Currently the code sample displayed in this guide is not a valid.
The `trigger` is directly used in the `@Component` decorator.
It should instead be in the `animations` array of the `@Component` decorator.
PR Close#37262
The previous image referred to "Mr IQ". The example application
(and the content of the referring guide) actually uses "Dr IQ".
Closes#34823
PR Close#40022
The previous tutorial content referred to a `Routes` member of
`AppRoutingModule`, which is not correct. Instead there is a
`routes` variable that is passed to the `forRoot()` method when
configuring the `AppRoutingModule`.
Replaces #36583
PR Close#40023
1. In line 25 changed the word "components" to "component's".
2. In line 66 changed the phrase "you never refer to them" to "you should never refer to them".
3. Appended the paragraph containing the above phrase in a `div` with the class `alert is-helpful`.
PR Close#39246
Remove the statements where mentions the component in the `entryComponents`
array inside `NgModule` metadata.
This is not required since Angular version 9.
PR Close#39242
Aside from using the @input() decorator, we can use the @Attrbitute decorator too.
Of course, those two are different and support different causes.
I expected to see a working example on the Attribute Bindings section, but I didn't find one.
This PR depicts the usage of the Attribute decorator between two components
PR Close#38721
after angular version 8 string based lazy loading is not activated by default it is an opt in behaviour in which you have to add the lazy loaded routes in the tsconfig file for compilation. Aded a note too that it will be removed in version 11.
Fixes#35652
PR Close#35956
Since #39853, it is possible to deploy to multiple Firebase sites from a
single branch. In order to deploy to a site, we need to associate an
alias (`aio`) with a site. This is done via the `firebase target:apply`
command. However, when the command is called multiple times, it
associates the alias with many sites, which subsequently fails during
deployment ([example failure][1]), since the `firebase deploy` command
does not know what site to deploy to.
This commit fixes the deployment script by ensuring that any previous
association with the `aio` alias is cleared (via the
`firebase target:clear` command) before associating it with a new site.
[1]: https://circleci.com/gh/angular/angular/871020
PR Close#39948
Previously, test descriptions used `latest` to refer to the most
recent/highest version. This was ambiguous, because `latest` can also
refer to the stable version of a package (e.g. see `@latest` npm tag).
This commit replaces `latest` with `highest` (or `highest for major`) to
reduce ambiguity.
Discussed in:
https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/39853#discussion_r531730317
PR Close#39853
Currently there is an issue with redirecting `rc.angular.io` to
`angular.io` when there is no active RC. If a user has visited
`rc.angular.io` before and has a ServiceWorker registered for that
subdomain, they will never "see" the redirect to `angular.io`.
This commit fixes the problem by doing an additional deployment from the
stable branch to the `rc-angular-io-site` Firebase site when there is no
active RC. This additional deployment will ensure that:
1. Users will be temporarily redirected from `rc.angular.io` to
`angular.io`.
2. Users with a registered ServiceWorker (who don't see the redirect)
will have their ServiceWorker unregistered on the next visit.
3. The content on both sites is identical.
See #39760 for more details on the problem and the solution.
NOTE:
As mentioned in #39760, for this fix to take affect, we need to remove
the redirect from `rc.angular.io` to `angular.io` in the Firebase
console for site `rc-angular-io-site`.
Fixes#39760
PR Close#39853
Previously, a branch would be deployed as `archive` even if it had a
major version that was equal/higher than that of the stable branch (as
long as it was not the RC branch - i.e. not the most recent minor
branch). For example, with `11.0.x` as the stable branch and `12.0.x`
as the RC branch, `11.1.x` would be deployed as archive.
Theoretically, we should never find ourselves in such a situation.
Typically, there will only be at most one minor branch most recent than
the stable one (and that branch will be the RC branch). However, it
is possible under unusual circumstances.
This commit adds additional checks to guard against this problem. It
also refactors the code in preparation of fixing an issue with
`rc.angular.io` redirects in the presence of a ServiceWorker, which will
require identifying whether there is an active RC version or not.
See #39760 for more details.
PR Close#39853
Previously, the latest commit for branch may be computed multiple times
in the `deploy-to-firebase.js` tests.
This commit avoids the unnecessary re-computations by computing the
latest commits for the necessary branches at the beginning and using the
computed values throughout the tests.
PR Close#39853
Previously, the `deploy-to-firebase.js` script would only perform one
deployment operation on each run.
This commit adds support for performing multiple deployment operations.
NOTE:
In a subsequent commit, this will be leveraged fix an issue with
`rc.angular.io` redirects in the presence of a ServiceWorker by
deploying the same artifacts to multiple Firebase projects/sites.
See #39760 for more details.
PR Close#39853
Previously, the `deploy()` function in `deploy-to-firebase.js` would
also perform other operations (beyond deploying), such as building the
app, checking the generated payload size, testing the PWA score of the
deployed app.
This commit decouples these operations, so that deploying can be
performed independently.
NOTE:
In a subsequent commit, this will be leveraged fix an issue with
`rc.angular.io` redirects in the presence of a ServiceWorker by
deploying the same artifacts to multiple Firebase projects/sites.
See #39760 for more details.
PR Close#39853
Since we turned off the Selenium Promise Manager in #39600, the AIO e2e
tests have started flaking on CI. After trying out several things, the
only change that seems to eliminate the flakiness is turning the
Selenium Promise Manager back on (see #39873 for more details).
This commit turns the Selenium Project Manager on to get rid of the
flakiness.
Fixes#39872
PR Close#39905
This commit edits the copy on the interpolation page.
Tightens language, clarifies headers, and streamlines text.
There are no content or code changes.
PR Close#38687
DEPRECATION:
Mark the {[key: string]: any} type for the options property of the FormBuilder.group method as deprecated.
Using AbstractControlOptions gives the same functionality and is type-safe.
PR Close#39769
This adds angulararchitects.io to the tranings section in the
resources.json file for angular.io. It also adds a description
for angulararchitects.io.
PR Close#37139
The article previously referred was out of date. Most of the article content
was already duplicated here, or described how to generate multiple bundles. But
creating multiple bundles manually is now obsolete and the parameter `--localize`
should be preferred instead, because it is much faster.
This commit integrate the only interesting part left, relating to webserver configuration.
Co-authored-by: David Shevitz <dshevitz@google.com>
PR Close#36553
`en-US` makes it link to the English (US) version.
This patch removes this and let's MDN auto-redirect to the user's preferred/selected language/website locale.
PR Close#39842
This commit disables the Selenium Promise Manager when running e2e tests
for docs examples in order to more closely align them with new apps
created with CLI v11. This change requires that any async operations in
tests are handled explicitly (e.g. using `async/await` or
`Promise#then()`).
PR Close#39818
This commit removes some code that is no longer necessary for the
`upgrade-module` docs example e2e tests to run. It used to be necessary
in earlier version of Protractor but not any more.
PR Close#39818
Previously, the tests made no meaningful assertions. It seems that the
intention was to ensure that some elements were present on the page, but
all the assertions did was verify that the corresponding
`ElementFinder`s were defined. The `ElementFinder`s would always be
defined, even if there were no corresponding elements on the page. In
fact, some of the `ElementFinder` selectors were incorrect, so they did
not match any actual elements.
This commit fixes the tests by fixing the `ElementFinder` selectors and
asserting that the elements are actually present on the page.
PR Close#39818
Previously, the test made no meaningful assertion. It seems that the
intention was to ensure that some elements were present on the page, but
all the assertions did was verify that the corresponding
`ElementFinder`s were defined. The `ElementFinder`s would always be
defined, even if there were no corresponding elements on the page. In
fact, some of the `ElementFinder` selectors were incorrect, so they did
not match any actual elements.
This commit fixes the tests by fixing the `ElementFinder` selectors and
asserting that the elements are actually present on the page.
PR Close#39818