If a decorator or partial declaration has not been AOT compiled, then
the compiler is needed at runtime to be able to JIT compile the code.
However, it may occur that the compiler is not available, if it has not
been loaded into the application. The error that was reported in this
case did not provide insight into which class requested compilation, nor
did it differentiate between decorators vs. partial declarations.
This commit expands the error logging to provide better insight into the
class that initiated JIT compilation and offers a specialized error
message for partial declarations. This should help a developer better
understand why the error occurs and what can be done to resolve it.
Closes#40609
PR Close#42693
For the compilation of a component, the compiler verifies that the
imports it needs to generate to reference the used directives and pipes
would not create an import cycle in the program. This requires visiting
the transitive import graphs of all directive/pipe usage in search of
the component file. The observation can be made that all directive/pipe
usages can leverage the exploration work in search of the component
file, thereby allowing sub-graphs of the import graph to be only visited
once instead of repeatedly per usage. Additionally, the transitive
imports of a file are no longer collected into a set to reduce memory
pressure.
PR Close#41271
Re-add reference to Trusted Types since the issue #41754 is resolved in 12.1.1.
This reverts commit 7254fbc2baa1455e3b24400597342843df3017f2.
PR Close#42796
When using `TestBed.overrideComponent`, the overridden component would
incorrectly lose access to its NgModule's declaration scope if the
NgModule had been imported into the testing NgModule as a
`ModuleWithProviders`, e.g. using a `forRoot` call.
The issue occurred as the `TestBed` compiler did not consider NgModules
that had been imported as a `ModuleWithProviders` when associating
NgModules with component overrides. This caused the overridden component
to be compiled standalone, meaning that it does not have access to
its NgModule's declarations. This commit extends the logic for
traversing the NgModule graph to also consider `ModuleWithProviders`
imports.
Fixes#42734
PR Close#42817
In #41995 the type of `TrackByFunction` was changed such that the
declaration of a `trackBy` function did not cause the item type to be
widened to the `trackBy`'s item type, which may be a supertype of the
iterated type. This has introduced situations where the template type
checker is now reporting errors for cases where a `trackBy` function is
no longer assignable to `TrackByFunction`.
This commit fixes the error by also including the item type `T` in
addition to the constrained type parameter `U`, allowing TypeScript to
infer an appropriate `T`.
Fixes#42609
PR Close#42692
Previously, if only the `compareFn` changed but the data itself did not, then
the `KeyValuePipe` did not re-sort the output.
Fixes#42819
PR Close#42821
Angular inserts text either through text nodes (`document.createTextNode`) or using `textContent`, but the drawback of doing so is that HTML entities won't be decoded. In order to work around it, the compiler has some logic that maps the entities to their unicode representation which can safely be inserted. The problem is that our current mapping is arbitrarily limited which means that some entities will be mapped while others will throw an error, even though they're valid.
These changes expand the list to cover all entities that are supported by the HTML spec.
Fixes#41186.
PR Close#42818
For API golden tests not running against a NPM package, we extract
all transitive declarations of the specified `data` targets. This is
necessary because API extractor needs to resolve other targets that have
been linked by the Bazel NodeJS rules. The linker by default only
provides access to JavaScript sources, but the API extractor is
specifically concerned with type definitions that we need to manually
extract.
PR Close#42828
The API golden test tool should not include all types
from the `node_modules/`. This results in unnecessary
type resolution when the API golden tool is run outside
of sandbox (i.e. on windows or with `bazel run` for accept).
PR Close#42828
Adds better caching for browser archives and their extraction.
This is done because the archives are currently extracted as a build
action and these are actions are invalidated frequently, causing
flakiness on the CI and slow-down in local development.
Here is an example flaky error on the CI (that surfaces often
with RBE execution):
```
ERROR:
/home/circleci/.cache/bazel/_bazel_circleci/9ce5c2144ecf75d11717c0aa41e45a8d/external/npm/@angular/dev-infra-private/bazel/browsers/chromium/BUILD.bazel:22:17:
Extracting ../org_chromium_chromium_amd64/file/chrome-linux.zip failed:
(Exit 34): extract.sh failed: error executing command
external/io_bazel_rules_webtesting/web/internal/extract.sh
external/org_chromium_chromium_amd64/file/chrome-linux.zip ...
(remaining 2 argument(s) skipped). Note: Remote connection/protocol
failed with: execution failed
```
We fix this by introducing a new rule that downloads a browser
archive and unpacks it directly into a Bazel repository. Before
this change, the archive would just be downloaded but extracted
later as part of a build action. This is unnecessary and results
in less efficient caching as build actions are invalidated more
often, especially if developers run `bazel clean` in between.
The root cause on why the extraction often fails in RBE containers
is unclear. It's unclear why the extacted archive is not cached
properly as part of a build action (most likely some hermeticity
issue within `rules_webtesting`, but it seems more Bazel-idiomatic
to unpack the archives as part of the repository anyway, and this solves
the flakiness issue.
PR Close#42814
The alert was placed in the middle of a set of steps, which
was causing some confusion. This has been moved to the
above the steps in the section and slightly reworded to
make it clearer.
Fixes#42752
PR Close#42764
In combination with the TS `noImplicitOverride` compatibility changes,
we also want to follow the best-practice of adding `override` to
members which are implemented as part of abstract classes. This
commit fixes all instances which will be flagged as part of the
custom `no-implicit-override-abstract` TSLint rule.
PR Close#42512
TypeScript introduced a new flag called `noImplicitOverride` as part
of TypeScript v4.3. This flag introduces a new keyword called `override`
that can be applied to members which override declarations from a base
class. This helps with code health as TS will report an error if e.g.
the base class changes the method name but the override would still
have the old method name. Similarly, if the base class removes the method
completely, TS would complain that the memeber with `override` no longer
overrides any method.
A similar concept applies to abstract methods, with the exception that
TypeScript's builtin `noImplicitOverride` option does not flag members
which are implemented as part of an abstract class. We want to enforce
this as a best-practice in the repository as adding `override` to such
implemented members will cause TS to complain if an abstract member is
removed, but still implemented by derived classes.
More details: https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/44457.
PR Close#42512
Minko Gechev
David Shevitz
Renovate Bot
dario-piotrowicz
JoostK
Krzysztof Kotowicz
Alan Agius
Andrew Kushnir
Meir Blumenfeld
Daniel Trevino
Mark Goho
Andrew Kushnir
Kristiyan Kostadinov
Joey Perrott
Paul Gschwendtner
Pete Bacon Darwin