honeymoose
/
hapi-fhir
mirror of https://github.com/hapifhir/hapi-fhir.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Loinc updates

This commit is contained in:
jamesagnew 2018-03-12 06:25:30 -04:00
parent 30cd63b929
commit a6bab6095f
1 changed files with 15 additions and 38 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

53
LOINC_NOTES.txt
View File

@ -8,54 +8,31 @@ TODO:
Comments for Loinc: Comments for Loinc:
Overall Overall
- ValueSet and ConceptMap resources have a spot for copyright and - ValueSet and ConceptMap resources have a spot for copyright and contact information. Are there official values for these?
contact information. Are there official values for these?
Answer Lists Answer Lists
- Per the notes, there is no way in FHIR currently to map answer lists to - Per the notes, there is no way in FHIR currently to map answer lists to codes based on context. For this reason, I am ignoring any entries in LoincAnswerListLink_Beta_1.csv where the "ApplicableContext" context is not empty. Is this correct?
codes based on context. For this reason, I am ignoring any entries in
LoincAnswerListLink_Beta_1.csv where the "ApplicableContext" context is
not empty. Is this correct?
Parts Parts
- Only parts with a status of "ACTIVE" are being imported, any others are - Only parts with a status of "ACTIVE" are being imported, any others are ignored. Does this make sense?
ignored. - The PartTypeName (e.g. "ADJUSTMENT") is ignored as there is no corresponding property in loinc.xml
- The PartTypeName (e.g. "ADJUSTMENT") is ignored as there is no corresponding - PartDisplayName does not have an obvious mapping to FHIR
property in loinc.xml - Part links are not currently processed (it's not clear to me how to model these in FHIR, as CodeSystem.hierarchyMeaning has to be only one of 'is-a' or 'part-of' and presumably the 'is-a' relationship is more important.
- PartDisplayName is not mapped
- Part links are not currently processed (it's not clear to me how to model
these in FHIR, as CodeSystem.hierarchyMeaning has to be only one of 'is-a'
or 'part-of' and presumably the 'is-a' relationship is more important.
Part Mappings Part Mappings
- I have made LOINC the source and SCT the target for the mappings in the - I have made LOINC the source and SCT the target for the mappings in the ConceptMap resource. Does this seem like the appropriate orientation?
ConceptMap resource. Does this seem like the appropriate orientation? - A canonical URI should be defined for the LOINC->SCT mapping ConceptMap resource. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/loinc-to-snomed" for now, but we should discuss what is appropriate.
- A canonical URI should be defined for the LOINC->SCT mapping ConceptMap
resource. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/loinc-to-snomed" for now, but
we should discuss what is appropriate.
RSNA Playbook RSNA Playbook
- A canonical URI should be defined for the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet. - A canonical URI should be defined for the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet. I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/rsna-codes" for now but we should discuss what is appropriate.
I have hardcoded "http://loinc.org/rsna-codes" for now but we should discuss
what is appropriate.
- A name for the "RSNA Playbook" ValueSet is needed. - A name for the "RSNA Playbook" ValueSet is needed.
- Just to confirm, the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet should contain the - Just to confirm, the "all RSNA playbook codes" ValueSet should contain the loinc codes (e.g. "17787-3") and not the part codes (e.g. "LP199995-4")?
loinc codes (e.g. "17787-3") and not the part codes (e.g. "LP199995-4")? - A codesystem URI for radlex RID and RPID codes is needed (currently "http://rid" and "http://rpid" are used as placeholders since I'm assuming these exist somewhere.
- A codesystem URI for radlex RID and RPID codes is needed (currently - For mappings from loinc part codes to RadLex RIDs, are the codes considered equivalent (or would they be wider/narrower). They look equivalent to me.
"http://rid" and "http://rpid" are used as placeholders since I'm assuming
these exist somewhere.
- For mappings from loinc part codes to RadLex RIDs, are the codes considered
equivalent (or would they be wider/narrower). They look equivalent to me.
Document Ontology Document Ontology
- Per the SOW, "A value set containing terms in the LOINC Document Ontology - Per the SOW, "A value set containing terms in the LOINC Document Ontology will be created". Just to confirm, entries in this ValueSet are therefore LOINC terms (such as "11488-4 / Consultation Note") as opposed to part codes?
will be created". Just to confirm, entries in this ValueSet are therefore - Need to define a URI for the document ontology ValueSet. Currently I am using "http://loinc.org/document-ontology-codes"
LOINC terms (such as "11488-4 / Consultation Note") as opposed to part
codes?
- Need to define a URI for the document ontology ValueSet. Currently I am
using "http://loinc.org/document-ontology-codes"
Top 2000 Top 2000
- Need to define a URI for both ValueSets. Currently I am using - Need to define a URI for both ValueSets. Currently I am using "http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-us" and "http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-si"
"http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-us" and
"http://loinc.org/top-2000-lab-results-si"