python-peps/peps/pep-0280.rst

530 lines
19 KiB
ReStructuredText
Raw Normal View History

PEP: 280
Title: Optimizing access to globals
Author: Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org>
Status: Deferred
Type: Standards Track
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 10-Feb-2002
Python-Version: 2.3
Post-History:
Deferral
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
========
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
While this PEP is a nice idea, no-one has yet emerged to do the work of
hashing out the differences between this PEP, :pep:`266` and :pep:`267`.
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
Hence, it is being deferred.
Abstract
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
========
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
This PEP describes yet another approach to optimizing access to
module globals, providing an alternative to :pep:`266` (Optimizing
Global Variable/Attribute Access by Skip Montanaro) and :pep:`267`
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
(Optimized Access to Module Namespaces by Jeremy Hylton).
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
The expectation is that eventually one approach will be picked and
implemented; possibly multiple approaches will be prototyped
first.
Description
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
===========
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
(Note: Jason Orendorff writes: """I implemented this once, long
ago, for Python 1.5-ish, I believe. I got it to the point where
it was only 15% slower than ordinary Python, then abandoned it.
;) In my implementation, "cells" were real first-class objects,
and "celldict" was a copy-and-hack version of dictionary. I
forget how the rest worked.""" Reference:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-February/019876.html)
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
Let a cell be a really simple Python object, containing a pointer
to a Python object and a pointer to a cell. Both pointers may be
``NULL``. A Python implementation could be::
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
class cell(object):
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
def __init__(self):
self.objptr = NULL
self.cellptr = NULL
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
The cellptr attribute is used for chaining cells together for
searching built-ins; this will be explained later.
Let a celldict be a mapping from strings (the names of a module's
globals) to objects (the values of those globals), implemented
using a dict of cells. A Python implementation could be::
class celldict(object):
def __init__(self):
self.__dict = {} # dict of cells
def getcell(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
return c
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
def cellkeys(self):
return self.__dict.keys()
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
def __getitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
raise KeyError, key
value = c.objptr
if value is NULL:
raise KeyError, key
else:
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
return value
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
c.objptr = value
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
def __delitem__(self, key):
2002-02-11 19:01:35 -05:00
c = self.__dict.get(key)
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL:
raise KeyError, key
c.objptr = NULL
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
def keys(self):
return [k for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
def items(self):
return [k, c.objptr for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
def values(self):
preturn [c.objptr for c in self.__dict.itervalues()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
def clear(self):
for c in self.__dict.values():
c.objptr = NULL
# Etc.
It is possible that a cell exists corresponding to a given key,
but the cell's objptr is ``NULL``; let's call such a cell empty. When
the celldict is used as a mapping, it is as if empty cells don't
exist. However, once added, a cell is never deleted from a
celldict, and it is possible to get at empty cells using the
``getcell()`` method.
The celldict implementation never uses the cellptr attribute of
cells.
We change the module implementation to use a celldict for its
``__dict__``. The module's getattr, setattr and delattr operations
now map to getitem, setitem and delitem on the celldict. The type
of ``<module>.__dict__`` and ``globals()`` is probably the only backwards
incompatibility.
When a module is initialized, its ``__builtins__`` is initialized from
the ``__builtin__`` module's ``__dict__``, which is itself a celldict.
For each cell in ``__builtins__``, the new module's ``__dict__`` adds a
cell with a ``NULL`` objptr, whose cellptr points to the corresponding
cell of ``__builtins__``. Python pseudo-code (ignoring rexec)::
import __builtin__
class module(object):
def __init__(self):
self.__dict__ = d = celldict()
d['__builtins__'] = bd = __builtin__.__dict__
for k in bd.cellkeys():
c = self.__dict__.getcell(k)
c.cellptr = bd.getcell(k)
def __getattr__(self, k):
try:
return self.__dict__[k]
except KeyError:
raise IndexError, k
def __setattr__(self, k, v):
self.__dict__[k] = v
def __delattr__(self, k):
del self.__dict__[k]
The compiler generates ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL <i>`` (and ``STORE_GLOBAL_CELL
<i>`` etc.) opcodes for references to globals, where ``<i>`` is a small
index with meaning only within one code object like the const
index in ``LOAD_CONST``. The code object has a new tuple, ``co_globals``,
giving the names of the globals referenced by the code indexed by
``<i>``. No new analysis is required to be able to do this.
When a function object is created from a code object and a celldict,
the function object creates an array of cell pointers by asking the
celldict for cells corresponding to the names in the code object's
``co_globals``. If the celldict doesn't already have a cell for a
particular name, it creates and an empty one. This array of cell
pointers is stored on the function object as ``func_cells``. When a
function object is created from a regular dict instead of a
celldict, ``func_cells`` is a ``NULL`` pointer.
When the VM executes a ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL <i>`` instruction, it gets
cell number ``<i>`` from ``func_cells``. It then looks in the cell's
``PyObject`` pointer, and if not ``NULL``, that's the global value. If it
is ``NULL``, it follows the cell's cell pointer to the next cell, if it
is not ``NULL``, and looks in the ``PyObject`` pointer in that cell. If
that's also ``NULL``, or if there is no second cell, ``NameError`` is
raised. (It could follow the chain of cell pointers until a ``NULL``
cell pointer is found; but I have no use for this.) Similar for
``STORE_GLOBAL_CELL <i>``, except it doesn't follow the cell pointer
chain -- it always stores in the first cell.
There are fallbacks in the VM for the case where the function's
globals aren't a celldict, and hence ``func_cells`` is ``NULL``. In that
case, the code object's ``co_globals`` is indexed with ``<i>`` to find the
name of the corresponding global and this name is used to index the
function's globals dict.
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
Additional Ideas
================
- Never make ``func_cell`` a ``NULL`` pointer; instead, make up an array
of empty cells, so that ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL`` can index ``func_cells``
without a ``NULL`` check.
- Make ``c.cellptr`` equal to c when a cell is created, so that
``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL`` can always dereference ``c.cellptr`` without a ``NULL``
check.
With these two additional ideas added, here's Python pseudo-code
for ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL``::
def LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL(self, i):
# self is the frame
c = self.func_cells[i]
obj = c.objptr
if obj is not NULL:
return obj # Existing global
return c.cellptr.objptr # Built-in or NULL
- Be more aggressive: put the actual values of builtins into module
dicts, not just pointers to cells containing the actual values.
There are two points to this: (1) Simplify and speed access, which
is the most common operation. (2) Support faithful emulation of
extreme existing corner cases.
WRT #2, the set of builtins in the scheme above is captured at the
time a module dict is first created. Mutations to the set of builtin
names following that don't get reflected in the module dicts. Example:
consider files ``main.py`` and ``cheater.py``::
[main.py]
import cheater
def f():
cheater.cheat()
return pachinko()
print f()
[cheater.py]
def cheat():
import __builtin__
__builtin__.pachinko = lambda: 666
If ``main.py`` is run under Python 2.2 (or before), 666 is printed. But
under the proposal, ``__builtin__.pachinko`` doesn't exist at the time
main's ``__dict__`` is initialized. When the function object for
f is created, ``main.__dict__`` grows a pachinko cell mapping to two
``NULLs``. When ``cheat()`` is called, ``__builtin__.__dict__`` grows a pachinko
cell too, but ``main.__dict__`` doesn't know-- and will never know --about
that. When f's return stmt references pachinko, in will still find
the double-NULLs in ``main.__dict__``'s ``pachinko`` cell, and so raise
``NameError``.
A similar (in cause) break in compatibility can occur if a module
global foo is del'ed, but a builtin foo was created prior to that
but after the module dict was first created. Then the builtin foo
becomes visible in the module under 2.2 and before, but remains
invisible under the proposal.
Mutating builtins is extremely rare (most programs never mutate the
builtins, and it's hard to imagine a plausible use for frequent
mutation of the builtins -- I've never seen or heard of one), so it
doesn't matter how expensive mutating the builtins becomes. OTOH,
referencing globals and builtins is very common. Combining those
observations suggests a more aggressive caching of builtins in module
globals, speeding access at the expense of making mutations of the
builtins (potentially much) more expensive to keep the caches in
synch.
Much of the scheme above remains the same, and most of the rest is
just a little different. A cell changes to::
class cell(object):
def __init__(self, obj=NULL, builtin=0):
self.objptr = obj
self.builtinflag = builtin
and a celldict maps strings to this version of cells. ``builtinflag``
is true when and only when objptr contains a value obtained from
the builtins; in other words, it's true when and only when a cell
is acting as a cached value. When ``builtinflag`` is false, objptr is
the value of a module global (possibly ``NULL``). celldict changes to::
class celldict(object):
def __init__(self, builtindict=()):
self.basedict = builtindict
self.__dict = d = {}
for k, v in builtindict.items():
d[k] = cell(v, 1)
def __getitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL or c.builtinflag:
raise KeyError, key
return c.objptr
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
c.objptr = value
c.builtinflag = 0
def __delitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL or c.builtinflag:
raise KeyError, key
c.objptr = NULL
# We may have unmasked a builtin. Note that because
# we're checking the builtin dict for that *now*, this
# still works if the builtin first came into existence
# after we were constructed. Note too that del on
2019-07-03 14:20:45 -04:00
# namespace dicts is rare, so the expense of this check
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
# shouldn't matter.
if key in self.basedict:
c.objptr = self.basedict[key]
assert c.objptr is not NULL # else "in" lied
c.builtinflag = 1
else:
# There is no builtin with the same name.
assert not c.builtinflag
def keys(self):
return [k for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def items(self):
return [k, c.objptr for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def values(self):
preturn [c.objptr for c in self.__dict.itervalues()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def clear(self):
for c in self.__dict.values():
if not c.builtinflag:
c.objptr = NULL
# Etc.
The speed benefit comes from simplifying ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL``, which
I expect is executed more frequently than all other namespace
operations combined::
def LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL(self, i):
# self is the frame
c = self.func_cells[i]
return c.objptr # may be NULL (also true before)
That is, accessing builtins and accessing module globals are equally
fast. For module globals, a NULL-pointer test+branch is saved. For
builtins, an additional pointer chase is also saved.
The other part needed to make this fly is expensive, propagating
mutations of builtins into the module dicts that were initialized
from the builtins. This is much like, in 2.2, propagating changes
in new-style base classes to their descendants: the builtins need to
maintain a list of weakrefs to the modules (or module dicts)
initialized from the builtin's dict. Given a mutation to the builtin
dict (adding a new key, changing the value associated with an
existing key, or deleting a key), traverse the list of module dicts
and make corresponding mutations to them. This is straightforward;
for example, if a key is deleted from builtins, execute
``reflect_bltin_del`` in each module::
def reflect_bltin_del(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
assert c is not None # else we were already out of synch
if c.builtinflag:
# Put us back in synch.
c.objptr = NULL
c.builtinflag = 0
# Else we're shadowing the builtin, so don't care that
# the builtin went away.
Note that ``c.builtinflag`` protects from us erroneously deleting a
module global of the same name. Adding a new (key, value) builtin
pair is similar::
def reflect_bltin_new(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
# Never heard of it before: cache the builtin value.
self.__dict[key] = cell(value, 1)
elif c.objptr is NULL:
# This used to exist in the module or the builtins,
# but doesn't anymore; rehabilitate it.
assert not c.builtinflag
c.objptr = value
c.builtinflag = 1
else:
# We're shadowing it already.
assert not c.builtinflag
Changing the value of an existing builtin::
def reflect_bltin_change(self, key, newvalue):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
assert c is not None # else we were already out of synch
if c.builtinflag:
# Put us back in synch.
c.objptr = newvalue
# Else we're shadowing the builtin, so don't care that
# the builtin changed.
FAQs
====
* Q: Will it still be possible to:
a) install new builtins in the ``__builtin__`` namespace and have
them available in all already loaded modules right away ?
b) override builtins (e.g. ``open()``) with my own copies
(e.g. to increase security) in a way that makes these new
copies override the previous ones in all modules ?
A: Yes, this is the whole point of this design. In the original
approach, when ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL`` finds a ``NULL`` in the second
cell, it should go back to see if the ``__builtins__`` dict has
been modified (the pseudo code doesn't have this yet). Tim's
"more aggressive" alternative also takes care of this.
* Q: How does the new scheme get along with the restricted execution
model?
A: It is intended to support that fully.
* Q: What happens when a global is deleted?
A: The module's celldict would have a cell with a ``NULL`` objptr for
that key. This is true in both variations, but the "aggressive"
variation goes on to see whether this unmasks a builtin of the
same name, and if so copies its value (just a pointer-copy of the
ultimate ``PyObject*``) into the cell's objptr and sets the cell's
``builtinflag`` to true.
* Q: What would the C code for ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL`` look like?
A: The first version, with the first two bullets under "Additional
ideas" incorporated, could look like this::
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->objptr;
if (x == NULL) {
x = cell->cellptr->objptr;
if (x == NULL) {
... error recovery ...
break;
}
}
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
We could even write it like this (idea courtesy of Ka-Ping Yee)::
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->cellptr->objptr;
if (x != NULL) {
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
}
... error recovery ...
break;
In modern CPU architectures, this reduces the number of
branches taken for built-ins, which might be a really good
thing, while any decent memory cache should realize that
``cell->cellptr`` is the same as cell for regular globals and hence
this should be very fast in that case too.
For the aggressive variant::
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->objptr;
if (x != NULL) {
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
}
... error recovery ...
break;
* Q: What happens in the module's top-level code where there is
presumably no ``func_cells`` array?
A: We could do some code analysis and create a ``func_cells`` array,
or we could use ``LOAD_NAME`` which should use ``PyMapping_GetItem`` on
the globals dict.
2002-02-11 10:00:03 -05:00
Graphics
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
========
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
Ka-Ping Yee supplied a drawing of the state of things after
"import spam", where ``spam.py`` contains::
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
import eggs
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
i = -2
max = 3
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
def foo(n):
y = abs(i) + max
return eggs.ham(y + n)
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
The drawing is at http://web.lfw.org/repo/cells.gif; a larger
version is at http://lfw.org/repo/cells-big.gif; the source is at
http://lfw.org/repo/cells.ai.
Comparison
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
==========
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
XXX Here, a comparison of the three approaches could be added.
2002-02-10 21:22:50 -05:00
Copyright
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
=========
2002-02-10 21:22:50 -05:00
2017-08-11 14:47:47 -04:00
This document has been placed in the public domain.