@angular/core/testing provide `async` test utility, but the name `async` is
confusing with the javascript keyword `async`. And in some test case, if you
want to use both the `async` from `@angular/core/testing` and `async/await`,
you may have to write the code like this.
```typescript
it('test async operations', async(async() => {
const result = await asyncMethod();
expect(result).toEqual('expected');
}));
```
So in this PR, the `async` is renamed to `waitForAsync` and also deprecate `async`.
PR Close#37583
This reverts commit b4449e35bf.
The example given from the previous change was for a component selector and not a provider selector.
This change fixes it.
Fixes#38323.
PR Close#38325
This reverts commit 7f8c2225f2.
This commit caused test failures internally, which were traced back to the
optimizer removing NgModuleFactory constructor calls when those calls caused
side-effectful registration of NgModules by their ids.
PR Close#38303
This allows Closure compiler to tree shake unused constructor calls to `NgModuleFactory`, which is otherwise considered
side-effectful. The Angular compiler generates factory objects which are exported but typically not used, as they are
only needed for compatibility with View Engine. This results in top-level constructor calls, such as:
```typescript
export const FooNgFactory = new NgModuleFactory(Foo);
```
`NgModuleFactory` has a side-effecting constructor, so this statement cannot be tree shaken, even if `FooNgFactory` is
never imported. The `NgModuleFactory` continues to reference its associated `NgModule` and prevents the module and all
its unused dependencies from being tree shaken. This effectively prevents all components from being tree shaken, making
Closure builds significantly larger than they should be.
The fix here is to wrap `NgModuleFactory` constructor with `noSideEffects(() => /* ... */)`, which tricks the Closure
compiler into assuming that the invoked function has no side effects. This allows it to tree-shake unused
`NgModuleFactory()` constructors when they aren't imported. Since the factory can be removed, the module can also be
removed (if nothing else references it), thus tree shaking unused components as expected.
PR Close#38147
```
export const __core_private_testing_placeholder__ = '';
```
This API should be removed. But doing so seems to break `google3` and
so it requires a bit of investigation. A work around is to mark it as
`@codeGenApi` for now and investigate later.
PR Close#38274
`Attribute` decorator has defined `attributeName` as optional but actually its
mandatory and compiler throws an error if `attributeName` is undefined. Made
`attributeName` mandatory in the `Attribute` decorator to reflect this functionality
Fixes#32658
PR Close#38131
Now we have two implementations of Zone in Angular, one is NgZone, the other is NoopZone.
They should have the same signatures, includes
1. properties
2. methods
In this PR, unify the signatures of the two implementations, and remove the unnecessary cast.
PR Close#37581
Previously the instructions were included in the golden files to monitor the frequency and rate of
the instruction API changes for the purpose of understanding the stability of this API (as it was
considered for becoming a public API and deployed to npm via generated code).
This experiment has confirmed that the instruction API is not stable enough to be used as public
API. We've since also came up with an alternative plan to compile libraries with the Ivy compiler
for npm deployment and this plan does not rely on making Ivy instructions public.
For these reasons, I'm removing the instructions from the golden files as it's no longer important
to track them.
The are three instructions that are still being included: `ɵɵdefineInjectable`, `ɵɵinject`, and
`ɵɵInjectableDef`.
These instructions are already generated by the VE compiler to support tree-shakable providers, and
code depending on these instructions is already deployed to npm. For this reason we need to treat
them as public api.
This change also reduces the code review overhead, because changes to public api golden files now
require multiple approvals.
PR Close#38224
This commit creates a sample forms test application to introduce the symbol
tests. It serves as a guard to ensure that any future work on the
forms package does not unintentionally increase the payload size.
PR Close#38044
This commit fixes the spelling of the singular form
of the word function to the plural spelling in
packages/core/src/application_init.ts
PR Close#36586
This commit updates synthetic host property and listener instruction names to better align with other instructions.
The `ɵɵupdateSyntheticHostBinding` instruction was renamed to `ɵɵsyntheticHostProperty` (to match the `ɵɵhostProperty`
instruction name) and `ɵɵcomponentHostSyntheticListener` was renamed to `ɵɵsyntheticHostListener` since this
instruction is generated for both Components and Directives (so 'component' is removed from the name).
This PR is a followup after PR #35568.
PR Close#37145
This is part of a re-factor of template syntax and
structure. The first phase breaks out template syntax
into multiple documents. The second phase will be
a rewrite of each doc.
Specifically, this PR does the following:
- Breaks sections of the current template syntax document each into their own page.
- Corrects the links to and from these new pages.
- Adds template syntax subsection to the left side NAV which contains all the new pages.
- Adds the new files to pullapprove.
PR Close#36954
We currently use 16 bits to store information about nodes in a view.
The 16 bits give us 65536 entries in the array, but the problem is that while
the number is large, it can be reached by ~4300 directive instances with host
bindings which could realistically happen is a very large view, as seen in #37876.
Once we hit the limit, we end up overflowing which eventually leads to a runtime error.
These changes bump to using 20 bits which gives us around 1048576 entries in
the array or 16 times more than the current amount which could still technically
be reached, but is much less likely and the user may start hitting browser limitations
by that point.
I picked the 20 bit number since it gives us enough buffer over the 16 bit one,
while not being as massive as a 24 bit or 32 bit.
I've also added a dev mode assertion so it's easier to track down if it happens
again in the future.
Fixes#37876.
PR Close#38014
We recently reworked our `ng_rollup_bundle` rule to no longer output
ESM5 and to optimize applications properly (previously applications were
not optimized properly due to incorrect build optimizer setup).
This change meant that a lot of symbols have been removed from the
golden correctly. See: fd65958b88
Unfortunately though, a few symbols have been accidentally removed
because they are now part of the bundle as ES2015 classes which the
symbol extractor does not pick up. This commit fixes the symbol
extractor to capture ES2015 classes. We also update the golden to
reflect this change.
PR Close#38093
Currently we read lifecycle hooks eagerly during `ɵɵdefineComponent`.
The result is that it is not possible to do any sort of meta-programing
such as mixins or adding lifecycle hooks using custom decorators since
any such code executes after `ɵɵdefineComponent` has extracted the
lifecycle hooks from the prototype. Additionally the behavior is
inconsistent between AOT and JIT mode. In JIT mode overriding lifecycle
hooks is possible because the whole `ɵɵdefineComponent` is placed in
getter which is executed lazily. This is because JIT mode must compile a
template which can be specified as `templateURL` and those we are
waiting for its resolution.
- `+` `ɵɵdefineComponent` becomes smaller as it no longer needs to copy
lifecycle hooks from prototype to `ComponentDef`
- `-` `ɵɵNgOnChangesFeature` feature is now always included with the
codebase as it is no longer tree shakable.
Previously we have read lifecycle hooks from prototype in the
`ɵɵdefineComponent` so that lifecycle hook access would be monomorphic.
This decision was made before we had `T*` data structures. By not
reading the lifecycle hooks we are moving the megamorhic read form
`ɵɵdefineComponent` to instructions. However, the reads happen on
`firstTemplatePass` only and are subsequently cached in the `T*` data
structures. The result is that the overall performance should be same
(or slightly better as the intermediate `ComponentDef` has been
removed.)
- [ ] Remove `ɵɵNgOnChangesFeature` from compiler. (It will no longer
be a feature.)
- [ ] Discuss the future of `Features` as they hinder meta-programing.
Fix#30497
PR Close#35464
Fixes the following issues related to how we validate properties during JIT:
- The invalid property warning was printing `null` as the node name
for `ng-content`. The problem is that when generating a template from
`ng-content` we weren't capturing the node name.
- We weren't running property validation on `ng-container` at all.
This used to be supported on ViewEngine and seems like an oversight.
In the process of making these changes, I found and cleaned up a
few places where we were passing in `LView` unnecessarily.
PR Close#37773
One of the ivy acceptance tests currently fails in IE10. This
is because we recently added a new test that asserts that injecting
`ViewRef` results in a `NullInjectorError`.
Due to limitations in TypeScript and in polyfills for `setPrototypeOf`,
the error cannot be thrown as `ViewRef` is always considered injectable.
In reality, `ViewRef` should not be injectable, as explicitly noted
in c00f4ab2ae.
There seems no way to simulate the proper prototype chain in such
browsers that do not natively support `__proto__`, so TypeScript
and `core-js` polyfills simply break the prototype chain and
assign inherited properties directly on `ViewRef`. i.e. so that
`ViewRef.__NG_ELEMENT_ID__` exists and DI picks it up.
There is a way for TypeScript to theoretically generate proper
prototype chain in ES5 output, but they intend to only bother
about the proper prototype chain in ES6 where `setPrototypeOf`
etc. are offically standarized. See the response:
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/1601#issuecomment-94892833.
PR Close#37892
Before this refactoring we had the WrappedValue class in
2 separate places:
- packages/core/src/change_detection/change_detection_util.ts
- packages/core/src/util/WrappedValue.ts
This commit removes the duplicate, leaving the class that has
the deprecation notice.
PR Close#37940
Currently when the `plural` or `select` keywords in an ICU contain trailing spaces (e.g. `{count, select , ...}`), these spaces are also included into the key names in ICU vars (e.g. "VAR_SELECT "). These trailing spaces are not desirable, since they will later be converted into `_` symbols while normalizing placeholder names, thus causing mismatches at runtime (i.e. placeholder will not be replaced with the correct value). This commit updates the code to trim these spaces while generating an object with placeholders, to make sure the runtime logic can replace these placeholders with the right values.
PR Close#37866
change in the definition of providedIn:any any instance creates a singleton instance
for each lazy loaded module and one instance for eager loaded module
PR Close#35292
PR https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/37523 failed when trying to use `rxjs delay` operator
inside `fakeAsync`, and the reasons are:
1. we need to import `rxjs-fake-async` patch to make the integration work.
2. since in `angular` repo, the bazel target `/tools/testing:node` not using `zone-testing` bundle,
instead it load `zone-spec` packages seperately, so it causes one issue which is the `zone.js/testing/fake-async`
package is not loaded, we do have a fallback logic under `packages/core/testing` calles `fake_async_fallback`,
but the logic is out of date with `fake-async` under `zone.js` package.
So this PR, I updated the content of `fake_async_fallback` to make it consistent with
`fake-async`. And I will make another PR to try to remove the `fallback` logic.
PR Close#37680
Invoking a callback registered through `ViewRef.onDestroy` throws an error, because we weren't registering it correctly in the internal data structure. These changes also remove the `storeCleanupFn` function, because it was mostly identical to `storeCleanupWithContext` and was only used in one place.
Fixes#36213.
PR Close#37543
Special DI tokens like `ChangeDetectorRef` and `ElementRef` can provide a factory via `NG_ELEMENT_ID`. The problem is that we were reading it off the token as `token[NG_ELEMENT_ID]` which will go up the prototype chain if it couldn't be found on the current token, resulting in the private `ViewRef` API being exposed, because it extends `ChangeDetectorRef`.
These changes fix the issue by guarding the property access with `hasOwnProperty`.
Fixes#36235.
PR Close#37574
Verify that HTML parsing is supported in addition to DOMParser existence.
This maybe wasn't as important before when DOMParser was used just as a
fallback on Firefox, but now that DOMParser is the default choice, we need
to be more accurate.
PR Close#36578
The `inertDocument` member is only needed when using the InertDocument
strategy. By separating the DOMParser and InertDocument strategies into
separate classes, we can easily avoid creating the inert document
unnecessarily when using DOMParser.
PR Close#36578
If [innerHTML] is used in a component and a Content-Security-Policy is set
that does not allow inline styles then Firefox and Chrome show the following
message:
> Content Security Policy: The page’s settings observed the loading of a
resource at self (“default-src”). A CSP report is being sent.
This message is caused because Angular is creating an inline style tag to
test for a browser bug that we use to decide what sanitization strategy to
use, which causes CSP violation errors if inline CSS is prohibited.
This test is no longer necessary, since the `DOMParser` is now safe to use
and the `style` based check is redundant.
In this fix, we default to using `DOMParser` if it is available and fall back
to `createHTMLDocument()` if needed. This is the approach used by DOMPurify
too.
The related unit tests in `html_sanitizer_spec.ts`, "should not allow
JavaScript execution when creating inert document" and "should not allow
JavaScript hidden in badly formed HTML to get through sanitization (Firefox
bug)", are left untouched to assert that the behavior hasn't changed in
those scenarios.
Fixes#25214.
PR Close#36578
This commit replaces an assert with more descriptive error message that is thrown in case `<ng-template>` or `<ng-container>` is used as host element for a Component.
Resolves#35240.
PR Close#35916
Currently when bootstrapped component is being removed using `ComponentRef.destroy` or `NgModuleRef.destroy` methods, DOM nodes may be retained in the DOM tree. This commit fixes that problem by always attaching host element of the internal root view to the component's host view node, so the cleanup can happen correctly.
Resolves#36449.
PR Close#37600
As of v10, the `undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields` migration
generally deals with undecorated classes using Angular features. We
intended to run this migation as part of v10 again as undecorated
classes with Angular features are no longer supported in planned v11.
The migration currently behaves incorrectly in some cases where an
`@Injectable` or `@Pipe` decorated classes uses the `ngOnDestroy`
lifecycle hook. We incorrectly add a TODO for those classes. This
commit fixes that.
Additionally, this change makes the migration more robust to
not migrate a class if it inherits from a component, pipe
injectable or non-abstract directive. We previously did not
need this as the undecorated-classes-with-di migration ran
before, but this is no longer the case.
Last, this commit fixes an issue where multiple TODO's could be
added. This happens when multiple Angular CLI build targets have
an overlap in source files. Multiple programs then capture the
same source file, causing the migration to detect an undecorated
class multiple times (i.e. adding a TODO twice).
Fixes#37726.
PR Close#37732
Interestingly enough, our rollup bundle optimization pipeline
did not work properly before 1b827b058e5060963590628d4735e6ac83c6dfdd.
Unused declarations were not elided because build optimizer did not
consider the Angular packages as side-effect free. Build optimizer has
a hard-coded list of Angular packages that are considered side-effect
free. Though this one did not match in the old version of the rollup
bundle rule, as internal sources were resolved through their resolved
bazel-out paths. Hence build optimizer could not detect the known
Angular framework packages. Now though, since we leverage the
Bazel-idiomatic `@bazel/rollup` implementation, sources are resolved
through linked `node_modules`, and build optimizer is able to properly
detect files as side-effect free.
PR Close#37623
Refactors the `ng_rollup_bundle` rule to a macro that relies on
the `@bazel/rollup` package. This means that the rule no longer
deals with custom ESM5 flavour output, but rather only builds
prodmode ES2015 output. This matches the common build output
in Angular projects, and optimizations done in CLI where
ES2015 is the default optimization input.
The motiviation for this change is:
* Not duplicating rollup Bazel rules. Instead leveraging the official
rollup rule.
* Not dealing with a third TS output flavor in Bazel.The ESM5 flavour has the
potential of slowing down local development (as it requires compilation replaying)
* Updating the rule to be aligned with current CLI optimizations.
This also _fixes_ a bug that surfaced in the old rollup bundle rule.
Code that is unused, is not removed properly. The new rule fixes this by
setting the `toplevel` flag. This instructs terser to remove unused
definitions at top-level. This matches the optimization applied in CLI
projects. Notably the CLI doesn't need this flag, as code is always
wrapped by Webpack. Hence, the unused code eliding runs by default.
PR Close#37623
The ContentChildren decorator has a metadata property named "read" which
can be used to read a different token from the queried elements. The
documentation incorrectly says "True to read..." when it should say
"Used to read...".
PR Close#37626
Close#36839.
This is a known issue of zone.js,
```
(window as any)[(Zone as any).__symbol__('setTimeout')](() => {
let log = '';
button.addEventListener('click', () => {
Zone.current.scheduleMicroTask('test', () => log += 'microtask;');
log += 'click;';
});
button.click();
expect(log).toEqual('click;microtask;');
done();
});
```
Since in this case, we use native `setTimeout` which is not a ZoneTask,
so zone.js consider the button click handler as the top Task then drain the
microTaskQueue after the click at once, which is not correct(too early).
This case was an edge case and not reported by the users, until we have the
new option ngZoneEventCoalescing, since the event coalescing will happen
in native requestAnimationFrame, so it will not be a ZoneTask, and zone.js will
consider any Task happen in the change detection stage as the top task, and if
there are any microTasks(such as Promise.then) happen in the process, it may be
drained earlier than it should be, so to prevent this situation, we need to schedule
a fake event task and run the change detection check in this fake event task,
so the Task happen in the change detection stage will not be
considered as top ZoneTask.
PR Close#36841
Currently Angular internally already handles `InjectionToken` as
predicates for queries. This commit exposes this as public API as
developers already relied on this functionality but currently use
workarounds to satisfy the type constraints (e.g. `as any`).
We intend to make this public as it's low-effort to support, and
it's a significant key part for the use of light-weight tokens as
described in the upcoming guide: https://github.com/angular/angular/pull/36144.
In concrete, applications might use injection tokens over classes
for both optional DI and queries, because otherwise such references
cause classes to be always retained. This was also an issue in View
Engine, but now with Ivy, this pattern became worse, as factories are
directly attached to retained classes (ultimately ending up in the
production bundle, while being unused).
More details in the light-weight token guide and in: https://github.com/angular/angular-cli/issues/16866.
Closes#21152. Related to #36144.
PR Close#37506
There were some examples for 'DoCheck' in the lifeCycle hooks guide. Added a link to the relevant section of the guide in the 'DoCheck()' api docs.
Fixes#35596
PR Close#36574
In v7 of Angular we removed `tsickle` from the default `ngc` pipeline.
This had the negative potential of breaking ES2015 output and SSR due
to a limitation in TypeScript.
TypeScript by default preserves type information for decorated constructor
parameters when `emitDecoratorMetadata` is enabled. For example,
consider this snippet below:
```
@Directive()
export class MyDirective {
constructor(button: MyButton) {}
}
export class MyButton {}
```
TypeScript would generate metadata for the `MyDirective` class it has
a decorator applied. This metadata would be needed in JIT mode, or
for libraries that provide `MyDirective` through NPM. The metadata would
look as followed:
```
let MyDirective = class MyDir {}
MyDirective = __decorate([
Directive(),
__metadata("design:paramtypes", [MyButton]),
], MyDirective);
let MyButton = class MyButton {}
```
Notice that TypeScript generated calls to `__decorate` and
`__metadata`. These calls are needed so that the Angular compiler
is able to determine whether `MyDirective` is actually an directive,
and what types are needed for dependency injection.
The limitation surfaces in this concrete example because `MyButton`
is declared after the `__metadata(..)` call, while `__metadata`
actually directly references `MyButton`. This is illegal though because
`MyButton` has not been declared at this point. This is due to the
so-called temporal dead zone in JavaScript. Errors like followed will
be reported at runtime when such file/code evaluates:
```
Uncaught ReferenceError: Cannot access 'MyButton' before initialization
```
As noted, this is a TypeScript limitation because ideally TypeScript
shouldn't evaluate `__metadata`/reference `MyButton` immediately.
Instead, it should defer the reference until `MyButton` is actually
declared. This limitation will not be fixed by the TypeScript team
though because it's a limitation as per current design and they will
only revisit this once the tc39 decorator proposal is finalized
(currently stage-2 at time of writing).
Given this wontfix on the TypeScript side, and our heavy reliance on
this metadata in libraries (and for JIT mode), we intend to fix this
from within the Angular compiler by downleveling decorators to static
properties that don't need to evaluate directly. For example:
```
MyDirective.ctorParameters = () => [MyButton];
```
With this snippet above, `MyButton` is not referenced directly. Only
lazily when the Angular runtime needs it. This mitigates the temporal
dead zone issue caused by a limitation in TypeScript's decorator
metadata output. See: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/27519.
In the past (as noted; before version 7), the Angular compiler by
default used tsickle that already performed this transformation. We
moved the transformation to the CLI for JIT and `ng-packager`, but now
we realize that we can move this all to a single place in the compiler
so that standalone ngc consumers can benefit too, and that we can
disable tsickle in our Bazel `ngc-wrapped` pipeline (that currently
still relies on tsickle to perform this decorator processing).
This transformation also has another positive side-effect of making
Angular application/library code more compatible with server-side
rendering. In principle, TypeScript would also preserve type information
for decorated class members (similar to how it did that for constructor
parameters) at runtime. This becomes an issue when your application
relies on native DOM globals for decorated class member types. e.g.
```
@Input() panelElement: HTMLElement;
```
Your application code would then reference `HTMLElement` directly
whenever the source file is loaded in NodeJS for SSR. `HTMLElement`
does not exist on the server though, so that will become an invalid
reference. One could work around this by providing global mocks for
these DOM symbols, but that doesn't match up with other places where
dependency injection is used for mocking DOM/browser specific symbols.
More context in this issue: #30586. The TL;DR here is that the Angular
compiler does not care about types for these class members, so it won't
ever reference `HTMLElement` at runtime.
Fixes#30106. Fixes#30586. Fixes#30141.
Resolves FW-2196. Resolves FW-2199.
PR Close#37382
In #29083 a call to `getCompilerFacade` was added to `ApplicationRef` which pulls in a bit of JIT-specific code. Since the code path that calls the function can't be hit for an AOT-compiled app, these changes add an `ngJitMode` guard which will allow for dead code elimination to drop it completely. Testing it out against a new CLI project showed a difference of ~1.2kb.
PR Close#37372
lifecycle hooks api detailed documentation contained links which were pointing to onChanges hook only which is removed, made each hook point towards its deafult page link
PR Close#36557
Previously the comments for these files referenced a path to "packages/core/src/render3/jit/compiler_facade_interface.ts" that does not exist in the current codebase.
This PR corrects the path in these comments.
PR Close#37370
This PR provides a more helpful error than the one currently present:
`el.setAttribute is not a function`. It is not valid to have directives with host bindings
on `ng-template` or `ng-container` nodes. VE would silently ignore this, while Ivy
attempts to set the attribute and throws an error because these are comment nodes
and do not have `setAttribute` functionality.
It is better to throw a helpful error than to silently ignore this because
putting a directive with host binding on an `ng-template` or `ng-container` is most often a mistake.
Developers should be made aware that the host binding will have no effect in these cases.
Note that an error is already thrown in Ivy, as mentioned above, so this
is not a breaking change and can be merged to both master and patch.
Resolves#35994
PR Close#37111
If we detect that an injectable class is inheriting from another injectable, we generate code that looks something like this:
```
const baseFactory = ɵɵgetInheritedFactory(Child);
@Injectable()
class Parent {}
@Injectable()
class Child extends Parent {
static ɵfac = (t) => baseFactory(t || Child)
}
```
This usually works fine, because the `ɵɵgetInheritedFactory` resolves to the factory of `Parent`, but the logic can break down if the `Child` class has a custom decorator. Custom decorators can return a new class that extends the original once, which means that the `ɵɵgetInheritedFactory` call will now resolve to the factory of the `Child`, causing an infinite loop.
These changes fix the issue by changing the inherited factory resolution logic so that it walks up the prototype chain class-by-class, while skipping classes that have the same factory as the class that was passed in.
Fixes#35733.
PR Close#37022
In v9, we started showing a console warning when
instantiating a token that inherited its @Injectable
decorator rather than providing its own. This warning
said that the pattern would become an error in v10.
However, we have decided to wait until at least v11
to throw in this case, so this commit updates the
warning to be less prescriptive about the exact
version when the pattern will no longer be supported.
PR Close#37383
Remove `looseIdentical` implementation and instead use the ES2015 `Object.is` in its place.
They behave exactly the same way except for `+0`/`-0`.
`looseIdentical(+0, -0)` => `true`
`Object.is(+0, -0)` => `false`
Other than the difference noted above, this is not be a breaking change because:
1. `looseIdentical` is a private API
2. ES2015 is listed as a mandatory polyfill in the [browser support
guide](https://angular.io/guide/browser-support#mandatory-polyfills)
3. Also note that `Ivy` already uses `Object.is` in `bindingUpdated`.
PR Close#37191
Previously there was a typo in a comment within the PropDecorator function relating to and justifying the use of Object.defineProperty. This PR clears up the wording that comment
PR Close#37369
Due to an outage with the proxy we rely on for publishing, we need
to temporarily directly publish to NPM using our own angular
credentials again.
PR Close#37378
As of TypeScript 3.9, the tsc emit is not compatible with Closure
Compiler due to
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/pull/32011.
There is some hope that this will be fixed by a solution like the one
proposed in
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/38374 but currently it's
unclear if / when that will
happen.
Since the Closure support has been somewhat already broken, and the
tsickle pass has been a source
of headaches for some time for Angular packages, we are removing it for
now while we rethink our
strategy to make Angular Closure compatible outside of Google.
This change has no effect on our Closure compatibility within Google
which work well because all the
code is compiled from sources and passed through tsickle.
This change only disables the tsickle pass but doesn't remove it.
A follow up PR should either remove all the traces of tscikle or
re-enable the fixed version.
BREAKING CHANGE: Angular npm packages no longer contain jsdoc comments
to support Closure Compiler's advanced optimizations
The support for Closure compiler in Angular packages has been
experimental and broken for quite some
time.
As of TS3.9 Closure is unusable with the JavaScript emit. Please follow
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/38374 for more
information and updates.
If you used Closure compiler with Angular in the past, you will likely
be better off consuming
Angular packages built from sources directly rather than consuming the
version we publish on npm
which is primarily optimized for Webpack/Rollup + Terser build pipeline.
As a temporary workaround you might consider using your current build
pipeline with Closure flag
`--compilation_level=SIMPLE`. This flag will ensure that your build
pipeline produces buildable and
runnable artifacts, at the cost of increased payload size due to
advanced optimizations being disabled.
If you were affected by this change, please help us understand your
needs by leaving a comment on https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/37234.
PR Close#37221
Update docs in the micro benchmarks to include:
* How to run with no turbo inlining
* Where to find the profiles in the DevTools
* Best way to debug benchmarks (using the profile_in_browser rather than --inspect-brk)
PR Close#37140
Tslib version is bound to the TypeScript version used to compile the library. Thus, we shouldn't list `tslib` as a `peerDependencies`. This is because, a user can install libraries which have been compiled with older versions of TypeScript and thus require multiple `tslib` versions to be installed.
Reference: TOOL-1374 and TOOL-1375
Closes: #37188
PR Close#37198
Previously all static styling information (including the ones from component/directive host bindings) would get merged into a single value before it would be written into the `@Input('class'/'style')`. The new behavior specifically excludes host values from the `@Input` bindings.
Fix#35383
PR Close#35889
Dynamic embedded views were conceptually different from inline embedded views, but we have since
removed the inline embedded views so we now only have "embedded views".
See related refactoring work to remove inline embedded views in #34715
and #37073.
PR Close#37117
If one component Parent inherit another component Base like the following:
@Component(...)
class Base {
constructor(@Inject(InjectionToken) injector: Injector) { }
}
@Component(...)
class Parent extends Base {
// no constructor
}
When creating Component Parent, the dependency injection should work on delegating ctors like above.
The code Parent code above will be compiled into something like:
class Parent extends Base {
constructor() {
super(...arguments);
}
}
The angular core isDelegateCtor function will identify the delegation ctor to the base class.
But when the code above is minified (using terser), the minified code will compress the spaces, resulting in something like:
class Parent extends Base{constructor(){super(...arguments)}}
The regex will stop working, since it wasn't aware of this case. So this fix will allow this to work in minified code cases.
PR Close#36962
The _tViewNode field (that was marked as internal) on the ViewRef is not
necessery as a reference to a relevant TView is available as a local
variable.
PR Close#36814
TypeScript 3.9 introduced a breaking change where extends `any` no longer acts as `any`, instead it acts as `unknown`.
With this change we retain the behavior we had with TS 3.8 which is;
When using the `EventEmitter` as a type you must always provide a type;
```ts
let emitter: EventEmitter<string>
```
and when initializing the `EventEmitter` class you can either provide a type or or use the fallback type which is `any`
```ts
const emitter = new EventEmitter(); // EventEmitter<any>
const emitter = new EventEmitte<string>(); // EventEmitter<string>
``
PR Close#36989
The ActiveIndexFlag is no longer needed because we no longer have "inline embedded views".
There is only one type of embedded view so we do not need complex tracking for
inline embedded views.
HAS_TRANSPLANTED_VIEWS now takes the place of the ACTIVE_INDEX slot as a
simple boolean rather than being a shifted flag inside the ACTIVE_INDEX bits.
PR Close#37073
In 420b9be1c1 all style-based sanitization code was
disabled because modern browsers no longer allow for javascript expressions within
CSS. This patch is a follow-up patch which removes all traces of style sanitization
code (both instructions and runtime logic) for the `[style]` and `[style.prop]` bindings.
PR Close#36965
The message can be improved by removing the unneeded ‘the’ (x2).
Before:
Angular is running in the development mode. Call enableProdMode() to enable the production mode.
After:
Angular is running in development mode. Call enableProdMode() to enable production mode.
Closes#36570
PR Close#36571
Prior to this change, the `template` instruction logic was located in the `instructions/container.ts` file alongside embedded view instructions. Since unused embedded view instructions are removed in a previous commit, this commit renames `container.ts` -> `template.ts`, since only template-related instructions were retained.
PR Close#34715
Enables the `ng update` migrations for v10. Status for individual
migrations:
**undecorated-classes-with-di**.
This migration dealt exlusively with inherited constructors and
cases where a derived component was undecorated. In those cases,
the migration added `@Directive()` or copied the inherited decorator
to the derived class.
We don't need to run this migration again because ngtsc throws if
constructor is inherited from an undecorated class. Also ngtsc will
throw if a NgModule references an undecorated class in the declarations.
***undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields***
This migration exclusively deals with undecorated classes that use
Angular features but are not decorated. Angular features include
the use of lifecycle hooks or class fields with Angular decorators,
such as `@Input()`.
We want to re-run this migration in v10 as we will disable the
compatibility code in ngtsc that detects such undecorated classes
as `@Directive`.
**module-with-providers**:
This migration adds an explicit generic type to `ModuleWithProviders`.
As of v10, the generic type is required, so we need to re-run the
migration again.
**renderer-to-renderer2**:
We don't need to re-run that migration again as the
renderer has been already removed in v9.
**missing-injectable**:
This migration is exclusively concerned with undecorated
providers referenced in an `NgModule`. We should re-run
that migration again as we don't have proper backsliding
prevention for this yet. We can consider adding an error
in ngtsc for v10, or v11. In either way, we should re-run
the migration.
**dynamic-queries**:
We ran this one in v9 to reduce code complexity in projects. Instead
of explicitly passing `static: false`, not passing any object literal
has the same semantics. We don't need to re-run the migration again
since there is no good way to prevent backsliding and we cannot always
run this migration for future versions (as some apps might actually
intentionally use the explicit `static: false` option).
PR Close#36921
As of v10, undecorated classes using Angular features are no longer
supported. In v10, we plan on removing the undecorated classes
compatibility code in ngtsc. This means that old patterns for
undecorated classes will result in compilation errors.
We had a migration for this in v9 already, but it looks like
the migration does not handle cases where classes uses lifecycle
hooks. This is handled in the ngtsc compatibility code, and we
should handle it similarly in migrations too.
This has not been outlined in the migration plan initially,
but an appendix has been added for v10 to the plan document.
https://hackmd.io/vuQfavzfRG6KUCtU7oK_EA?both.
Note: The migration is unable to determine whether a given undecorated
class that only defines `ngOnDestroy` is a directive or an actual
service. This means that in some cases the migration cannot do
more than adding a TODO and printing an failure.
Certainly there are more ways to determine the type of such classes,
but it would involve metadata and NgModule analysis. This is out of
scope for this migration.
PR Close#36921
In v9, we deprecated the use of ModuleWithProviders
without a generic. In v10, we will be requiring the
generic when using ModuleWithProviders. You can read
more about the reasoning behind this change in the
migration guide:
http://v9.angular.io/guide/migration-module-with-providers
PR Close#36892
This patch is the first of many commits to disable sanitization for
[stlye.prop] and [style] bindings in Angular.
Historically, style-based sanitization has only been required for old
IE browsers (IE6 and IE7). Since Angular does not support these old
browsers at all, there is no reason for the framework to support
style-based sanitization.
PR Close#35621
We can remove all of the entry point resolution configuration from the package.json
in our source code as ng_package rule adds the properties automatically and correctly
configures them.
This change simplifies our code base but doesn't have any impact on the package.json
in the distributed npm_packages.
PR Close#36944
The purpose of the `WrappedValue` is to allow same object instance to be treated as different for the purposes of change detection. It is currently used with `async` pipe and only with `Observables`. The use case which it covers is if the `Observable` produces the same instance of the value but it is desirable to still try to mark it as changed for the purposes of change detection.
We believe tha the above use case is too rare to warrant special handling in the framework. (Having special handling causes application slowdown for the users and mental load for the developers.) No replacement is planned for this deprecation.
PR Close#36819
This commit fixes 2 separate issues related to root nodes retrieval from
embedded views with `<ng-content>`:
1) we did not account for the case where there were no projectable nodes
for a given `<ng-content>`;
2) we did not account for the case where projectable nodes for a given
`<ng-content>` were represented as an array of native nodes (happens in
the case of dynamically created components with projectable nodes);
Fixes#35967
PR Close#36051
Previously we were passing a string form of the value to pluralize
to the `getLocalePluralCase()` function that is extracted from the
locale data. But some locales have functions that rely upon this
value being a number not a string.
Now we convert the value to a number before passing it to the
locale data function.
Fixes#36888
PR Close#36901
Changes the Ivy unknown element/property messages from being logged with `console.warn` to `console.error`. This should make them a bit more visible without breaking existing apps. Furthermore, a lot of folks filter out warning messages in the dev tools' console, whereas errors are usually still shown.
BREAKING CHANGE:
Warnings about unknown elements are now logged as errors. This won't break your app, but it may trip up tools that expect nothing to be logged via `console.error`.
Fixes#35699.
PR Close#36399
Only refresh transplanted views at the insertion location in Ivy.
Previously, Ivy would check transplanted views at both the insertion and
declaration points. This is achieved by adding a marker to the insertion
tree when we encounter a transplanted view that needs to be refreshed at
its declaration. We use this marker as an extra indication that we still
need to descend and refresh those transplanted views at their insertion
locations even if the insertion view and/or its parents are not dirty.
This change fixes several issues:
* Transplanted views refreshed twice if both insertion and declaration
are dirty. This could be an error if the insertion component changes
result in data not being available to the transplanted view because it
is slated to be removed.
* CheckAlways transplanted views not refreshed if shielded by
non-dirty OnPush (fixes#35400)
* Transplanted views still refreshed when insertion tree is detached
(fixes#21324)
PR Close#35968
If there's an error during the first creation pass of a `TView`, the data structure may be corrupted which will cause framework assertion failures downstream which can mask the user's error. These changes add a new flag to the `TView` that indicates whether the first creation pass was successful, and if it wasn't we try re-create the `TView`.
Fixes#31221.
PR Close#36381
Prior to this change, animations-related runtime logic assumed that the @HostBinding and @HostListener with synthetic (animations) props are used for Components only. However having @HostBinding and @HostListener with synthetic props on Directives is also supported by View Engine. This commit updates the logic to select correct renderer to execute instructions (current renderer for Directives and sub-component renderer for Components).
This PR resolves#35501.
PR Close#35568
When module overrides (via `TestBed.overrideModule`) are present, it might affect all modules that import (even transitively) an overridden one. For all affected modules we need to recalculate their scopes for a given test run and restore original scopes at the end. Prior to this change, we were recalculating module scopes only for components that are used in a test, without taking into account module hierarchy. This commit updates Ivy TestBed logic to calculate all potentially affected modules are reset cached scopes information for them (so that scopes are recalculated as needed).
Resolves#36619.
PR Close#36649
Prior to this commit unbound attributes were treated as possible inputs to structural directives. Since structural directives can only accepts inputs defined using microsyntax expression (e.g. `<div *dir="exp">`), such unbound attributes should not be considered as inputs. This commit aligns Ivy and View Engine behavior and avoids using unbound attributes as inputs to structural directives.
PR Close#36441
Based on the migration guide, provided classes which don't have
either `@Injectable`, `@Directive`, `@Component` or `@Pipe` need
to be migrated.
This is not correct as provided classes with an `@NgModule` also
have a factory function that can be read by the r3 injector. It's
unclear in which cases the `@NgModule` decorator is used for
provided classes, but this scenario has been reported.
Either we fix this in the migration, or we make sure to report
this as unsupported in the Ivy compiler.
Fixes#35700.
PR Close#36369
The flag that determines whether something should be able to inject from `viewProviders` is opt-out and the pipes weren't opted out, resulting in them being able to see the viewProviders if they're placed on a component host node.
Fixes#36146.
PR Close#36512
Prior to this commit, the unknown property check was unnecessarily invoked for AOT-compiled components (for these components, the check happens at compile time). This commit updates the code to avoid unknown property verification for AOT-compiled components by checking whether schemas information is present (as a way to detect whether this is JIT or AOT compiled component).
Resolves#35945.
PR Close#36072
Prior to this change, there was a problem while matching template attributes, which mistakenly took i18n attributes (that might be present in attrs array after template ones) into account. This commit updates the logic to avoid template attribute matching logic from entering the i18n section and as a result this also allows generating proper i18n attributes sections instead of keeping these attribute in plain form (with their values) in attribute arrays.
PR Close#36422
In certain use-cases it's useful to have an ability to use empty strings as translations. Currently Ivy fails at runtime if empty string is used as a translation, since some parts of internal data structures are not created properly. This commit updates runtime i18n logic to handle empty translations and avoid unnecessary extra processing for such cases.
Fixes#36476.
PR Close#36499
The undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields migration relies on
the type checker to resolve base classes of individual classes.
It could happen that resolved base classes have no value declaration.
e.g. if they are declared through an interface in the default types.
Currently the migration will throw in such situations because it assumes
that `ts.Symbol#valueDeclaration` is always present. This is not the
case, but we don't get good type-checking here due to a bug in the
TypeScript types. See:
https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/24706.
Fixes#36522.
PR Close#36543
1. update jasmine to 3.5
2. update @types/jasmine to 3.5
3. update @types/jasminewd2 to 2.0.8
Also fix several cases, the new jasmine 3 will help to create test cases correctly,
such as in the `jasmine 2.x` version, the following case will pass
```
expect(1 == 2);
```
But in jsamine 3, the case will need to be
```
expect(1 == 2).toBeTrue();
```
PR Close#34625
Currently destroy hooks are stored in memory as `[1, hook, 5, hook]` where
the numbers represent the index at which to find the context and `hook` is
the function to be invoked. This breaks down for `multi` providers,
because the value at the index will be an array of providers, resulting in
the hook being invoked with an array of all the multi provider values,
rather than the provider that was destroyed. In ViewEngine `ngOnDestroy`
wasn't being called for `multi` providers at all.
These changes fix the issue by changing the structure of the destroy hooks to `[1, hook, 5, [0, hook, 3, hook]]` where the indexes inside the inner array point to the provider inside of the multi provider array. Note that this is slightly different from the original design which called for the structure to be `[1, hook, 5, [hook, hook]`, because in the process of implementing it, I realized that we wouldn't get passing the correct context if only some of the `multi` providers have `ngOnDestroy` and others don't.
I've run the newly-added `view_destroy_hooks` benchmark against these changes and compared it to master. The difference seems to be insignificant (between 1% and 2% slower).
Fixes#35231.
PR Close#35840
In rare cases a project with configured `rootDirs` that has imports to
non-existent identifiers could fail in the migration.
This happens because based on the application code, the migration could
end up trying to resolve the `ts.Symbol` of such non-existent
identifiers. This isn't a problem usually, but due to a upstream bug
in the TypeScript compiler, a runtime error is thrown.
This is because TypeScript is unable to compute a relative path from the
originating source file to the imported source file which _should_
provide the non-existent identifier. An issue for this has been reported
upstream: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/37731. The
issue only surfaces since our migrations don't provide an absolute base
path that is used for resolving the root directories.
To fix this, we ensure that we never use relative paths when parsing
tsconfig files. More details can be found in the TS issue.
Fixes#36346.
PR Close#36367
In version 10, undecorated base classes that use Angular features need
to be decorated explicitly with `@Directive()`. Additionally, derived
classes of abstract directives need to be decorated.
The migration already handles this for undecorated classes that are
not explicitly decorated, but since in V9, abstract directives can be
used, we also need to handle this for explicitly decorated abstract
directives. e.g.
```
@Directive()
export class Base {...}
// needs to be decorated by migration when updating from v9 to v10
export class Wrapped extends Base {}
@Component(...)
export class Cmp extends Wrapped {}
```
PR Close#35339
We don't have an integration test for the `undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields
migration. For consistency and to cover for the latest changes, we add
it to the `ng update` integration test.
PR Close#35339
The `undecorated-classes-with-decorated-fields` migration has been
introduced with 904a2018e0, but misses
logic for decorating derived classes of undecorated classes which use
Angular features. Example scenario:
```ts
export abstract class MyBaseClass {
@Input() someInput = true;
}
export abstract class BaseClassTwo extends MyBaseClass {}
@Component(...)
export class MyButton extends BaseClassTwo {}
```
Both abstract classes would need to be migrated. Previously, the migration
only added `@Directive()` to `MyBaseClass`, but with this change, it
also decorates `BaseClassTwo`.
This is necessary because the Angular Compiler requires `BaseClassTwo` to
have a directive definition when it flattens the directive metadata for
`MyButton` in order to perform type checking. Technically, not decorating
`BaseClassTwo` does not break at runtime.
We basically want to enforce consistent use of `@Directive` to simplify the
mental model. [See the migration guide](https://angular.io/guide/migration-undecorated-classes#migrating-classes-that-use-field-decorators).
Fixes#34376.
PR Close#35339