2018-03-07 11:33:49 -05:00
|
|
|
Database migration:
|
|
|
|
|
update table TRM_CODESYSTEM_VER drop column RES_VERSION_ID;
|
2018-03-11 16:46:59 -04:00
|
|
|
drop constraint IDX_CSV_RESOURCEPID_AND_VER from table TRM_CODESYSTEM_VER
|
2018-03-07 11:33:49 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-10 18:31:27 -05:00
|
|
|
TODO:
|
|
|
|
|
In answer lists, figure out what to do with externally defined lists
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comments for Loinc:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-11 10:44:11 -04:00
|
|
|
Overall
|
|
|
|
|
- ValueSet and ConceptMap resources have a spot for copyright and
|
|
|
|
|
contact information. Are there official values for these?
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-10 18:31:27 -05:00
|
|
|
Answer Lists
|
|
|
|
|
- Per the notes, there is no way in FHIR currently to map answer lists to
|
|
|
|
|
codes based on context. For this reason, I am ignoring any entries in
|
|
|
|
|
LoincAnswerListLink_Beta_1.csv where the "ApplicableContext" context is
|
|
|
|
|
not empty. Is this correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parts
|
|
|
|
|
- Only parts with a status of "ACTIVE" are being imported, any others are
|
|
|
|
|
ignored.
|
|
|
|
|
- The PartTypeName (e.g. "ADJUSTMENT") is ignored as there is no corresponding
|
|
|
|
|
property in loinc.xml
|
|
|
|
|
- PartDisplayName is not mapped
|
2018-03-11 10:44:11 -04:00
|
|
|
- Part links are not currently processed (it's not clear to me how to model
|
|
|
|
|
these in FHIR, as CodeSystem.hierarchyMeaning has to be only one of 'is-a'
|
|
|
|
|
or 'part-of' and presumably the 'is-a' relationship is more important.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part Mappings
|
|
|
|
|
- I have made LOINC the source and SCT the target for the mappings in the
|
|
|
|
|
ConceptMap resource. Does this seem like the appropriate orientation?
|
|
|
|
|
- A canonical URI should be defined for the LOINC->SCT mapping ConceptMap
|
|
|
|
|
resource. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/loinc-to-snomed" for now, but
|
|
|
|
|
we should discuss what is appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RSNA Playbook
|
|
|
|
|
- A canonical URI should be defined for the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet.
|
|
|
|
|
I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/rsna-codes" for now but we should discuss
|
|
|
|
|
what is appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
- A name for the "RSNA Playbook" ValueSet is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
- Just to confirm, the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet should contain the
|
|
|
|
|
loinc codes (e.g. "17787-3") and not the part codes (e.g. "LP199995-4")?
|
|
|
|
|
- A codesystem URI for radlex RID and RPID codes is needed (currently
|
|
|
|
|
"http://rid" and "http://rpid" are used as placeholders since I'm assuming
|
|
|
|
|
these exist somewhere.
|
|
|
|
|
- For mappings from loinc part codes to RadLex RIDs, are the codes considered
|
|
|
|
|
equivalent (or would they be wider/narrower). They look equivalent to me.
|
2018-03-10 18:31:27 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-11 10:44:11 -04:00
|
|
|
Document Ontology
|
2018-03-11 11:02:13 -04:00
|
|
|
- Per the SOW, "A value set containing terms in the LOINC Document Ontology
|
|
|
|
|
will be created". Just to confirm, entries in this ValueSet are therefore
|
|
|
|
|
LOINC terms (such as "11488-4 / Consultation Note") as opposed to part
|
|
|
|
|
codes?
|
2018-03-11 10:44:11 -04:00
|
|
|
- Need to define a URI for the document ontology ValueSet. Currently I am
|
|
|
|
|
using "http://loinc.org/document-ontology-codes"
|
2018-03-07 11:33:49 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-11 16:46:59 -04:00
|
|
|
Top 2000
|
|
|
|
|
- Need to define a URI for both ValueSets. Currently I am using
|
|
|
|
|
"http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-us" and
|
|
|
|
|
"http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-si"
|
2018-03-19 08:51:02 -04:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal Order Set
|
|
|
|
|
- Need to define a URI for this ValueSet - Currenty using "http://loinc.org/fhir/loinc-universal-order-set"
|
