 | |
| 
 | |
| <div class="alert is-helpful">
 | |
| 
 | |
|   The [Change Detection](guide/upgrade#change-detection) section of
 | |
|   [Upgrading from AngularJS](guide/upgrade) only applies to apps that use `UpgradeModule`. Though
 | |
|   you handle change detection differently with `downgradeModule()`, which is the focus of this
 | |
|   guide, reading the [Change Detection](guide/upgrade#change-detection) section provides helpful
 | |
|   context for what follows.
 | |
| 
 | |
| </div>
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Change Detection with `downgradeModule()`
 | |
| 
 | |
| As mentioned before, one of the key differences between `downgradeModule()` and `UpgradeModule` has
 | |
| to do with change detection and how it is propagated between the two frameworks.
 | |
| 
 | |
| With `UpgradeModule`, the two change detection systems are tied together more tightly. Whenever
 | |
| something happens in the AngularJS part of the app, change detection is automatically triggered on
 | |
| the Angular part and vice versa. This is convenient as it ensures that neither framework misses an
 | |
| important change. Most of the time, though, these extra change detection runs are unnecessary.
 | |
| 
 | |
| `downgradeModule()`, on the other side, avoids explicitly triggering change detection unless it
 | |
| knows the other part of the app is interested in the changes. For example, if a downgraded component
 | |
| defines an `@Input()`, chances are that the app needs to be aware when that value changes. Thus,
 | |
| `downgradeComponent()` automatically triggers change detection on that component.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In most cases, though, the changes made locally in a particular component are of no interest to the
 | |
| rest of the app. For example, if the user clicks a button that submits a form, the component usually
 | |
| handles the result of this action. That being said, there _are_ cases where you want to propagate
 | |
| changes to some other part of the app that may be controlled by the other framework. In such cases,
 | |
| you are responsible for notifying the interested parties by manually triggering change detection.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you want a particular piece of code to trigger change detection in the AngularJS part of the app,
 | |
| you need to wrap it in
 | |
| [scope.$apply()](https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/type/$rootScope.Scope#$apply). Similarly, for
 | |
| triggering change detection in Angular you would use {@link NgZone#run ngZone.run()}.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In many cases, a few extra change detection runs may not matter much. However, on larger or
 | |
| change-detection-heavy apps they can have a noticeable impact. By giving you more fine-grained
 | |
| control over the change detection propagation, `downgradeModule()` allows you to achieve better
 | |
| performance for your hybrid apps.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Using `downgradeModule()`
 | |
| 
 | |
| Both AngularJS and Angular have their own concept of modules to help organize an app into cohesive
 | |
| blocks of functionality.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Their details are quite different in architecture and implementation. In AngularJS, you create a
 | |
| module by specifying its name and dependencies with
 | |
| [angular.module()](https://docs.angularjs.org/api/ng/function/angular.module). Then you can add
 | |
| assets using its various methods. In Angular, you create a class adorned with an {@link NgModule
 | |
| NgModule} decorator that describes assets in metadata.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In a hybrid app you run both frameworks at the same time. This means that you need at least one
 | |
| module each from both AngularJS and Angular.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For the most part, you specify the modules in the same way you would for a regular app. Then, you
 | |
| use the `upgrade/static` helpers to let the two frameworks know about assets they can use from each
 | |
| other. This is known as "upgrading" and "downgrading".
 | |
| 
 | |
| <div class="alert is-helpful">
 | |
| 
 | |
|   <b>Definitions:</b>
 | |
| 
 | |
|   - _Upgrading_: The act of making an AngularJS asset, such as a component or service, available to
 | |
|     the Angular part of the app.
 | |
|   - _Downgrading_: The act of making an Angular asset, such as a component or service, available to
 | |
|     the AngularJS part of the app.
 | |
| 
 | |
| </div>
 | |
| 
 | |
| An important part of inter-linking dependencies is linking the two main modules together. This is
 | |
| where `downgradeModule()` comes in. Use it to create an AngularJS module—one that you can use
 | |
| as a dependency in your main AngularJS module—that will bootstrap your main Angular module and
 | |
| kick off the Angular part of the hybrid app. In a sense, it "downgrades" an Angular module to an
 | |
| AngularJS module.
 | |
| 
 | |
| There are a few things to note, though:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. You don't pass the Angular module directly to `downgradeModule()`. All `downgradeModule()` needs
 | |
|    is a "recipe", for example, a factory function, to create an instance for your module.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 2. The Angular module is not instantiated until the app actually needs it.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The following is an example of how you can use `downgradeModule()` to link the two modules.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```ts
 | |
| // Import `downgradeModule()`.
 | |
| import { downgradeModule } from '@angular/upgrade/static';
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Use it to downgrade the Angular module to an AngularJS module.
 | |
| const downgradedModule = downgradeModule(MainAngularModuleFactory);
 | |
| 
 | |
| // Use the downgraded module as a dependency to the main AngularJS module.
 | |
| angular.module('mainAngularJsModule', [
 | |
|   downgradedModule
 | |
| ]);
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Specifying a factory for the Angular module
 | |
| 
 | |
| As mentioned earlier, `downgradeModule()` needs to know how to instantiate the Angular module. It
 | |
| needs a recipe. You define that recipe by providing a factory function that can create an instance
 | |
| of the Angular module. `downgradeModule()` accepts two types of factory functions:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. `NgModuleFactory`
 | |
| 2. `(extraProviders: StaticProvider[]) => Promise<NgModuleRef>`
 | |
| 
 | |
| When you pass an `NgModuleFactory`, `downgradeModule()` uses it to instantiate the module using
 | |
| {@link platformBrowser platformBrowser}'s {@link PlatformRef#bootstrapModuleFactory
 | |
| bootstrapModuleFactory()}, which is compatible with ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation. AOT compilation
 | |
| helps make your apps load faster. For more about AOT and how to create an `NgModuleFactory`, see the
 | |
| [Ahead-of-Time Compilation](guide/aot-compiler) guide.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Alternatively, you can pass a plain function, which is expected to return a promise resolving to an
 | |
| {@link NgModuleRef NgModuleRef} (i.e. an instance of your Angular module). The function is called
 | |
| with an array of extra {@link StaticProvider Providers} that are expected to be available on the
 | |
| returned `NgModuleRef`'s {@link Injector Injector}. For example, if you are using {@link
 | |
| platformBrowser platformBrowser} or {@link platformBrowserDynamic platformBrowserDynamic}, you can
 | |
| pass the `extraProviders` array to them:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```ts
 | |
| const bootstrapFn = (extraProviders: StaticProvider[]) => {
 | |
|   const platformRef = platformBrowserDynamic(extraProviders);
 | |
|   return platformRef.bootstrapModule(MainAngularModule);
 | |
| };
 | |
| // or
 | |
| const bootstrapFn = (extraProviders: StaticProvider[]) => {
 | |
|   const platformRef = platformBrowser(extraProviders);
 | |
|   return platformRef.bootstrapModuleFactory(MainAngularModuleFactory);
 | |
| };
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using an `NgModuleFactory` requires less boilerplate and is a good default option as it supports AOT
 | |
| out-of-the-box. Using a custom function requires slightly more code, but gives you greater
 | |
| flexibility.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| #### Instantiating the Angular module on-demand
 | |
| 
 | |
| Another key difference between `downgradeModule()` and `UpgradeModule` is that the latter requires
 | |
| you to instantiate both the AngularJS and Angular modules up-front. This means that you have to pay
 | |
| the cost of instantiating the Angular part of the app, even if you don't use any Angular assets
 | |
| until later. `downgradeModule()` is again less aggressive. It will only instantiate the Angular part
 | |
| when it is required for the first time; that is, as soon as it needs to create a downgraded
 | |
| component.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You could go a step further and not even download the code for the Angular part of the app to the
 | |
| user's browser until it is needed. This is especially useful when you use Angular on parts of the
 | |
| hybrid app that are not necessary for the initial rendering or that the user doesn't reach.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| A few examples are:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - You use Angular on specific routes only and you don't need it until/if a user visits such a route.
 | |
| - You use Angular for features that are only visible to specific types of users; for example,
 | |
|   logged-in users, administrators, or VIP members. You don't need to load Angular until a user is
 | |
|   authenticated.
 | |
| - You use Angular for a feature that is not critical for the initial rendering of the app and you
 | |
|   can afford a small delay in favor of better initial load performance.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Bootstrapping with `downgradeModule()`
 | |
| 
 | |
| As you might have guessed, you don't need to change anything in the way you bootstrap your existing
 | |
| AngularJS app. Unlike `UpgradeModule`—which requires some extra steps—
 | |
| `downgradeModule()` is able to take care of bootstrapping the Angular module, as long as you provide
 | |
| the recipe.
 | |
| 
 | |
| In order to start using any `upgrade/static` APIs, you still need to load the Angular framework as
 | |
| you would in a normal Angular app. You can see how this can be done with SystemJS by following the
 | |
| instructions in the [Upgrade Setup](guide/upgrade-setup "Setup for Upgrading from AngularJS") guide, selectively copying code from the
 | |
| [QuickStart github repository](https://github.com/angular/quickstart).
 | |
| 
 | |
| You also need to install the `@angular/upgrade` package via `npm install @angular/upgrade --save`
 | |
| and add a mapping for the `@angular/upgrade/static` package:
 | |
| 
 | |
| <code-example header="system.config.js">
 | |
| '@angular/upgrade/static': 'npm:@angular/upgrade/bundles/upgrade-static.umd.js',
 | |
| </code-example>
 | |
| 
 | |
| Next, create an `app.module.ts` file and add the following `NgModule` class:
 | |
| 
 | |
| <code-example header="app.module.ts">
 | |
| import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
 | |
| import { BrowserModule } from '@angular/platform-browser';
 | |
| 
 | |
| @NgModule({
 | |
|   imports: [
 | |
|     BrowserModule
 | |
|   ]
 | |
| })
 | |
| export class MainAngularModule {
 | |
|   // Empty placeholder method to satisfy the `Compiler`.
 | |
|   ngDoBootstrap() {}
 | |
| }
 | |
| </code-example>
 | |
| 
 | |
| This bare minimum `NgModule` imports `BrowserModule`, the module every Angular browser-based app
 | |
| must have. It also defines an empty `ngDoBootstrap()` method, to prevent the {@link Compiler
 | |
| Compiler} from returning errors. This is necessary because the module will not have a `bootstrap`
 | |
| declaration on its `NgModule` decorator.
 | |
| 
 | |
| <div class="alert is-important">
 | |
| 
 | |
|   You do not add a `bootstrap` declaration to the `NgModule` decorator since AngularJS owns the root
 | |
|   template of the app and `ngUpgrade` bootstraps the necessary components.
 | |
| 
 | |
| </div>
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can now link the AngularJS and Angular modules together using `downgradeModule()`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| <code-example header="app.module.ts">
 | |
| import { platformBrowserDynamic } from '@angular/platform-browser-dynamic';
 | |
| import { downgradeModule } from '@angular/upgrade/static';
 | |
| 
 | |
| const bootstrapFn = (extraProviders: StaticProvider[]) => {
 | |
|   const platformRef = platformBrowserDynamic(extraProviders);
 | |
|   return platformRef.bootstrapModule(MainAngularModule);
 | |
| };
 | |
| const downgradedModule = downgradeModule(bootstrapFn);
 | |
| 
 | |
| angular.module('mainAngularJsModule', [
 | |
|   downgradedModule
 | |
| ]);
 | |
| </code-example>
 | |
| 
 | |
| The existing AngularJS code works as before _and_ you are ready to start adding Angular code.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ### Using Components and Injectables
 | |
| 
 | |
| The differences between `downgradeModule()` and `UpgradeModule` end here. The rest of the
 | |
| `upgrade/static` APIs and concepts work in the exact same way for both types of hybrid apps.
 | |
| See [Upgrading from AngularJS](guide/upgrade) to learn about:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - [Using Angular Components from AngularJS Code](guide/upgrade#using-angular-components-from-angularjs-code).<br />
 | |
|   _NOTE: If you are downgrading multiple modules, you need to specify the name of the downgraded
 | |
|   module each component belongs to, when calling `downgradeComponent()`._
 | |
| - [Using AngularJS Component Directives from Angular Code](guide/upgrade#using-angularjs-component-directives-from-angular-code).
 | |
| - [Projecting AngularJS Content into Angular Components](guide/upgrade#projecting-angularjs-content-into-angular-components).
 | |
| - [Transcluding Angular Content into AngularJS Component Directives](guide/upgrade#transcluding-angular-content-into-angularjs-component-directives).
 | |
| - [Making AngularJS Dependencies Injectable to Angular](guide/upgrade#making-angularjs-dependencies-injectable-to-angular).
 | |
| - [Making Angular Dependencies Injectable to AngularJS](guide/upgrade#making-angular-dependencies-injectable-to-angularjs).<br />
 | |
|   _NOTE: If you are downgrading multiple modules, you need to specify the name of the downgraded
 | |
|   module each injectable belongs to, when calling `downgradeInjectable()`._
 | |
| 
 | |
| <div class="alert is-important">
 | |
| 
 | |
|   While it is possible to downgrade injectables, downgraded injectables will not be available until
 | |
|   the Angular module that provides them is instantiated. In order to be safe, you need to ensure
 | |
|   that the downgraded injectables are not used anywhere _outside_ the part of the app where it is
 | |
|   guaranteed that their module has been instantiated.
 | |
| 
 | |
|   For example, it is _OK_ to use a downgraded service in an upgraded component that is only used
 | |
|   from a downgraded Angular component provided by the same Angular module as the injectable, but it
 | |
|   is _not OK_ to use it in an AngularJS component that may be used independently of Angular or use
 | |
|   it in a downgraded Angular component from a different module.
 | |
| 
 | |
| </div>
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Using ahead-of-time compilation with hybrid apps
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can take advantage of ahead-of-time (AOT) compilation in hybrid apps just like in any other
 | |
| Angular app. The setup for a hybrid app is mostly the same as described in the
 | |
| [Ahead-of-Time Compilation](guide/aot-compiler) guide save for differences in `index.html` and
 | |
| `main-aot.ts`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| AOT needs to load any AngularJS files that are in the `<script>` tags in the AngularJS `index.html`.
 | |
| An easy way to copy them is to add each to the `copy-dist-files.js` file.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You also need to pass the generated `MainAngularModuleFactory` to `downgradeModule()` instead of the
 | |
| custom bootstrap function:
 | |
| 
 | |
| <code-example header="app/main-aot.ts">
 | |
| import { downgradeModule } from '@angular/upgrade/static';
 | |
| import { MainAngularModuleNgFactory } from '../aot/app/app.module.ngfactory';
 | |
| 
 | |
| const downgradedModule = downgradeModule(MainAngularModuleNgFactory);
 | |
| 
 | |
| angular.module('mainAngularJsModule', [
 | |
|   downgradedModule
 | |
| ]);
 | |
| </code-example>
 | |
| 
 | |
| And that is all you need to do to get the full benefit of AOT for hybrid Angular apps.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Conclusion
 | |
| 
 | |
| This page covered how to use the {@link upgrade/static upgrade/static} package to incrementally
 | |
| upgrade existing AngularJS apps at your own pace and without impeding further development of the app
 | |
| for the duration of the upgrade process.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Specifically, this guide showed how you can achieve better performance and greater flexibility in
 | |
| your hybrid apps by using {@link downgradeModule downgradeModule()} instead of {@link UpgradeModule
 | |
| UpgradeModule}.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To summarize, the key differentiating factors of `downgradeModule()` are:
 | |
| 
 | |
| 1. It allows instantiating or even loading the Angular part lazily, which improves the initial
 | |
|    loading time. In some cases this may waive the cost of running a second framework altogether.
 | |
| 2. It improves performance by avoiding unnecessary change detection runs while giving the developer
 | |
|    greater ability to customize.
 | |
| 3. It does not require you to change how you bootstrap your AngularJS app.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Using `downgradeModule()` is a good option for hybrid apps when you want to keep the AngularJS and
 | |
| Angular parts less coupled. You can still mix and match components and services from both
 | |
| frameworks, but you might need to manually propagate change detection. In return,
 | |
| `downgradeModule()` offers more control and better performance.
 |